low or high graphics

by KAZZUJA • 31 Mar 2008, 17:38 • Journals
what better for your aim ect.?
geometric details on low or on high
and the same for texture details whats better low or high?
Comments
26
▼
diph 31 Mar 2008, 18:39
low for sure! (both)
there r too much annoying things @ high detail
▼
mjazgun 31 Mar 2008, 18:39
low low low
▼
morfine 31 Mar 2008, 18:39
what ever u like mr.
▼
pupupup 31 Mar 2008, 18:42
low graphics
▼
OVER9000BPM 31 Mar 2008, 18:43
i cant choose.
▼
oxidFimS 31 Mar 2008, 18:43
lowlowlowlowlowlowlow ^^
▼
Rafacz 31 Mar 2008, 18:43
picmip 1 = more hedshots :P
▼
b 31 Mar 2008, 18:51
cut the bullshit!
Parent
▼
ENSJQM 31 Mar 2008, 18:50
how could gfx accect aim?
▼
finkregh 31 Mar 2008, 18:54
i dunno exactly but i'm sure i read someting about it in "aiming by raziel" :p
Parent
▼
Spirea 31 Mar 2008, 19:03
it's just your PC runs better with low details, and therefore it gives a positive effect
Parent
▼
Deactivated2373 31 Mar 2008, 19:12
strange thing is, I shoot much better with an ugly highdetailed config then a config like sheep's his
Parent
▼
Spirea 31 Mar 2008, 19:50
prolly u see better with the high config

if u got a good PC, it doesn't matter that much if u got high cfg, because it's not much faster with low cfg anyway
Parent
▼
finkregh 31 Mar 2008, 20:29
nono i mean i read something there about you get more hs with high graphics, don't have time to look it up now but im pretty sure! :p
Parent
▼
lynch 31 Mar 2008, 19:01
it affects fps
Parent
▼
ENSJQM 31 Mar 2008, 19:23
...
Parent
▼
lynch 31 Mar 2008, 20:10
consequently making your aim worse because you have less frames per second...
Parent
▼
ENSJQM 31 Mar 2008, 20:20
OKAY MAN THANKS
Parent
▼
fragma 31 Mar 2008, 19:05
r_mode 4
fullscreen 1
picmip 3

And enjoy blurred backgrounds with visible enemy heads
▼
Deactivated5924 31 Mar 2008, 19:21
r_picmip 2
r_lodbias 2
win
Back to top