9/11 conspiracy theory.

hey its 9/11 and i expect this journal to last maybe 2 minutes cause some admin who didnt even know 1 person inside those 2 buildings will delete it and say its disrespectful although u didnt know anyone in there.

first off my business studies teacher was on that flight. and my other business studies teacher just missed the flight. dont realy know what to say but this isnt what my point is.

the 9/11 conspiracy theorys have shown conclusive evidence the plane didnt bring the building down a controlled demolition did. and its been proven.

fact: 1) its physically impossible the planes brought the building down because the heat from the plane exploding is not enough to melt the special steel the building was made out of.

fact: 2) an unschedualed maintenance team came into both towers and wouldnt reveal what they were doing.

fact 3) odigo workers recieved messages saying the attack was going to happen a few hours before it did.

very strong evidence 4) the plane going for the pentagon aparently crashed into the ground by people fighting back on the plane. however at the crash site there was no plane, there was no parets of the plane either. seconds before the plane actualy 'crashed' an anonymous phone call was made from a guy locked in the bathroom of the plane who said 'we are being hijacked' and then an explosion happend and the line cut off. in the past when planes have crashed parts are easily identifiable however here they were not. which is lead to believe that the plane was shot down. thers many point but watch the 9/11 conspiracy theory video and everything in that video is evidence and its not made up. many many people have looked into it and all came out with the same stuff.


point is from all of the theories gatherd showing wierd things happening. many many wierd things all happenings before and on the day of 9/11 attacks which are out of the ordinary and what the media told everyone and what they showed , they showed none of these conspiracy theories it was just instantly said irealis did it. basicly the goverment invented cover stories for everything that happend that day and so many of them have been proven wrong. so the government obviously have hidden many things so what else are they hideing?

for obvious reasons the plane that was going for the pentagon was shot down however the 2 planes were found 30 miles out of the twin towers flying outside of their normal flight pattern and the plane wasnt responding. fighter planes could have intercepted that plane before it hit the twin towers yet they did nothing
Comments
184
i did it
BBC made a documentry about all these conspiracy theories and proofed them wrong. Will search up the name so you can see it yourself.
The BBC were in on it!!
Parent
lol duh of course they would deny it
Parent
simpsons did it
Just download "Loose Change 2nd Edition"
watch Loose Change!
Ye really good,but such a boring voice,same voice as girl from C&C on the PS1 :D
Parent
its good but also slightly overbiased
Parent
like all the conspiracy theorists films / documentaries tend to be
Parent
conspiracy theories come with every disaster or attack
Too long to read,but I think if America was not at fault for 9/11, they certainly used it to there advantage to gain the support of the people to invade Iraq
more bullshit pls!
point is from all these wierd theories flying around is just that the goverment coverd it all up instantly in the media without saying anything except isrelies did it.
did you mean israelis? then admin can delete this journal, you are talking nonsense and dont know what happend
np
Parent
the 9/11 proven that rules are made with blood.
its like every plane accident, the investigators improve airplanes mechanics.

after the 9/11, tall buildings are built more safe.
the twin towers had a big fuck in the metal stracture which weaken the whole building when there was fire.
Parent
you are on it 2 you sad fuck
Parent
Watched one about it being a big insurance scam, Actually made a lot of sense(The guy who owned them got insurance a year before it happened or summit, cant rele remember ;c)
btw check the last paragraph of it. :)
Achmed the dead terrorist who wasn't actually dead at the time did it.
he was in his baggage with WALTER!
Parent
9/11 is a conspiracy! LHC will destroy the world! believe more shit please.
even the legalized weed in ze Netherlands is a conspiracy.
same as that armstrong never been on the moon.

there are "proofs" too.
LoL i have just watched a reportage on a german news-broadcaster about 9/11 conspiracy theories and which has proofen those theories you have mentioned above (and some more) wrong :D
this is so much bullshit :-)
Quotethe 9/11 conspiracy theorys have shown conclusive evidence the plane didnt bring the building down a controlled demolition did. and its been proven.

true, but wat do u want from us? Attack USA goverment?
o btw the flight plan and the list of names of people on that plane show that there were no arabs on that plane. and photographic, video and credit card information all shows that the arabs who the FBI said were the hackers of the plane are infact still alive today.
Where did you get this from? Sources, or your talking shit.
Parent
yeah im sorry, its just impossible in this world to change your name and get false documentation
Parent
btw isnt the easiet thing to do is to jsut ask the people at the flight desk checking everyone in and say did u check 8 or 9 arabs in ? if they say no then there were not arabs on the plane. if they say yes then arabs are on the plane :s .

o, they said no
the easiest thing is not to start your journal with an insult to the admins who run this site. You dont have to be a prick you know?
Parent
to late? so i guess ul have to cry and delete it now right? lighten up its not aimed directly at u (more at sol) np.
Parent
So I was right, you are a prick
Parent
FFS I need to make a documentary full of bullshit so a bunch of morons can believe a bunch of made up trash.

your intelligence is showing.....or lack their of
wait , wait a sec some of the cleverest people in america are conspiracy theorists :s
Parent
Yes, clever at stringing together a bunch coincidences & twisting things to make them appear in way they are not. Thats what conspiracy theorists do

Really its all garbage & anybody that believes the American Government would intentionally kill thousands of it's own people seriously needs to have their head examined.
Parent
Didn't realize just because somethings on Wiki it makes it true :rolleyes:
Parent
did u even read it?
they admitted it them selves in their documents
its 100% true, or do u think its some kind of conspiracy??
Parent
you dont seem to understand the point of it. by me arguing it doesnt mean i believe what the conspiracy theorists are saying. im just pointing out what they are and its wierd :).

like a detective looking into a murder. does he instantly say ah well 17 year old kid did a drive by on a motorbike in the road then took a left turn and went back to his house within 5 seconds. no.. they look into it they draw from many angles and ask people however insane if they know anything and interigate people, maybe the wrong people but finding out the truth always hurts more.
Parent
If thats the case than I'll assume you've watched all the programs that disprove all these theories?

