in_mouse -1 and 1

by nvc • 25 Feb 2008, 17:43 • Journals
whats the difference?? *edit"(in quake 3)

i was always using in_mouse 1 but then someone said to use -1 its better?!
Comments
18
▼
pred 25 Feb 2008, 17:44
:Z:Z:Z::Z
▼
nuNca 25 Feb 2008, 17:46
doesn't work anymore, it does work in Q3 afaik.
▼
nvc 25 Feb 2008, 17:51
meant q3 sry xD
Parent
▼
abort 25 Feb 2008, 17:49
-1 is removed from ET as its bugged, 1 is the best working possibility in ET.
▼
lettu 25 Feb 2008, 17:54
1 using direct input -1 no direct input
if u have high DPI u should use 1 to avoid negative accel
▼
diph 25 Feb 2008, 18:03
1= sometimes buggy when moving the mouse very fast
-1 solves this problem
▼
nvc 25 Feb 2008, 18:06
400dpi 3.0 intellimouse, should i use -1 then since its low dpi? or doesnt it matter?
▼
overdrive 25 Feb 2008, 18:20
When you use in_mouse -1 mouseinputs will be put into a buffer before being processed. This is used to prevent negative accel caused by the quake engine. in_mouse -1 aka direct input is slower, you will notice it really hard when railing. Its kinda the same as using vsync, also creates inputlag by buffering inputs.

us default in_mouse 1.
Parent
▼
wipeout 25 Feb 2008, 18:38
You confused the two. It's vice-versa (like lettu wrote).
Parent
▼
overdrive 25 Feb 2008, 18:42
yeah, the default value
Parent
▼
BLACKHOMMIEPOLSKA 25 Feb 2008, 18:19
try this imo http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RSsJ19sy3JI
▼
julianK<3foonr 25 Feb 2008, 18:56
Am I the only one cheering when being rickrolled, just because I like to listen to that song so much?
Parent
▼
h8m3 25 Feb 2008, 20:09
in_mouse 0
use keyboard
▼
Deactivated5924 25 Feb 2008, 21:38
listen to this man
Parent
Back to top