Another quality test journal

by rebelii • 24 Mar 2008, 11:36 • Journals
Hello crossfire :D


So I made my first clip using Image.exe with some Depth of Field...

And I need your opinions.

RIGHT CLICK -> SAVE AS

http://www.revolution.ycn-gaming.com/Random/Imagetest2.mp4

First link , with contrasts (too dark imo ... Just realised that.)

http://www.revolution.ycn-gaming.com/Random/Imagetest.mp4

Second link , tried (and failed it seems) to make some coolish colors mAx Chapter 3 style ...



Anyway - The point of this is knowing if :

The encoding is okay and what to do about it if it's not
Too much DoF or Blur (or not enough)
The sound quality is good
What to do to make the colors look better...
The CFG used is good
The resolution , etc.


Please if you're gonna say it sucks at least give some arguments , so I can improve and make some better quality :F

[If you wonder, both clips are 4.2mb large , I'm not killerboy :O]
Comments
14
▼
Grumly 24 Mar 2008, 11:38
Ok I watched them both and :
The encoding is okay
Too much DoF or Blur
The sound quality is good
The CFG used is good
The resolution is good
▼
rebelii 24 Mar 2008, 11:39
Thanks for taking your time to watch them both - Do you think there was too much DoF or just too much Blur , or both ?
Parent
▼
kashu 24 Mar 2008, 11:42
there's blur on the popups.
should be a bit brighter imo.
try with a framerate of 50fps, it gives a nice effect.
otherwise it's ok.
▼
rebelii 24 Mar 2008, 11:45
As I use Image.exe and used to have Its A Wrap! , I've always recorded with a 25 framerate with a way higher value's motion blur.

Also I know there is DoF on the popups , I'm currently looking for help about it , I'll ask Madscientist or anyone else related to Image.exe :-P

Thanks for your comment :*
Parent
▼
sean 24 Mar 2008, 11:49
kikouuuuuu!!!

Come irc fag
Parent
▼
Deactivated5924 24 Mar 2008, 13:08
50fps looks shit tbh, especially with motion blur and 50fps without motionblur will be smooth, but it will be harder to render and you'll be looking at 50-60mb/min to get good quality.
also it takes away from the feel of the game, 25/30 fps + motionblur feels more like the real thing.
Parent
▼
kashu 24 Mar 2008, 14:09
"k"
i guess you did all the tests to say that.
i did and 1) 50fps doesn't look shit. it's way smoother and it's closer to reality than 25fps. btw the human eye can see up to 70fps so it's not useless. at least my eye can clearly see the difference.
2) 50fps doesn't need twice more memory to get a similar quality. 30mb/min is enough for 720p. 3) 25fps isn't closer to the feel of the game. how many people play ET @ 25fps? none. btw using 50fps doesn't mean you don't need motion blur. The result is completely different between 50fps without blur and 25fps with blur.
Parent
▼
Deactivated5924 25 Mar 2008, 00:34
the size is alot bigger than 30mb/min without mblur and the qualiy will be unstable

also, 50fps does look smoother, but it looks TOO smooth. it looks like you are floating. i've done a trickjump movie with 50fps no blur and i prefer 25fps + blur.
yes, no one plays at 25fps, no one plays at 50 fps also, but you cant compare movie 25fps with game 25fps you stupid retard.
Parent
▼
Kito 24 Mar 2008, 11:55
they suck! and i wont get a reason! hahaha im so evil :<

its too blurry i cant see a shit
the colours in both clips are ugly
its too dark (try bumpmap or some more contrasts +brightness)
i dont had anykind of sound
▼
sean 24 Mar 2008, 12:17
There was no sound :D
Parent
▼
rebelii 24 Mar 2008, 14:20
There is sound you retard lulz :(
Parent
▼
sean 24 Mar 2008, 14:30
LOL
Parent
▼
rebelii 24 Mar 2008, 15:13
"Grumly's comment : The sound quality is good"

mdr@u
Parent
Back to top