It appears to me that you haven't as your post seems to be awfully lopsided in favor of these non sense conspiracy's. A detective keeps an open mind to all possibilities & judging from most of your comments here, your mind is very closed on this matter.
Parent
someones lying u just believe what the official source is telling u without doing any thinking ur self
Parent
nope I believe crackpot conspiracy theorist because I can't think for myself
Parent
theres stupid people that believe in conspiracies and theres stupid people that believe anything they hear on tv
lets think of history hitler got in power and no one could ever imagine what kind of sick person he was
he burnt that reichstag building and blamed the communist for it and that worked perfectly
just to point out how easily government & media can spit lies if they want to at least now we have the internet which is only a good thing if u can question the things u read
Parent
But you seem to be drawing the conclusion & implying that because I choose not believe that my Government intentionally orchestrated the attacks on Sept 11 that I am a mindless drone who believes everything my Government tells me. Please explain to me how you've drawn that conclusion from anything I've said.Or are you simply assuming?

Why can't I be an objective minded person who has seen all the documentaries from both sides of the debate & made up his own mind as free thinking human being?
Parent
well not exactly i notice coming across like that but ofc theres no way knowing how u think
so sorry for that
but i remember reading some absolutely ridiculous "debunkings" where they skip all the impossible to answer questions and give many non fact based answers and then "everything is proved wrong"
Parent
I'm not gonna say it was the US government that did it, as much as I'm not gonna say that a bunch of arabs with boxcutters did it. I think we'll never know what really happened and there is a bunch of bullshit from both sides of the fence. That being said it's also clear that not everything that is given to us by US officials is totally valid. Simple comon sense denies a few things.

It's clear you believe the explanation given by US officials, so my question is this. If you have seen all the documentary's on this and seen both sides and made up your own mind on this, then I'd like to hear your opinion on the fact that the WTC debris was quickly destroyed and other recyclable parts were either exported or auctioned, however the criminal code requires that crime scene evidence is to be kept for forensic analysis. What's your view on this?

Furtermore, I don't know if you have actually seen tons of planecrashes but none of them look like the one at the pentagon.

THIS:
image: Pentagon_video_security4
is, I'm sorry to say, not a boing 757-223 crashing into a building.

THIS:
image: pentagon_lawn
is, I'm sorry to say, not the crashsite that resembles a boing 757-233 crashing into a building.

Same goes for the planecrash of Flight 93 in Somerset County. The wingspam of a 757 is 124 ft. The crashsite in Somerset Count has a span of about 30 to 40 ft.

THIS:
image: crashsite9mk
is what US officials say is the crashsite of Flight 93. A boing 757 with a wingspan of 124ft.

THIS:
image: 041129ebersol-crash
is a crashsite of an 18-seat charter jet that crashed near Montrose Regional Airport in Colorado.

I'm not saying the US government did it, but what they are handing out as official statements are simply quite hard to take for granted.

So what is your view on these things?
Parent
Quote: If you have seen all the documentary's on this and seen both sides and made up your own mind on this, then I'd like to hear your opinion on the fact that the WTC debris was quickly destroyed and other recyclable parts were either exported or auctioned, however the criminal code requires that crime scene evidence is to be kept for forensic analysis. What's your view on this?

Not sure what your definition of quickly is but cleanup took 9 months Don't you think a pile of rubble containing the bodies of 2,801 people in the middle of the countries financial district might be in the governments list of top prior ties to clean up & dispose of as quickly as possible?

Quote: I'm sorry to say, not the crashsite that resembles a boing 757-233 crashing into a building.

According to who? You're own personal assessment? Have you ever been to the Pentagon. Do you have any idea the shear size of that building?

Quote: Same goes for the planecrash of Flight 93 in Somerset County. The wingspam of a 757 is 124 ft. The crashsite in Somerset Count has a span of about 30 to 40 ft.

I see photo you posted with no reference point whatsoever to ascertain any kind of size. I suppose all the victims of that flight whose family & friends received phone calls from them are part of a conspiracy as well & I suppose the recordings of those phone calls, parts of which have been made public where can you can clearly hear the passengers trying to get into the cockpit & take the plane back is bogus also.

Maybe the correct question to ask me is weather I believe Flight 93 actually crashed.

What you've done with your post is exactly what conspiracy theorists do. They string together a bunch of variables that can both be easily explained or easily misconstrued into something they're not.
Parent
QuoteNot sure what your definition of quickly is but cleanup took 9 months Don't you think a pile of rubble containing the bodies of 2,801 people in the middle of the countries financial district might be in the governments list of top prior ties to clean up & dispose of as quickly as possible?


