Low resolution vs High resolution
•
5 Dec 2007, 14:29
•
Journals
What resolution do you use and what you think its better. Most of the gamers using r_mode 4 ? Only for the refreshrate or something else??
What do you think is the best resolution in your opnion.
In my opnion is r_mode 4 the best because you can see there normaly when using fov 90 and you got nice stable fps + Refreshment rate can be higherd up ..
Im using r_mode 4 maxfps 76 displayrefresh 85 fov 90 (Hitboxes are bigger with 90 :) )
DISCUSS!
What do you think is the best resolution in your opnion.
In my opnion is r_mode 4 the best because you can see there normaly when using fov 90 and you got nice stable fps + Refreshment rate can be higherd up ..
Im using r_mode 4 maxfps 76 displayrefresh 85 fov 90 (Hitboxes are bigger with 90 :) )
DISCUSS!
so like 1280*720 without fullscreen =)
- it feels way smoother (game and mouse movement)
- I am (was) able to reach 120HZ on any CRT even at LANs (unfortunetely those are using this new awesome TFT technology now)
- I got few more fps back then
oh wait
my monitor can reach 100HZ @ 1024 & 1152
r_mode 4 looks to ugly, r_mode 8 only 85 refreshrate :<
r_customheight 1050
r_customwidth 1680
fuck refreshrate :DD
r_displayrrefresh 120
vid_restart
and see if it blows up.....
if lcd = max75 any reso (16:10 = 60hz most proly)
if you dont use native resolution = you sreen is quite fucked up (especially in older/cheaper tft-s)
if your pc cant handle the reso, it's up to you... (fps or quality)
if it can handle it easily, then go 4 native resolution
For good systems and CRTS that can handle fast refresh rates with "higher" resolutions, I'd choose 1024*768 or even 1280*1024.
And if you have a TFT, don't bother... ;(