How to Rage a Peon.
•
22 Jul 2008, 11:28
•
Journals
Peons are the majority here on crossfire. They are a rampaging infection coursing through the veins of our beautiful community, and the only cure, the only true remedy, is good, honest trolling.
You can not outwit a peon because he has no wits, you can't reason with him because he has no reason, and you can't ask an admin to ban him because the admins are peons too. I mean just look at sol, what the fuck is that. Seriously.
What's left is diversion and trickery, clever ploys which rage and confuse the peon into submission, a type of delerium which typically ends in a mixture of anger and fear. You must avoid directly threatening or insulting the peon; they do not and can not feel emotional pain as you or I do, claiming you fucked their mother is just reality to them, you must be more subtle. When the peon insults you or questions your sexuality, run with it, e.g.
"stfu you fucking gay"
"It'd be a lot easier to fuck your father in the ass if I were, I wouldn't have to get him to put on his pretty dress."
Here the use of inestual imagery is second to the imlication of transvestiteism in the peons family, and is thus permissible. The peon will accept the fatherly assfucking but will recoil in horror upon the implication that their father would wear a dress, that's their job after all. Once you've mastered this diversion tactic you can move on to the more involved art of trickery. This method involved stearing conversations and usually takes it's course over multiple replies; it's like playing chess, you have to think ahead and course correct if thins don't go to plan.
I rocked your dads world, no lube.
You fucked an old man up the ass? Congratulations I guess.
What? no funnehs? //A challenge!
There's nothing amusing about fucking an old man up the ass, unless he's wearing a clown suit, and even then it's borderline until he lets you honk his red nose.
Exactly what happened
Explains why I found that clown suit in your parents bedroom.
After the challene the chain of replies was planned and executed. Often peons have nothing legitimate to say and the replies open to you are almost infinite, use this fact wisely and craft devastating punchlines.
Once you join the war, there's no going back. Peons often travel in groups so don't be afraid if you begin trolling multiple reply streams over multiple threads at the same time; remember to engage, divert, trick and destroy. With your help, with the intelligence, wit, and endless spare time of the crossfire elite, we can rid our beloved website of the peon scurge and enjoy a life free of "1st", "old" and "dragons". So lift up your index finger, browse to those journals, click those reply buttons, and destroy some peons.
Peons Successfully Raged:
Waki
Nonix
Raptus
You can not outwit a peon because he has no wits, you can't reason with him because he has no reason, and you can't ask an admin to ban him because the admins are peons too. I mean just look at sol, what the fuck is that. Seriously.
What's left is diversion and trickery, clever ploys which rage and confuse the peon into submission, a type of delerium which typically ends in a mixture of anger and fear. You must avoid directly threatening or insulting the peon; they do not and can not feel emotional pain as you or I do, claiming you fucked their mother is just reality to them, you must be more subtle. When the peon insults you or questions your sexuality, run with it, e.g.
"stfu you fucking gay"
"It'd be a lot easier to fuck your father in the ass if I were, I wouldn't have to get him to put on his pretty dress."
Here the use of inestual imagery is second to the imlication of transvestiteism in the peons family, and is thus permissible. The peon will accept the fatherly assfucking but will recoil in horror upon the implication that their father would wear a dress, that's their job after all. Once you've mastered this diversion tactic you can move on to the more involved art of trickery. This method involved stearing conversations and usually takes it's course over multiple replies; it's like playing chess, you have to think ahead and course correct if thins don't go to plan.
I rocked your dads world, no lube.
You fucked an old man up the ass? Congratulations I guess.
What? no funnehs? //A challenge!
There's nothing amusing about fucking an old man up the ass, unless he's wearing a clown suit, and even then it's borderline until he lets you honk his red nose.
Exactly what happened
Explains why I found that clown suit in your parents bedroom.
After the challene the chain of replies was planned and executed. Often peons have nothing legitimate to say and the replies open to you are almost infinite, use this fact wisely and craft devastating punchlines.
Once you join the war, there's no going back. Peons often travel in groups so don't be afraid if you begin trolling multiple reply streams over multiple threads at the same time; remember to engage, divert, trick and destroy. With your help, with the intelligence, wit, and endless spare time of the crossfire elite, we can rid our beloved website of the peon scurge and enjoy a life free of "1st", "old" and "dragons". So lift up your index finger, browse to those journals, click those reply buttons, and destroy some peons.