Clean up, yes, dispose of, no. That's against the criminal code, which requires that crime scene evidence is to be kept for forensic analysis. That didn't happen.

QuoteAccording to who? You're own personal assessment? Have you ever been to the Pentagon. Do you have any idea the shear size of that building?


Yes I have been to the pentagon actually and I know it's size. Have you ever been to Amsterdam and seen the Appartmentbuildings in the Bijlmer where the El-Al plane crashed? Sure a 747 is bigger than a 757, but I can assure you that the crashsite at the pentagon does not resemble that of a 757.

QuoteI see photo you posted with no reference point whatsoever to ascertain any kind of size. I suppose all the victims of that flight whose family & friends received phone calls from them are part of a conspiracy as well & I suppose the recordings of those phone calls, parts of which have been made public where can you can clearly hear the passengers trying to get into the cockpit & take the plane back is bogus also.


Yes on that photo there is no referencepoint, I should've picked a better picture where there is a reference point, but you missed the point of the picture. A boeing 757 crashsite doesn't look like a nice little gap with a bit of smoke coming out of it.

Those phonecalls you are refering to were allegedly made with cellphones. I don't know what kind of super ultra mobile-phone network you have in the states and especially out in the boonies, but making a call with a cellphone from a plane that is quite high up in the air, is simply impossible.

QuoteWhat you've done with your post is exactly what conspiracy theorists do. They string together a bunch of variables that can both be easily explained or easily misconstrued into something they're not.


Since you say they are easily explained, please explain them to me. You already made up your mind on this and thus should have a conclusion to these situations. If you read my post again that's exactly what I did, and that is to ask you how you explain these things we just mentioned here. I would love for you to explain why those simply do not look like boeing 757 crashsites. I would love for you to explain why the crashsite of flight 93 has a span of about 30 to 40 feet. I would love for you to explain why the only images of the 757 crashing into the pentagon are 4 separate images taken from a badquality camera. We are talking about the pentagon. The military HQ of the US. Are you seriously believing that there is nothing else that captured it? That was the only camera pointed at the pentagon? Please tell me you are not that naive.

And again, I'm not saying the US government is behind it nor do I believe a bunch of arabs with boxcutters did it nor do I believe the hilarious stuff some of the conspiracy theorists come up with. But it sure as hell stinks and we'll most likely never know the real answers. But I do know that certain information passed to us by US officials are simply impossible or "explained" with utter bullshit.
Parent
QuoteClean up, yes, dispose of, no. That's against the criminal code, which requires that crime scene evidence is to be kept for forensic analysis. That didn't happen.


Wasn't investigated according to whom? The government is not gonna tell you everything nor will any government nor will they ever. Who says they weren't analyzed? Some crackpot theorist with a camera & microphone making some shoty film he stands to make money off of as long as he can spin the web of doubt & decit big enough?

QuoteYes I have been to the pentagon actually and I know it's size. Have you ever been to Amsterdam and seen the Appartmentbuildings in the Bijlmer where the El-Al plane crashed? Sure a 747 is bigger than a 757, but I can assure you that the crashsite at the pentagon does not resemble that of a 757.


Every crime contains motive & I really cannot for the live of me understand what possible motive the United States Government would have in blowing up or destroying in anyway, any part of their Military Headquarters especially given the fact that it was so over shadowed by the towers destruction.

QuoteYes on that photo there is no referencepoint, I should've picked a better picture where there is a reference point, but you missed the point of the picture. A boeing 757 crashsite doesn't look like a nice little gap with a bit of smoke coming out of it.


Is it indicative of a plane that was shot down?

QuoteThose phonecalls you are refering to were allegedly made with cellphones. I don't know what kind of super ultra mobile-phone network you have in the states and especially out in the boonies, but making a call with a cellphone from a plane that is quite high up in the air, is simply impossible.


Two things, 1) the plane was flying at very low altitude 2) the claims are not just cell phones being used but actual phones on the plane itself.

QuoteSince you say they are easily explained, please explain them to me. You already made up your mind on this and thus should have a conclusion to these situations.


All your doing is fishing for a response that will solidify whatever it is you believe which you have yet to clearly state. You will not get it from me. Nowhere in any of my posts do I claim that the United States Government has not with held information. No where I have claimed that I believe they have told the world the entire truth of whatever findings they may have. No where have I claimed they've been forth coming & not with held any & all information. No where have I stated I believe everything I've seen or heard about the events of September 11th. The only thing I have made perfectly clear is that do not believe all these crackpot theories concerning The United States Government involvement & subcontinental "cover up" of that involvement in an act of terrorism that killed 1000's of people from all world & had an negative impact on Millions. Nor do I believe this was some form of tactic to persuade support for an eventual invasion of Iraq to gain control of Middle Eastern Oil because quite simply we don't need to kill 1000's of innocent people just to invade a country run by a ruthless dictator & criminal. Even though I do believe we currently have Oil tycoons in office that may have used 9/11 has an excuse & an opportunity it has subsequently backfired.

QuoteI would love for you to explain why those simply do not look like boeing 757 crashsites. I would love for you to explain why the crashsite of flight 93 has a span of about 30 to 40 feet.


Unfortunately I am not skilled in the field of crash site analysis & I dare to bet that neither is anybody here. I simply cannot comment on something I know nothing about but once again maybe show me a picture of what a Boeing 757 looks like after being blown out of the sky?

