cdc4 signups

by overdrive • 7 Jan 2008, 00:30 • Journals
Looking at the number of ET teams that signed up it would be nice to increase the amount of teams for ET.

LAN's aren't remembered because they hosted the 100th CS source or 50th CoD4 lan. People remember LAN because distinguish themselves. CoD4 has lots of lans. Wheter 16, 20 or 24 teams would be allowed allowed ... it wouldn't make much of a difference in the end.

ET has no other lan but CDC, but it has 36 teams signing up and at least 24 teams able to attend. CDC should try to raise the amount of ET teams if possible. ET is far from dead. It still has an active community. Stars might have left for better sponsored games, but most of them will still play ET at CDC.

More ET teams @ CDC!

Support this journal by spamming you retarded comments below.
Comments
66
▼
Roach 7 Jan 2008, 00:32
[comment]
▼
shmoe 7 Jan 2008, 00:32
support!
▼
Rickk 7 Jan 2008, 00:32
Well u are right. And 12 teams is not much there are even more then 12 top teams atm.
▼
chosen 7 Jan 2008, 02:05
thats a joke
Parent
▼
infect 10 Jan 2008, 13:35
Top 3 isnt the only "top"
Parent
▼
tALi 7 Jan 2008, 00:33
support!
▼
decem 7 Jan 2008, 00:33
agree but zey wont listen to me!
▼
Kiewan 7 Jan 2008, 00:33
they said they would increase the slots, if more teams signed up
▼
Hope 7 Jan 2008, 00:34
[retarded comment to agree with overdrivel]
▼
GeddoN 7 Jan 2008, 00:38
hi blinky bill! sup?
▼
Webby 7 Jan 2008, 00:39
agreez!
▼
dunno 7 Jan 2008, 00:46
i agree, but i didn't get with what lineups some teams will go for i.e. tag).
▼
overdrive 7 Jan 2008, 01:18
depends on what k1ck will do
Parent
▼
Ruipperi 7 Jan 2008, 00:54
agree honeybunny
▼
Adacore 7 Jan 2008, 00:56
It's the 1st CoD4 LAN, which probably means something more than the 50th.

I agree anyhow, but it's unlikely.
▼
dunno 7 Jan 2008, 01:05
nice fail.
Parent
▼
overdrive 7 Jan 2008, 01:16
My fault, haven't really followed the cod4 scene lately :/
Parent
▼
rahula 7 Jan 2008, 00:59
I agree as well, but i imagine it's unlikely since the signups arrived so late :(
▼
dunno 7 Jan 2008, 01:04
it was expected to arrive so late.
Parent
▼
rahula 7 Jan 2008, 01:06
Not my fault ;p
Parent
▼
dunno 7 Jan 2008, 01:09
surely! But seriously what's the problem in expanding the tournament?
Parent
▼
rahula 7 Jan 2008, 01:10
It's pretty late isn't it, with signups closed, and payments coming in from tomorrow onwards...It's possible i GUESS but i'm not sure.
Parent
▼
Adacore 7 Jan 2008, 01:16
It's very difficult to do - impossible, even, given the current tournament format is already stretched to the limit with the number of teams already listed.

It would be possible, at a stretch, if we dropped double elimination for all games, maybe.
Parent
▼
overdrive 7 Jan 2008, 01:41
Removing double elimination isn't a good thing. Maybe it would still be possible to have 16 teams playing, removing some CoD4 slots. I understand this is an almost impossible job, but for the next CDC it would be nice if ET were allowed to grow.

I know its a bitch with teams signing up so late, but its ET. We dont have any decent sponsors like ETQW or CoD4.
Parent
▼
dunno 7 Jan 2008, 01:44
less teams means less games and removing double elimination is even less games = bad.

EDIT: Replace ETQW with additional ET slots.
Parent
▼
Felix 7 Jan 2008, 05:47
that man speaks the truth
Parent
▼
Nickk 7 Jan 2008, 07:48
100 % agreed, but almost impossible
Parent
▼
Matias 7 Jan 2008, 06:07
it is expected from a game where isnt big mgc's..
Parent
▼
vila 7 Jan 2008, 01:01
Agreed very very very much !
▼
carniee 7 Jan 2008, 01:17
agree!!!
▼
ScaTmaN 7 Jan 2008, 01:18
HELL YEAH! :D
▼
GuNnEr 7 Jan 2008, 01:19
more ET teams at CDC ffs!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
▼
dejx 7 Jan 2008, 01:21
indeed
▼
jonas 7 Jan 2008, 01:53
hf & gl @ cdc4, when exactly will it be btw?
▼
kReSti 7 Jan 2008, 01:56
i agree with all more teams for cdc it would be nice because,so far i know there wil be ofc 4 teams of them get an direct invite and only 8 slots left its really crap when 30+ teams signed up
▼
Spirea 7 Jan 2008, 01:58
me supports olo !
▼
GeddoN 7 Jan 2008, 02:01
tried to sleep but failed :l now I try to become sleepy ^_^ bah, tomorrow school..
▼
smOke 7 Jan 2008, 02:16
I am with you man! :)
▼
Iron 7 Jan 2008, 02:17
I totally agree with you, overdriving! cya there! 8]
▼
1Viper 7 Jan 2008, 02:28
It should be quality over quantity imho
▼
tactics 7 Jan 2008, 03:03
16+ teams ftw!
▼
Felix 7 Jan 2008, 03:22
supported
▼
SwipeR 7 Jan 2008, 04:22
retard comment
▼
P5Y 7 Jan 2008, 05:44
<retarded comment>
I agree, but sadly enough it's most likely way to late :<
</retarded comment>
▼
Matias 7 Jan 2008, 06:08
ET4EVER!
▼
pupupup 7 Jan 2008, 06:11
I feel ur pain man, moar slots for ET :O)
▼
swine 7 Jan 2008, 06:23
we will see 50% percent dropouts anyway
▼
toNyy 7 Jan 2008, 06:53
supported with retard comment
▼
Nickk 7 Jan 2008, 07:48
like this there will be 10 times more qualis than games at cdc
▼
S1xtuS 7 Jan 2008, 09:39
<retardedcomment>
▼
SpeaKeR 7 Jan 2008, 10:23
agreed. but i dont think that the venue has the space for anymore teams.
▼
Mamalukes 7 Jan 2008, 10:27
the location is 2 small anyways for all the clans + spectators
get a new location or just separate etqw + cod4 from et / warsow
▼
Arachon 7 Jan 2008, 10:32
wouldn't it make more sense to do cod4/wsw and et/etqw?
Parent
▼
Mamalukes 7 Jan 2008, 10:35
well it depends , personally i would prefer to see warsow.
i dont really care about etqw but yeah might be since some et players will play both tournaments
Parent
▼
jor 7 Jan 2008, 11:17
FUCK YEAAAAAAAAH
▼
h3ll 7 Jan 2008, 11:27
Heh then we might get there too lol xD
▼
Scorchiii 7 Jan 2008, 11:36
More ET Teams @ CDC4

decrease CoD4 Teams

and seperate the games: ET/Warsaw | ETQW/CoD4

CDC3 There were 24 ET Teams and 16 warsaw player sor smth like that. And that was nearly too much imo :<
▼
ScaTmaN 7 Jan 2008, 11:42
ET&ETQW


COD4&WARSOW
▼
ton1 7 Jan 2008, 11:43
24 teams for ET !!!!!!!! gogo
▼
yousmell 7 Jan 2008, 11:54
couldnt agree more!
Back to top