Peons Successfully Raged:
Waki
Nonix
Raptus
:(
FUSEN IS MINE<3
What is my next quest my king? I have ravaged a group of peons into eternity, what shall I do now?
going to buy 1 again i think, now that it's getting more active again in the scene ;)
www.eurobattle.net ?
anyway w3 sux, dota pwnz!
nowai
real men play quake, just like real men play sc
WC3 is entertaining to watch on a high level, such is SC,same for CS, though q4 was more impressive than q3, the previous title was great without any doubt aswell. You comment as an usual ET player you rate every older game (RTCW>ET>ETQW) higher and better than it realy is. And the WC series is older than starcraft is but the mythos behind the game is blizzard and not the game itself, though both games are totally different regarding the skills with only macro on one side with 5-6 armys and micro for wc3 with kinda only 5-6 units.
w3 is not an rts because it has no macro
also, i never said rtcw is better than et
also, q4 sucks because it doesn't have cpma, cpm is the only fun mode of quake
chosen
and about easymode: have you played on high level so far? give it a try, wanna see your "easymode" :D
<3
Sol is the most unhappy admin ever, a balanced admin should know how to force the rules and know when to look to the other side :~>
Sol never look to the other side :~D
He's raged you say calm down it's just a post
He posts politely back at you
You flame correctly right on cue
Some sort of journal to your right
As he clicks left you click right
Between the posts of fear and rage
You start to see it's war you wage
CHORUS:
Where did I go wrong, I lost this flame
Somewhere I lost my finesse
And I would have stayed up with you for an eon
Had I known how to rage a peon.
people are still having nightmares from the last time i unleashed my vocal talent using that song
id look forward to a flame war though :)
"Here the use of inestual imagery is second to the imlication of transvestiteism in the peons family, and is thus permissible."
Why do you write sentences like this ? You just need some attention I guess. You just want to look smarter. Believe me I can use a lot of strange words but unfortunatelly I born in an other country where we speak a special language not this accepted one, so you and the 99% of the cf community wouldnt understand Oh and by the way this is disallowed without the [hun] tag, what a shame.
No offense, just wanted to tell this is so annoying.
Here the use of incest is fine because it's second to the idea that their father wears women's clothing, just isn't as pithy.
I could say "I 'wrote that because I wanted to make it look like I was saying something but wasn't actually saying it, and I wanted it to not be completely clear that I was saying it at all", or I could say "I wrote that because I wanted it to be subtlely implicated."
This not because you want to describe everything perfectly this just for make yourself a figurative person.
Do you see it ? I use capital letter and period. but why
Capitalisation is the difference between "I hadto help my Uncle jack off a horse" and "I have to help my Uncle Jack off a horse"; punctuation is the difference between "A Woman without her man is nothing" and "A Woman: without her, man is nothing."
This is the real life not some Fight Club where every fucking sentence is a quote. Try to act like a normal person else you wont be accepted. Doesnt matter what you think this is a fact. Unless you are going to be a politician or a lawyer.
Have you ever were punched in your face ?
This is the writen form, I don't speak like this.
it's not hard to notice such a thing when you're a part of the majority
on a serious note, if I were you I'd re-read our little conversation :)
superiour?
Nice spelling errors there MEIGHT.
Plus, I learned a new word, "imlication"....please explain the meaning..
something you need doing?
An experiment to measure the positional distribution of ball bearings after travelling down a rough inclined plane. To analyse the results and show that the distribution discovered conforms to the standard Gaussian distribution.
Normal or Gaussian distributions are a fundamental component of many physical disciplines; statistical mechanics in particular relies upon the normal distribution of random phenomena as one of its most fundamental premises. Indeed, without the idea of a Gaussian curve, of standard deviation or mean, it is unlikely that many of the most prominent thermodynamic theories would not exist.
It is not only physical phenomena which conform to Gaussian principles; population height, shoe size, and other natural properties, when analysed correctly, appear to produce graphs and results of strikingly Gaussian nature.
When a process is referred to as random within this text, it is meant not that the result is wholly unpredictable, so much should be obvious, but that the result is not know with definite certainty: we can only assert with reference to probability. This distinction is mentioned so as to avoid confusion whenever random processes are discussed; we know to a probability where the ball, or shoesize or height, will reside, it is not truly random, but it is undefined enough to warrant the use of the word.
It should be noted that a Gaussian curve is one described by the function:
〖αe〗^(-βx^2 )
Where α and β are constants.
An example Gaussian curve:
Figure 1. Taken from http://weblog.terrellrussell.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/800px-normal_distribution_pdf.png
Experimental
A 'V' shaped enclosure, with a slot wide enough for 1.5 ball bearing widths to pass through located at the lower tip of the 'V', is mounted at the top of a rough plane inclined at an angle of 30 degrees to the horizontal; located at the bottom were 13 equally spaced slots each of 1 ball bearing width: balls travel down the slope and into the slots.
The slots are labelled from one side of the plane to the other in numerical order, 1 - 13, and the 'V' enclosure is positioned so that a line tangential to the plane and passing through the centre of the 'V' would also pass through the centre of the slot labelled 7.