QuoteI would love for you to explain why the only images of the 757 crashing into the pentagon are 4 separate images taken from a badquality camera. We are talking about the pentagon. The military HQ of the US. Are you seriously believing that there is nothing else that captured it? That was the only camera pointed at the pentagon? Please tell me you are not that naive.


Please tell me you are not so naive to believe that the largest government in the world is gonna publicly release images revealing the locations of every single camera in or around their Military's Headquarters.

QuoteAnd again, I'm not saying the US government is behind it nor do I believe a bunch of arabs with boxcutters did it nor do I believe the hilarious stuff some of the conspiracy theorists come up with. But it sure as hell stinks and we'll most likely never know the real answers. But I do know that certain information passed to us by US officials are simply impossible or "explained" with utter bullshit.


Please enlighten me to what it is exactly that you do believe?
Parent
QuoteWasn't investigated according to whom? The government is not gonna tell you everything nor will any government nor will they ever. Who says they weren't analyzed? Some crackpot theorist with a camera & microphone making some shoty film he stands to make money off of as long as he can spin the web of doubt & decit big enough?


If you are so sure that it is properly investigated then how come the team that FEMA assembled to investigate the structural failures was denied access to the debris? To quote part of a new york times article "The full investigative team set up by FEMA was not allowed to enter ground zero to collect other potentially critical evidence in the weeks after the attack, and it did not get a copy of the World Trade Center blueprints until early January". For the full thing -> http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9806E0DB1230F934A35750C0A9649C8B63

QuoteEvery crime contains motive & I really cannot for the live of me understand what possible motive the United States Government would have in blowing up or destroying in anyway, any part of their Military Headquarters especially given the fact that it was so over shadowed by the towers destruction.


"The larger the lie, the easier it is for people to believe it": Joseph Goebbels

QuoteIs it indicative of a plane that was shot down?


Did I mention that it was shot down? No.

QuoteAll your doing is fishing for a response that will solidify whatever it is you believe which you have yet to clearly state. You will not get it from me. Nowhere in any of my posts do I claim that the United States Government has not with held information. No where I have claimed that I believe they have told the world the entire truth of whatever findings they may have. No where have I claimed they've been forth coming & not with held any & all information. No where have I stated I believe everything I've seen or heard about the events of September 11th. The only thing I have made perfectly clear is that do not believe all these crackpot theories concerning The United States Government involvement & subcontinental "cover up" of that involvement in an act of terrorism that killed 1000's of people from all world & had an negative impact on Millions. Nor do I believe this was some form of tactic to persuade support for an eventual invasion of Iraq to gain control of Middle Eastern Oil because quite simply we don't need to kill 1000's of innocent people just to invade a country run by a ruthless dictator & criminal. Even though I do believe we currently have Oil tycoons in office that may have used 9/11 has an excuse & an opportunity it has subsequently backfired.


I'm not fishing to solidify anything. I'm just questioning things that with simple common sense can not be true or stink to high heaven. You just said yourself that the US government is indeed not telling the entire truth and is withholding information. Why.

QuoteUnfortunately I am not skilled in the field of crash site analysis & I dare to bet that neither is anybody here. I simply cannot comment on something I know nothing about but once again maybe show me a picture of what a Boeing 757 looks like after being blown out of the sky?


I suggest you should look at airplane accident sites such as http://www.planecrashinfo.com/ or http://www.airdisaster.com/ and check out the photos there. It gives you a good enough view on what crashsites look like.

QuotePlease tell me you are not so naive to believe that the largest government in the world is gonna publicly release images revealing the locations of every single camera in or around their Military's Headquarters.


There is no need to reveal the locations of every single camera. All there is a need for is some quality footage that shows the approach and eventual crash of a boeing 757 aircraft. The problem is that such footage simple can not be provided and the most likely reason why is that it simply doesn't exist.

QuotePlease enlighten me to what it is exactly that you do believe?


It doesn't matter much what you or I believe. Neither of us will sort this out and this will only result in an endless discussion where both throw arguments around, so I will leave it at this. You believe one thing, I believe another. Neither of us is (or even can) be proven wrong. Aint that a sad thing.
Parent
QuoteIf you are so sure that it is properly investigated then how come the team that FEMA assembled to investigate the structural failures was denied access to the debris? To quote part of a new york times article "The full investigative team set up by FEMA was not allowed to enter ground zero to collect other potentially critical evidence in the weeks after the attack, and it did not get a copy of the World Trade Center blueprints until early January". For the full thing -> (url) [query.nytimes.com]


FEMA has since shown their inability to manage or respond to anything of any significance. I personally don't believe they could investigate their way out of a stolen candy bar from the local 7-11. I think it's pretty safe to assume that government has other agencies who take precedent over FEMA in matters such as these as far as investigating goes.

Quote"The larger the lie, the easier it is for people to believe it": Joseph Goebbels


Random quotes from from random historical figures is a silly tactic. Quite honestly I can do the same thing & really has no bearing on the argument..


“There is nothing as deceptive as an obvious fact” Arthur Conan Doyle, Sr
“No question is so difficult to answer as that to which the answer is obvious.” George Bernard Shaw



Nevertheless their is no possible reason anyone could come up with to convince that they would intentionally destroy part their own Military HQ taking the lives of 184 men, women and children. Men & Women who worked for the government. I mean it is so completely far fetched. If it was the US Governments intentions to spread fear & pandemonium that could have just as easily been achieved without destroying part of their Military HQ & killing members & family members of their very own staff.

