xhtml valid

by abort • 10 Sep 2008, 11:21 • Journals
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=www.crossfire.nu&charset=(detect+automatically)&doctype=Inline&group=0

this webby is full of errors :X

guess you got some work to do fusen or tala... or who ever codes this site =P?
Comments
11
▼
hex4 10 Sep 2008, 12:24
lol some of them are weird :s

wtf @ no target="_blank" and even border="0".... they are basic stuff :|
▼
Sainted 10 Sep 2008, 12:29
Afaik the W3C doesn't like target="_blank" because normal users don't like every site to open a new window, and borders should be defined by style="border: 1px;" or in the stylesheet to be w3c valid
Parent
▼
hex4 10 Sep 2008, 12:37
i think that if u do that you still will have the border in that case since border=0 is used for images between an <a href>, not sure though :/
Parent
▼
FaTTony 10 Sep 2008, 12:26
impressive...but not that strange imo
try ebay or amazon ;)
▼
Atarax 10 Sep 2008, 12:31
I don't see any image: xhtml9iy-valid signs so maybe they don't want/need it?
▼
fusen 10 Sep 2008, 13:08
this is news?

we've all known the site is no where near valid for ages, I for one will not be redesigning it either :P
▼
Dreamweaver 10 Sep 2008, 13:10
they dont need the site to be 100% correct with W3C standards :-)
these are basic things which do not interrupt a normal user in using the website. Like:
- target="_blank" should be replaced with js function
- alternative text should be added to every <img> tag
- some things should be defined in css instead of html
- & -> & a m p ;
and few others
▼
Deactivated6284 10 Sep 2008, 13:39
yo abort my love
▼
artyoM 10 Sep 2008, 14:35
hitler :D
Back to top