visualize qualifier lineup?

by P5Y • 23 Jan 2008, 17:46 • Journals
Quote by TosspoTBased on todays stability and rules we picked out 6 clans to fight for a spot at CDC in 6 weeks.

Europe Team Visualize have recently quit 6v6 and focus on 3v3 form now on so you can't exactly call that stable...

Now that's not so bad, if the team still would attend cdc, they still got their teamplay etc but now the rumour has it they'll qualify with some new line-up...

Players have already been added to the crossfire-profile etc. I think that's going a bit to far and an other team should get the chance to qualify imo.

Waiting for a confirmation or a flame from visualize to prove me wrong. So plz give me line-up for tonights match plz! Thx

PS: This is all based on rumours for now, just making this journal to check out what's the truth.

PS2: got nothing against any player form visualize, I just don't think this is right ;)
Comments
36
▼
OVER9000BPM 23 Jan 2008, 17:48
making this kinda journals makes you (you are the gD manager arent you?) look like a retard
▼
P5Y 23 Jan 2008, 17:50
Don't care what it makes me look like, if the facts are true I find it rather wrong to let them play tbh and something should be done.

If I'm wrong, which I honestly rather doubt, I will more than willingly appoligize to visualize...
Parent
▼
abort 23 Jan 2008, 19:12
using that flag makes you look like a retard.
Parent
▼
overdrive 23 Jan 2008, 19:13
He has a point. We signed up for qualifiers and had a quick look at the lineup of Vizualize. We didnt expect much of resistance and didnt prepare at all.

Vizualize started with 2 players out of their original lineup and by the end of the game even replaced one of those with another player that wasn't in their lineup.

I'm pretty sure Vizualize was picked because they werent just another 2 week clan, but it seemed like they threw away their selfrespect by replacing their own players with players of other clans, players who joined about every clan that got an invite.

Pick a horse, and stay with it.
Parent
▼
OVER9000BPM 23 Jan 2008, 19:15
dident know the facts, just flamed straight away!
this is cf!
Parent
▼
overdrive 23 Jan 2008, 19:17
Just took your comment as it didnt make any sense and this way my comment gets to be at the top of the journal :P
Parent
▼
OVER9000BPM 23 Jan 2008, 19:18
you sir, know what marketing means!
Parent
▼
Cardo 23 Jan 2008, 17:49
i know more about this hahaha
▼
JALLAAAAAA 23 Jan 2008, 17:56
uhm they signed up again so they will play
▼
P5Y 23 Jan 2008, 17:58
i know, the question is with what line-up, that's what this topic is about, i wanna know their line-up ;)
Parent
▼
JALLAAAAAA 23 Jan 2008, 18:02
they could sign up with a new line up AGAIN so.... anyway i would now give visual a autowin for this match tonight.... only because the enemy is trying to get through without playing
Parent
▼
P5Y 23 Jan 2008, 18:12
i'm not their enemy ;) and it's not allowed to change line-up, only minor change, afaik they allmost change entire line-up ;)
Parent
▼
JALLAAAAAA 23 Jan 2008, 18:17
ye but there was an announcemt ppl could signup again so new line up np
Parent
▼
P5Y 23 Jan 2008, 18:19
Quote by TosspoTLineups (We only allow a small lineup change, pm an admin if you want to do this)
NetherlandsVisualize: Roxah / TrgT / Jimini / rixzz / Smokey / Impulz / chry

--> clearly states building new LU is not an option imo
Parent
▼
JALLAAAAAA 23 Jan 2008, 18:26
show me where you can see where it's not allowed to sign up a new line up?
Parent
▼
Rickk 23 Jan 2008, 19:26
Well if we would we could swapped our whole lineup also, as long we did a re-qualifier
Parent
▼
P5Y 23 Jan 2008, 19:32
that's the point, "We only allow a small lineup change, pm an admin if you want to do this" states it's not allowed, or am i rly that stupid

I mean, I get the picture, new line-up, you qualify again anyways, so np. But they say it's not allowed, and if visualize does it, it's once again a rule that has been made only to be broken...
Parent
▼
RoxaH 23 Jan 2008, 18:01
hi psy, some people left krauts after cdc so went looking for new players and we played 3v3 on clanbase, because it was difflicult to find dedicated people, but we are praccen with this lineup now: infect, phil, trgt, jimini, rixzz, koral, me and flashy we changed the lineup because of a couple of members leafed because we didnt make it in the first qualification, so we got some changes for cdc but still got the lineup.

Greetz Roxah

sorry for my engrish
▼
Rafiki 23 Jan 2008, 18:05
So infect, phil, koral & flashy are new?? :D
Parent
▼
P5Y 23 Jan 2008, 18:13
k thx for infos, grtz
Parent
▼
UnitedSmokey 23 Jan 2008, 19:00
tell me 1 thing why do you care? you lost 4-0 lol + btw i don't understand why we need play 2 matches again and not NR lol this hole competion is a fucking joke 2 me. we played 1 of best teams in playoff and still need 2 play 2 matches again funny shit
+ all other teams made changes so care.com
Parent
▼
P5Y 23 Jan 2008, 19:03
that's my point, it's not a personal attack to visualize or it's players, it's just that every rule that has been set for the qualifiers has been changed for some team and the teams that have to play twice qualifiers etc are picked in a verry strange way...
Parent
▼
ipsOOnnn 23 Jan 2008, 18:01
think the lineup will be : infect koral impulz trgt rixxz jimini phil but maybe i'm wrong
▼
Prydz 23 Jan 2008, 18:06
Ye indeed

Impulz & smokey made a new lineup (#retro4u.de)

Maybe they can still comeback for cdc dunno
▼
infect 23 Jan 2008, 18:14
why not ?
▼
P5Y 23 Jan 2008, 18:17
well, they just rebuild line-up over and over again, previous qualificationrounds they already played with merc's afaik and now they change 4 players. Wouldn't exactly call that stable tbh...
Parent
▼
atemi 23 Jan 2008, 18:26
100% correct and agree.
Parent
▼
0V1E 23 Jan 2008, 18:41
let them play
▼
Rickk 23 Jan 2008, 19:33
QuoteWe also dropped Visualize from the qualifiers because they wanted to play with 4 new players while we can only allow minor lineup changes.
▼
P5Y 23 Jan 2008, 19:34
Now I'm the bad guy :<
Parent
▼
Rickk 23 Jan 2008, 19:35
Was thinking that to, I feel sorry for you + Viz.
Parent
Back to top