The video I am posting below is presented in the same manner as these crackpot theories. A list of variables compiled in a manner to lead the viewer to a conclusion. I find it hard to understand why a video like this is any less convincing than any other theory
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YVDdjLQkUV8&feature=related


QuoteDid I mention that it was shot down? No.


No I implied it several times but you seemed to have missed that.

QuoteI'm not fishing to solidify anything. I'm just questioning things that with simple common sense can not be true or stink to high heaven. You just said yourself that the US government is indeed not telling the entire truth and is withholding information. Why.


A Government that lies to it's own people & with holds information from them? Oh my we're all doomed.Honestly since when does any Government of any Nation tell the whole truth? The US Government is not any different. As the grandson of a WWII/Korean War Vet & the son of a Vietnam Vet who severed his country dutifully for over 20 years, I can tell you after watching the crap my grandfather went through in his final years with the government they are completely full of shit, lies & deceit. I can give you first hand accounts of how much the government lies after having to deal with them personally in my Fathers final years & still am to this day almost a year after his death, they still keep lying. The US Government lying is really nothing new.

QuoteI suggest you should look at airplane accident sites such as (url) [www.planecrashinfo.com] or (url) [www.airdisaster.com] and check out the photos there. It gives you a good enough view on what crashsites look like.


Still not seeing seeing any photos indicative of being a 757 that was shot down by an A10 Warthog. Find one of those & I bet you find a match for the United 93 crash site.


QuoteThere is no need to reveal the locations of every single camera. All there is a need for is some quality footage that shows the approach and eventual crash of a boeing 757 aircraft. The problem is that such footage simple can not be provided and the most likely reason why is that it simply doesn't exist.


Why is there no footage of the first plane (Flight 11) when it hit WTC1? The obvious answer would be because nobody was looking at WTC1 with a camera as they had no reason to. Why are there so many clear shots from so many angles of the second plane (Flight 175) impacting WTC2, because 100's of cameras were pointed at the towers recording the aftermath of WTC1. People see the footage & the images of the 2nd plane & automatically assume that the images of the Pentagon crash should be of equal quality & equal number of vantage points. This is an extremely ignorant assumption. The simple fact of the matter is the cameras that captured what's said to be a passenger airliner crashing into the building at a very high rate of speed are nothing more than security cameras incapable of capturing the kind of high quality images captured by high dollar news cameras of Flight 175 hitting WTC2.

QuoteIt doesn't matter much what you or I believe. Neither of us will sort this out and this will only result in an endless discussion where both throw arguments around, so I will leave it at this. You believe one thing, I believe another. Neither of us is (or even can) be proven wrong. Aint that a sad thing.


As I've stated before I'm not some mindless drone who sits around listening to good government bullshit completely incapable of free thought. I've stated several times that yes I believe there are discrepancy's in the official US statements. I've made it clear that yes I believe our government lies & believe as most Americans do that the government has withheld information but that doesn't make them criminals who masterminded the biggest & most atrocious attack on American soil in history. That's simply an outlandish claim with no possible motive whatsoever. I can promise you the US government has withheld information & lied about events surrounding Hurricane Katrina, does that mean they flew the hurricane into New Orleans? Wait I should probably stop there as I'm sure there's some lunatic with a camera somewhere right now making a movie that makes that claim.

Anybody who thinks that the most powerful country in the world needs to kill 1000's of it's own people, completely destroy its entire financial infrastructure, destroy part of it's own Military HQ killing 100's pf it's own personnel costing itself almost $2 Trillion is seriously grasping at straws & I'll say it again, needs to have their head examined.

BTW just so you know I am by no means taking an angry stance against your point of view. Nothing wrong with healthy debate.
Parent
QuoteThat's simply an outlandish claim with no possible motive whatsoever.


Of course there is a motive and a very easy one at that but it's one that's too gruesome to believe.

On a side note, I sincerely hope you are right and that it were in fact a bunch of smart arab's with boxcutters that pulled this one of.
Parent
i remember a case when a boing plane crash into the water
all remains were not bigger than 1cm

what are you going to achive with keeping millions of tones of debree which is nothing more than a pile of rock?
there was nothing to keep or nothing to find
Parent
It's not a matter of what you will achieve with it, but a matter of law that they have to be stored for forensic analysis. Which has not been done and is commonly known as destruction of evidence. Which in turn is punishable by law, but I'm sure we won't see anybody being sued for it.
Parent
every law got exceptions
the sooner they clean the ground zero site the better
Parent
Cleaning ground zero is fine, destroying the material afterwards is not. It's simply part of the criminal code to keep evidence for forensic analysis. There is no exceptions in that.
Parent
well they done that
its like an atome bomb will blow (you know, today they come in suitcase)
and you dispose every debree :d
there is nothing wrong with that :~>

anyway, it doesnt isnt matter, but all those conspericy ppl are annoying :d
Parent
you made no sense, but whatever... eod imo
Parent
you said the terror attack on the building is a crime therefor they must collect everything and store it

but what if there is a terror attack with stuit case atom bomb?
will you collect and store the whole city?
when you give exmple you give them to the limit
of course you wont store the whole city !
there are expections !

what is eod? :d
Parent
This has nothing to do with exceptions. This wasn't an atomic bomb that blew up half a city. You are comparing apples with pears here. The debris on ground zero was collected and stored and disposed of before (independent) analysis could be done. Hell, even the team that FEMA (if you don't know what it is, google it) assembled to analyse the debris was denied access to ground zero and weren't even handed a blueprint of the building until january! That does not ring your "wtf" bell?

