How do I watch stuff in HD?
•
18 Jul 2008, 20:56
•
Journals
So I have a HD screen, and I'm almost certain my gfx card supports HD
nvidia geforce 9600
Do I need a special cable or something? Because I don't think i'm making the most out of the monitor :P
nvidia geforce 9600
Do I need a special cable or something? Because I don't think i'm making the most out of the monitor :P
dont you learn this @ school :~<
find me some hd porn :(((((((
sent one of your friends to give me :D
the best is 1080p, but you need atlist 22" monitor to watch it fully
or am i wrong? :(
lets say you watch on mp4 a fully hd movie (lets say your reso @ mp4 is 1920X1080)
now mr.i-know-every-thing-about-nothing think !
how can you kill the one who have no life :O
I meant my computer monitor is HD? Or is that even possible? on the sticker it sais DVI & HD15 so I just thought it was :P
Do I need a HDMI cable or something? I don't think your average TV one would fit in my gfx card though.
you still need hd movie :(
the better your gfx and computer specs, you wont have troubles to watch it smooth
btw hd movies are like 12gb :~>
If you're planning on connecting an HD player to your monitor, you need to make sure that your monitor has the right encryption: you can do that just by trying. Same thing goes if you're using a internal blu-ray or HDDVD drive.
while some movies render by removing small objects or render by removing pictures that look the same...
with hd you dont remove those details, thats why the movie looks so real
but i heard its almost same as hd dvd (the quality)
HD = High Definition. It means a resolution higher than your usual DVD and they come in a bunch of flavors.
720p (1280x720)
1080i (1920x1080 interlaced)
1080p (1920x1080 progressive)
That's all HD is. Nothing more nothing less. NOW, in order to play any digital movie it is encoded with what you call a codec. (COder/DECoder) The piece of software that plays back the movie, wether this is on your PC or a piece of software running in your hardware hddvd or bluray player, uses the same codec to decode the movie again. This is where methods of rendering come in, but I can assure you that a method of rendering has fuck all to do with the resolution of a movie.
he said you are also wrong about the codecs
how can you know they dont connect :~>?
I'm quite curious to hear your friends opinion on this HD topic. VERY curious what he has to say about your "hd is a method of rendering" statement.
saying HD involves rendering is like saying colour involves painting.
what about satliats? even recently israel has lunch the most advanced spy satalite in the world. what about telescopes?
you are an ignorent fool !
It just show how ignorant you really are.
The microscope, pendulum clock, mercury thermometer and the thelescope all have one thing in comon. They are all 16th or 17th century DUTCH inventions.
few of many many...
and this is after 60 years we exist :D
im done talking to you, you ignorant fool >:(
Sol said you are bad !
I'm glad there are tons of smart people in israel that invent tons of stuff, because quite obviously they need some smart people over there to balance out the dumb idiots like you.
Now, if only they invented peace huh.
Oh and btw, from now on I will not talk to you anymore. I will just reply with "I will not talk to you anymore"
acourding to your precious wikipedia, holland wasnt the one to invent the telescope
HAHAHA you are fucking owned !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telescope
omg ;DDD
i cant breath
The name "Telescope" (from the Greek tele = 'far' and skopein = 'to look or see'; teleskopos = 'far-seeing') was invented by an unidentified Greek poet/theologian, present at a banquet held in 1611 by Prince Federico Cesi.
The history of telescopes dates back to the 11th century century when an Iraqi man named Ibn Al-Haytham described in his Book of Optics the first instrument to magnify distant objects which was written while he was under house arrest in Cairo, Egypt
His descriptions in the Book of Optics helped set the parameters in Europe for the later advances in telescopic and microscopic technology,[3][4]but the first known practically functioning telescope is credited to the German-Dutch lensmaker Hans Lippershey in 1608.
Doing research and actually inventing and creating something are two different things.
first its german-dutch
second he invented it many many years before them :DDD
anyway, my engineer friend ask me what is this forum before he comment, and i told he some gaming forum i use...
im going to follow his advince, "stop talking with that idiot"
good bye ronner, good luck and have fun
But anyway, I'm gonna go back to my earlier stance which is "I will not talk to you anymore." because you simply are too retarded to comprehend anything.
Well, I recon I'll help you and your imaginary engineer friend out so read up and hopefully next time you won't talk so much bullshit.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-definition_video
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Codec
and now i will make history...i think i was wrong...
i learn the hd thing in television, when you use BW and communications
i dont know if its apply the same rules in movies etc on computer.
and btw, giving wikipedia as a source is the most stupid thing to do... think that it could be someone like you writing there, we dont want this to happen :D
Encyclopaedia Britannica is considered to be a very trustworthy source of information. Let's see how it matches up
"Nature magazine decided to see how accurate Wikipedia’s entries in comparison to those of Encyclopaedia Britannica. They have found than, at least when it comes to science, Wikipedia's entries are almost equally reliable as Britannica's entries!
Nature took stories from Wikipedia and Britannica on 42 science-related topics and submitted them to experts for review. The experts were not told which encyclopedia the stories were from. "The exercise revealed numerous errors in both encyclopedias, but among 42 entries tested, the difference in accuracy was not great: the average science entry in Wikipedia contained around four inaccuracies; Britannica, around three."
I'm starting to wonder if your ignorance could ever get to and end.
I think that you have no idea about those stuff
Actually, he's not wrong at all.
You are being stubborn, ignorant and stupid. Usually people have at least one of these qualities in arguments, but you manage to have all three, at the same time.
HD = High Definition = higher video resolutions... seriously... how can you not figure that out?
HF
If it's the connection you are worried about, then don't worry. Computers connected with a digital cable (DVI->DVI or DVI->HDMI) will give you a better screenquality but it's not like you will see huuuge differences. And besides, even if you connected the monitor/screen with VGA you will still be able to watch the same resolutions as your monitor/screen can handle.
If for instance you took an analogue connection like scart or s-video on a bigscreen 42" plasma, then yes, you will see a major difference in quality if you'd connect something digitally to it with HDMI/DVI