A total of 30 ball bearings were placed into the V enclosure and left to travel down the slope into the slots. It should be noted that when all 30 balls are placed into the enclosure at once, blockages result, the solution is to stagger the introduction of balls over 3 or 4 runs - No formal process for this method was developed. The process is repeated 11 times with the number of ball bearings present in each slot recorded after each 30 ball drop.
Results
Slot Number Total
1 0
2 2
3 3
4 13
5 21
6 23
7 59
8 43
9 37
10 29
11 18
12 17
13 12
Table 1
The totals in Table 1. are the sum of all ball bearings falling into associated slot number over the entire experiment.
Fig. 3
The results clearly show a bias or systematic error in the propensity of balls to fall to the numerical right of the centre trough. However, as the peak of the distribution lies at the expected point, valuable insight can still be gained.
The shape of the distribution is clearly Gaussian; an overlay of a best fit Gaussian curve exemplifies this, especially when one ignores the systematic error.
Likely causes of the error are a plane inclined through an extra axis, i.e. tilted in the direction of greater frequency troughs. Less likely are imperfections in the plane itself, e.g. a plane bisected from trough 7 to 'V', with one side flat and the other sloped towards the edge; or with one side smooth and the other rough. In a future experiment it would be necessary to inspect the plane for uniformity and to check the second axis with a spirit level.
Analysing the systematic error further, we see that the balls are more likely to fall to the right of the centre line, meaning there is some effect present which causes the balls to either move to the right or stay on the right. The error, then, could stem from the 'V' enclosure: if one of the sides of the 'V' were longer than the other, the balls would be more likely to exit with a velocity in the direction that this side points. The angles of the 'V' sides, were they not equal, could also have caused an error, although it is difficult to predict exactly what that error would be.
The Angles and alignment of the 'V' enclosure were not measured or checked before the experiment began, it would be advisable then, in any additional experiments, for these values to be analysed for uniformity.
As with all investigations into probability, the more experimental data obtained the more accurate the results will be, thus basic modification would be too greatly increase the amount of data. This involved not only increasing the number of ball bearings rolling down the slope, but also either increasing the number of troughs (and thus the size of the balls), or making the entire apparatus larger so that more troughs of the same size can be fitted.
One difficulty with making the balls smaller is the associated inertia reduction and the appetence of such bodies to have their motion altered: the plane may need to be less rough in order to stop the balls bouncing around too much.
The results show well the collusion of random walks and Gaussian curves. Indeed, that the distribution survives a systematic error perhaps shows how integral such distributions are to random phenomena even more than had there been no error at all; the implication is that, in such areas as diffusion modelling, or other Gaussian phenomena, when uniform flows are introduced (analogous to the second axis tilt), the standard Gaussian distribution model would still be present in some form, only shifted or squashed in the direction of the flow. Imagining a standard 1 dimensional random walk experiment, we add a flow which shifts the direction of each walker to the right by 1 unit in conjunction with the normal 1 unit random motion; the end results is a Gaussian curve which not only flattens with time but also shifts to the right: as the error discovered is not described well by this result, we take it as evidence that a 2nd axis tilt was not the cause of the error. Taking the same model, but applying the 1 unit step only to a random half population, may give a similar result to those obtained in the experiment: if we assume that only half of the ball bearings were to be given the biased velocity from the 'V' exit, we see why giving half the random walkers a velocity is, although simplified, analogous.
Given the mundane nature of the experiment it is intriguing to note the level of understanding gathered, not only in regards to Gaussian distributions but also in terms of experimental results as a whole: always check your equipment.
In addition to the main experiment some smaller investigations were also performed, the most interesting of which involved analysis of the predictive powers and accuracy of the standard deviation value. A small sample of five balls was dropped down the slope and the mean value calculated, this value was found to be within one half standard deviation of the expected value (7). While this was certainly not a formal investigation it was a vindication of statistical methods and equally a validation of the results obtained.
As a systematic error is present it would be difficult to reproduce results exactly, however any uniformly rough plane constructed with care should be capable of providing a Gaussian distribution.
Conclusion
Difficulties in arriving at any firm conclusions arise directly as a result of the systematic error. The resultant distribution is ostensibly Gaussian, but with modifications which imply a non-random effect. Further analysis and experiment are required to determine the exact nature of this effect.
Two more to go.
Something I need to do.
He's quite sensitive about that, you cunt!
most guys honour the +1 gap anyway whenever possible, the unwritten rule of when in a public toilet to go to the space furthest away. its just god damn general curtosy. No one wants splashed on.
Personal highlight from said conversation
have the people changed
does it make you happy?
you're so strange
You must avoid directly threatening or insulting the peon; they do not and can not feel emotional pain as you or I do - check
After the challene the chain of replies was planned and executed. - check
This method involved stearing conversations and usually takes it's course over multiple replies; it's like playing chess, you have to think ahead and course correct if thins don't go to plan. - check
what do I win?
ps. HER BE DARGONZ>?!?!