And as for EOD, google it.
Parent
but what exectly you can anlyze from ground zero?
you saw the huge of those buildings?
now think its all rubble, all the stuff inside it are rubbles
millions on trillions of stuff are rubble
anlyze will take decedes :d
and they wont find anything cuz there is nothing to find :~<

just like an atomic bomb :~>
ronner, lets make love my bald man, not war :~D
Parent
another exmple is when there is a rly bad shape body in a crowded place with kids or etc
the cops put a blenket on it, but infect they ruin the evidecne
Parent
That is a poor comparison. It doesn't destroy evidence at all when you put a blanket over a dead body. Thorough forensic analysis is still very much possible after that.
Parent
some jury will agree !
some wont !

depends how much you pay for your lowyers :D
Parent
wtf? now it's definitely eod.
Parent
u forgot the things that: that part of the pentagon was empty for changing the building or so

and a building close to the wtc where the fbi + mayor were posted but were moved only 1 week before this thingie + the building collapsed like they would do in a proffesional way when they had to blow up the building :D

etc etc lots of things that dont make sens
Parent
Yes and some are not.So your point proves nothing.
Parent
what do you expect from crossfire ;(
ppl died in that day, let them rest in peace
Parent
nobody rests in peace. for every attack that happens , for every bomb thats dropped . for every person thats killed. news will spread however far. revenage may be made , conspiracy theories are drawn. the biggest stereotype is trying to make people feel bad about people dying who they have never met or dont know. the closer anyone is to someone the more emotion is felt when they die. at the end of today 1000s of people around the world will have died. yet that hasnt even crossed ur mind has it. but when a few 100s of people die in your own country or in western civilisation you care so much. reason for that is because of the media. if all u saw on TV was kids dying from hunger in africa and nothing about the west u would care for them alot more. its just stereotyping.
Parent
i already know about great amount of ppl die every second across the world
but dont forget that there are large amount of ppl given birth around the world every second.

ppl died in the 9/11
and you come and open a truley idiotic journal that can only match Sol statement that HezbAllah are a political party...
Parent
its the internet :<. its what its made for. whine/flame/debate. im simply keeping that alive :< + its fun
Parent
you hurt ppl feelings with those few lines you wrote
tbh now i hate uk even more than i hate it before !

bunch of drunken fat ppl...
Parent
word. btw ur supposed to read the book the other way u jew. noones feelings on this journal are hurt. get over it. it was 6 years ago and because the media keeps playing it u have to follow along with the sterotype . right now behind ur PC u dont have a picture of 9/11 u dont have anything to do with 9/11 in ur house. u dont even speak about it . all u do is when someone sais anything about it u say have some respect. u didnt know anyone in the building. u didnt know anyone on that flight. dam u didnt even know anyone in NEW york . u probably didnt even know anyone in america.

get over the media telling u to feel sorry 6 years after it happend. imagine if the media gave u this impression for every single person that ever died in history. u would commit suicide because ud be so depressed.

thers 10s of millions of people in the UK. and because 1 person is spamming forums u now hate the entire UK. ur so hooked on stereotyps its not even funny. u like in isreal :s the most hated country in the world. or atleast ur flag is isrealien
Parent
first of all im not depressed
second of all what the fuck has the media has to do with it? :x
there was a journal before this that remindes me that today is 9/11...
Parent
I love you nyke, that is all.
Lets listen to the almighty Chomsky:

http://nl.youtube.com/watch?v=BzGd0t8v-d4
Nice journal

watch the movie "Zeitgeist"
agreed

its all about money
Parent
Well I belive that happend in South park... Stan actually took a number 2 in the urinal!
^pala on 11/09/08, 19:39:20 Del | Edit | Reply

what episode / season please?

faggot
Parent
Oh shit me, i am guessing its season 10.
Parent
my goodness you are right
brb
Parent
Yea episode 9 :D

Had to check south park dvd collection fot hat :P
Parent
what episode / season please?
image: slowpoke

DURRRR CONSPIRACY GUISE
Well Said :)
9 - 11 WAS AN INSITE JOB!
thousands of very highly qualified people are conspiracy theorists who now make it their life to try and find out what exactly happend on that day. and u say only college students notice? since it was on tv every person who saw it thinks something is up with it.

like the osama bin laden videos 'sent' from osama are aparently real when there all fake. binladen was eating with his opposite hand, he was wearing his ring on the opposite hand.he was walking normaly when he has a hip problem. :s
"anyone but a bunch of college students"
get ur facts straight then come back =)
everything that you see on TV is manipulated by the media.its never 100 % true in any case. whatever it is so u will never know exactly what is what.
So everything you see in de media is manipulated?
Parent
That really is amusing. You haven't backed up a single thing you've said in this thread and it's quite obvious that the majority of your 'opinion' is taken from Loose Change, Zeitgeist or some other poorly-researched conspiracy theory. For someone who is so keen to repeatedly point out that they'll be attending a university soon you seem blissfully unaware of the rudimentary referencing protocol you're likely to encounter.

