PB question??
•
24 Mar 2008, 11:35
•
Journals
Cant PB sue nC? Im not a law student but if been thinking about this for a sec and nC clearly damaged PB imo?
Any lawstudents here?
Any lawstudents here?
|
35.2 %
(19 votes)
|
|
64.8 %
(35 votes)
|
EDIT: At least in Finland it's not legal to earn even a single coin of black money.
Though there's a limit of taxfree money untill some point.
They just pasted some text ... as far as i know thats still legal, pb just shouldnt have been THAT stupid. (still cant believe they used that as anti-cheat)
edit 1:
ok i found something:
PB can apply principle "action de in rem verso": no one can enrich at the expense of others. In this case nC would have to indemnify PB and stop producing hacks since they make money by violating PB-Contract.
I will search some articles. Just wait a bit
edit2:
i found the articles corrsponding to this problem:
articles 1376, 1378, 1379 (not sure about 78 and 79) 1382-1384 of civil law say that whoever causing a damage to someone other has to indemnify the other one. Includes breach of contract.