Ncie Egnlsih
•
23 May 2008, 19:37
•
Journals
Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at an Elingsh uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht frist and lsat ltteer is at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a toatl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae we do not raed ervey lteter by itslef but the wrod as a wlohe.
How's your friday evening by the way? :>
edit: Did someone say this is new? This is journal, not news.
How's your friday evening by the way? :>
edit: Did someone say this is new? This is journal, not news.
pretty chill friday here...
didnt make any mistake, but i knew it already ^_^
dont need any research to tell me that !
and try scrambling that with your method
“yxx cxn xndxrstxnd whxt x xm wrxtxng xvxn xf x rxplxcx xll thx vxwxls wxth xn “x” ( t gts lttl hrdr f y dn't vn kn whr th vwls r).” [10]
I used this example from Steven Pinker's 'The Language Instinct' in an essay I wrote a few weeks ago on 'The limits of your language are the limits of your world.' Discuss with reference to at least one text.
I used Mrs Dalloway and Septimus's mental health as an example.
You're simplifying somewhat, but it's to do with redundancy and generative grammar structures within 'language', not 'we don't read all the letters'.
i win, right?