http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=af07
Parent
The planes did actual nothing, it were bombs inside the towers.
Patetic comments from some people btw.
Whatever made the towers collapse , it weren't the planes as that is impossible :)
sherlock. i think everyone on the planet knows that :) <3
Parent
"The bigger the lie, the more they believe it"
"A lie repeated 1000 times becomes a true claim."
terrorists..ok..i want to believe
Happy September 11th! How will you celebrate?
9/11 Truthers are fucking idiots.
It explains all<333
"Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it."
- Adolf Hitler
ignorance is bliss
u did not just quote adolf hitler. the second most hated man in modern history after starling. you know that the concentration camps he build were not even for the jews. they were only for disabled people. since he believed if you were of physical disability you were not fit to live. if you were gay you were not fit to live. if you were religious outside of his own u did not deserve to live. then the jews came and he though meh il kill millions of them since i build this thing i might aswell use it. plz...

'imagination is more important than knowledge'

Albert Einstein
Why not quote him? The motive is the same, to deceive & confuse in an effort to sway people to follow your beliefs.

lol..... 'imagination is more important than knowledge' couldn't have said it better myself, cause it's exactly what this is, your imagination at work.
Parent
dont you just love it. brb buying a soda and a chilli dog. fuck im to fat to get into my car. il just order from the 15,000 mcdonalds at the end of my road. wait i might order some intelligence but america seems to have run out of that.

o no he didnt. yes evil zombie, he did
Parent
Typical form of response from somebody who realizes their argument doesn't have a leg to stand on.....start throwing stones.

Once again your intelligence is showing.
Parent
if i threw a stone at u , you would probably just eat it u fast bastard
Parent
My mistake for thinking I was in an somewhat intelligent conversation. Enjoy your clueless existence

/quit
Parent
your general knowledge is pretty...
let someone else write that :~<
Parent
old and known stuff
9/11 was an inside job?

No!
I just ate a chicken nugget
now i want some chicken nuggets :<. skydiddy
Parent
come and get some, your mum did...... OMFG OH NO HE DIDNT :DDDDD
Parent
hahahahahha. yea n1
(wish i had something funny to insert here) give me 5 mins.
Parent
hey its a wall of fucking text
hey its a man with the name stiletto. take ur dress off then pm me
Parent
ridiculous.. all those things have been proven physically incorrect. dont believe everything u see/hear :<
1) the steel structures of the building didn't have to melt in order to make the whole structure collapse, the jet fuel fired in a temperature which easily was enough to weaken the steel core of the towers.

2) what do you refer to by this "maintenance group".. It would have taken DAYS or MONTHS to prepare and place explosives in both of the towers let alone the fact you would've had to ignite them remotely

3) these messages are mostly taken out of context

4) The statement that there wasn't a plane that hit the Pentagon is just ridiculous; how can HUNDREDS of witnesses be wrong? do they all lie?


I'm not taking either side of the attack, whether it was an inside job or an terrorist attack.
But when you get "evidence" out of context and show it to people they'll obviously start thinking the weirdest of things. Even the SIMPLEST of things/facts can be composed in a form that wakens up sceptism.

peace<3
but how can it fall straight to its blueprints without explosives
im not an expert but that did look like controlled demolition + building 7 crashed the same way just because of little fires xd
this thing is largely debated among engineers
Parent
Yes, the fact it came down directly and almost at the speed of freefalling is exciting, rather strange actually. It certainly does look like the building was very well controllably demolished and brought down to ground.
Parent
lets have a look at isreals last attempt at trying to blow up an aircraft in the UK. so it all began one day when an isrealy woke up and thought i know il load a car with explosives and drive into an airport infront of a plane and blow it up but as im doing that i wont configure the bomb properly so it will just leak and set fire to the car while im in it and then get put out by an offduty scottish policeman and get arrested and go to jail for the next 809 years.

and a few days later another isreali woke up and thought i know today il set off a car bomb in a very dense area killing 100s of people but i know il choose the only time to explode that car bomb where not 1 person is near it.

and the best day of them all where all the failing started years ago.some isrealis woke up and thought i know il fill up plastic bottles with liquid explosives to try and fool security into thinking thats its water. yea yea yea and to make it even better il poke a hole in the bottom. but before we go on the plane il dispove of the evidence in a recycling bin which was being filmed by an undercover special ant terrorist attack team.

conclusion: if u want to commit terrorism on the US for the sake of simply embaressing urselfs plz come up with something that actualy works. since the only debateable real thing uve done in 6 years is fly a plane into a building.
=DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD

are you on drugs?
Parent
look it all up urself everything i said there is true. an isreali did drive into an airport like that and get put out put an offduty policeman because the bolb failed to go off.

yes the bottle incident is true. yes the car bomb is true.

look it up urself :<
Parent
=DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD

plz stop
you should be held in a mental hospital :D

brb gonna contacts my friend in the MOSSAD
prepare to get a visit from a small death squad !
Parent
il take this 1

1) the steel structures of the building didn't have to melt in order to make the whole structure collapse, the jet fuel fired in a temperature which easily was enough to weaken the steel core of the towers.

shame that the tower isnt just offices, 3 times at equal intervals up the tower their are special reinforced thick steal beams many ft thick. MUCH thicker than the steel used throughout the rest of the building. and if you watch the footage u can see the explosions lower down at o look the exact point of each of these 3 intervals thers is an explosion 1 after the other as the building falls.

