Mockup xfire theme
•
1 Jul 2008, 09:22
•
Journals
Wrote this all this morning @ bored, uses valid strict xhtml and divs unlike xfire, liquid width, and only 3 very small images (2 are backgrounds and 1 is xfire logo). Displays correctly in all browsers including IE6 and hand-held stuff. Colours are supposed to be easy on the eyes.
http://lightcast.cc/crossfire/
http://lightcast.cc/crossfire/
Pros:
#1 The code is very well optimized - would be much faster than what xf is atm.
#2 It's fluid width, so it scales when the browser size gets bigger / smaller, what our beloved crossfire.nu doesn't do yet
#3 It's code is very compatible. Most of the browsers will run it, if not all. (Crossfire 3.0 seems to have some bugs with IE.)
#4 It uses divs&css instead of tables! This makes the site become: More search-engine friendly, faster to load, and it will have a clearer source code.
#5 All this, and it even managed to stay standards compliant(xhtml 1.1 strict!)! (although you forgot to add one "alt" attribute to an image on line 22, but that's not such a big flaw at all).
Cons:
#1 Yeah, I have to admit it's not so pretty. But it can be easily skinned by a designer. It could use a few gradient x-repeat background images for the bars.
if i browse that on fullscreen the body of the page is far too wide to be readable, harder to plan content layout when you dont have control over how it renders on the users side..
the first line of dreamweaver text for me is far too long!Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Quisque vel velit non nunc tempor dapibus. Aenean est tellus, pharetra vel, blandit sit amet, pretium vel, nisl. Duis neque. Nam vel dui gravida augue mattis adipiscing. Praesent vitae ipsum. Vestibulum faucibus porttitor erat. Maecenas ullamcorper, turpis
I'm using it for last.fm (nice brown layout now).