3.0... WMO 1.1a

thinking about switching back to my old mouse, WMO 1.1a

image: microsoft_mousewheel

been using ie 3.0 for around a year now, but recently i played a flash game with moving targets and i seemed to track better using my old WMO 1.1a ( higher % accuracy - http://assassin2150.webpark.cz/strel.html ) so im starting to wonder if i should play with this in q3 again as i use my wrist mainly to aim (18cm/360) and only move my arm for 360s and flick rails... however the WMO feels strange on flick rails.. as if there is some lag after i stopped moving the mouse, not sure.

yeh its all probably placebo.. since i aim consistantly with the 3.0 and when its not broken dont fix it... but i was wondering if you could share your experiences with either mouse.. should i be using 1000hz?! atm im using 500hz and have done since forever

<3
Comments
15
500hz is ok
Looks ugly..
1.1a = image: intellimouse_optical
thats IE 1.1a
wmo has no sidebuttons
Parent
oh right, i mixed
Parent
we has these mice @ school :D
love my wmo mainly because its so light and simple shape
no point changing to 1000hz
CreaTive 3000 imo!
check how the mouses do at diffrent hz here: http://www.esreality.com/?a=post&id=1265679
not relevant since 250, 500 and 1000 perform the same
Parent
I dont know where you read/heard that but its not true.
Parent
no point to have 500 hz, try 125 nVc
use 1000 hz, if can handle
mx518 ftw
I use wmo1.1a and for the price, its unbeatable.
Back to top