2) what do you refer to by this "maintenance group".. It would have taken DAYS or MONTHS to prepare and place explosives in both of the towers let alone the fact you would've had to ignite them remotely

btw the maintenance group came weeks before the incadent.
the best demolition experts in the world say in interviews if you want to bring a building down like the twin towers came down the ONLY way to do that is through a controlled demolition. they demonstrated exactly what would happen if a plane flew into a big building and it wasnt even close to what happend on 9/11.

o btw everyone that made it out alive who was on the lowest floors that was interviewd . ALL said they heard VERY loud explosions after the plane hit. now enlighten me . unless every single 1 of them was lying. it wasnt like 3/4 of them said they heard explosions and 1/4 didnt. they all did
the structure didnt have to be melted
when steel (in this case that was the building foundation) meet fire its becoming weaker...

the structure is unstable

stop it dude :(
Parent
god you realy have no intelligence about this. stop telling us that we have no intelligence when you have 0 % urself. if you want to bring a building down symetricaly and at freefall speed u cant do it without controlled demoltion. yes the building will fal down. however it will not fall equaly. as the steel isnt melted evenly. it will lean 1 way and then fall. right now get stack 4 bits of single wood in a square. put a bit of wood on the top.now take out the 4 pillars supporting it at different times. the top will fall unevenly and lean. if you took all 4 out at the same time the top will just go at freefall speed straight down.

wake up and grow a brain urself u have no idea how clever the person on the other side of the PC is. and right now hes 100 % over u
Parent
of course
you already proven your brain by saying stuff you dont know

you just discover that 9/11 was a conspiracy !

idiot...
im going to watch Dr.who
atlist 1 good thing from uk :d
Parent
straight after the twin towers collaped i looked into conspiracy theories and have been for 5 years. wake up plz. your still dreaming cause thers no way ur that stupid.
Parent
thats like watching 5 years of science fiction movies
and believe its the truth :D

get well mate !
Parent
So people wouldnt notice masive wiring around the office, which are always around when you blow up buildings?
Parent
are u stupid? bombs dont need to be blown up by wires u idiot. lol ur clearly stuck 20 years ago when TNT was used with wires and the box with the lever u push down in the shape of a T to blow up buildings. wake up
Parent
For a demolition of a building TNT is far to raw and not precise enough. To let such a building blow and collapse exactly like it did and you want it, you need controlled demolition.
Parent
yes the fact that they heard explosions is something i cannot make up an excuse :D:D lol

but i tell it again, i'm not on the "official" or "unofficial" side of things. :P
Parent
i have nothing to say about the explosions heard as i don't know anything about them for sure,

but check my reply to cainer about the windows blowing out


edit: take it easy guys, this debation to die for :D discussing sophisticatedly isn't hard, too much flame and insulting in this community already :-)
Parent
Don't watch those conspiracy movies, cause they twist facts even more than regular media.
we will never know


its like kennedy .. we will never know
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tD5WlQ54Sg0

eminem could be onto something there,.,
Quotehey its 9/11 and i expect this journal to last maybe 2 minutes cause some admin who didnt even know 1 person inside those 2 buildings will delete it and say its disrespectful although u didnt know anyone in there.


First of all, why would an admin delete this? What is disrespectful about this post?

Second, don't assume so much. My best friends sister, whom I know pretty well, was at the time an employee for one of the company's inside the WTC and luckily got into work late and just got out of the subway as the 2nd plane hit so she was lucky to grab a cab the fuck out of there. We didn't hear from her until she reached her apartment again, which was hours later, so you can imagine the shit we wen't through until that time.

Im not gonna comment on the conspiracy theory as we will never know what really happened. It wasn't a bunch of arabs though and it sure as hell wasn't a bigass plane that went into the pentagon, I can tell you that much.
i kinda feared going online today. all the crap and whining about 9/11 from these politicians. right before elections too.
Parent
"i kinda feared going online today"

: DDDDDD
Parent
blame illuminatis
Heres a conspiracy for you!

The president of USA is controlled by the patriots!

loooooooooooooooooooooooooooool MGS2 FTW
the president of the united states is a very strong fundamental christian. hes almost what we call an extremeist in his believes. he believes in the end of the world. he believes in god. so if the end of the world was coming through his believes we should not try to stop it.

that is not a false statement he is a fundamental christian and does believe those things. :) he has said all this in statements and interviews.
Parent
QuoteAlso, how do you explain the plain part's up there? How do you explain uniforms, body parts?


What plane parts? Please give me one photo of the crashsite at the pentagon that shows planeparts.

QuoteThe plane wings did not fully penetrate facade, in fact the wings were alredy partly off before the plance actually did hit into the building.


Where the hell did you get the information that the wings were already partially blown off before it hit? Can you point me to anything that shows this happened and can you tell me where exactly these wings have been found? Cuz if they were partially blown off before it hit then I'm sure they didn't pulvarize in midair.

QuotePlane going straight down.. Was going close to speed of sound, it did impact to soft land with massive speed, power of the hit is massive.. Explains the "small" crater it did make.


124ft wingspan does not make a 30 to 40 ft crater. In fact it would make quite a big fucking mess. Are you suggesting it torpedoed itself deep into the ground? If that's the case I bet tons of stuff is to be found then!

Quote2001 cellphones work up until about 15km


Rofl? Getting a signal from anything above 10000 feet is already quite a miracle.
Back to top