hz halp
•
17 Jul 2008, 13:16
•
Journals
can anyone more technically inclined with crt monitors tell me which values would be best to use
the possible ones really are;
120hz/125fps (current because im used to it from older monitor)
125hz/125fps
140hz/125fps
which one is technically the best and why
i feel like i should know this (or at least do some research and learn about it)
ty
the possible ones really are;
120hz/125fps (current because im used to it from older monitor)
125hz/125fps
140hz/125fps
which one is technically the best and why
i feel like i should know this (or at least do some research and learn about it)
ty
also, b_placebo \o/
I recon the best would be simply that what feels fine for you. Try both 140/125 and 120/125 and see which looks better in your eyes. You will not achieve an improvement in how you play or anything, it's just about what looks best to your eyes.
utopia's explanation actually made a lot of sense too, think ill stick to 120/125
I've been behind computers my entire life ever since I was 11. I'm 36 now so that's 25 years. I've been behind actual old-ass TV screens at a distance of maybe 50 cm for years in a row and guess what. My eyesight is perfect. 20/20 vision here mate.
So much for the "old TV-screens and lowHz Monitors will kill your eyes" theory.
one guy can smoke for his whole life and he wont catch anything and one guy can smoke one day and have cancer...
i have a friend who had perfect vision, and after watching tv lots of time rly rly close, he now need glasses.
so i guess in your 36 years you live, you didnt learn anything :~>
"...After three decades of extensive use of SBE [Screen-Based Equipment] in the workplace and several surveys of the ocular health of SBE users, including one six-year prospective survey, there is no credible evidence that they cause cataract or other eye disorders..."
Rays? Really?
i learned this thing, i dont even know how to say it in english
i want to talk about spectrum etc but i dont know how to explain myself :(
so go away from me :(
beside there are many many researches and many studies conduct about those stuff
what you gave doesnt prove anything
find a reaserch that support me
when i said being blind i exaggerate since he either not going to be a good player xD
but it will dmg it and dont deny it !
fail!
really amazing
ur just acting like a kid, omg
and ofc u read it, dont lie
god you are stupid :D
Well that's what this entire discussion was about wasn't it. I think it doesn't and apparently it's also the conclusion of a research done by experts on the topic. The only thing wrong here is that you blatantly believe that it damages your eyes but you have no facts to back it up, nor do you want to educate yourself by trying to find out if there is truth to what you so blatantly believe.
have fun
i have more thousends of reaserch
STFU
Just as much as I don't speak hebrew.
go find someone to transalte it for you
i will do the same with the dutch website :~>
yuuu de manne
kanker noob
jij bent een aap !
anyway i gave you a reaserch that im right
i cant translate it...
i dont even know what to write in english :o
1. It looks more like a blog / newssite than a trustable source of scientific information.
2. I don't need to be convinced that Tv's and Monitors are not bad for your eyes.
3. You are too lazy to proof your own point by directing me to an english research that has facts and or a conclusion where it says that Tv's and Monitors are in fact dangerous for your eyes.
If you really think it's bad for your eyes and you can find me some english or dutch scientific information about it, I'd be more than happy to read it.
so dont, its not a blog
you asked for proofs for research, i gave you
i dont care anymore :~>
do i sense contempt?
anyway my point is that it will hurt you
how bad? it depends in many factors...
What do you base this on? What scientific or medical article or research-report have you read that states that it will hurt your eyes?
Is it not true that jews live in israel? Or do you think jew is a bad word?
i would take a dutchi to translate :D
accourding to sol
and you know how smart is sol...
if you are so interested in this, since im not
go search for more more reaserch about it, from better sources
and give me the answer :D
*sigh*.. please read again.
with dvi (digital) cable i can only have 60 hz :<
to have 75 i need to lower reso :O
125hz/125fps tearing on the q3 enfine, r_swapinterval 1 makes lag delay - don't use it on q3 games
140hz/125fps some frames rendered are showed twice, some aren't = it doesn't feel smooth. 140hz/143fps should be better (1000/7) but impossible with shitty cb config
120Hz/125FPS wins!
So, Samsung SyncMaster 2232BW for 189€, is it worth it?
(Some minimal scratches on the surface)
twins!
can't send them to army ffs
:D:D:DD:D:D:DD:D:D:D
i use 125/125
xfire never seize to amaze