PC specs

by Prydz • 12 Oct 2008, 18:45 • Journals
- intel pentium d915 2.8 GHZ (dual core)
- 2 GB Ram
- ati x1950 pro 256 mb
- OCZ Stealthxtream 600W
- 160 GB SATA
- dvd writer


1. Are these specs worth €165 ? (2nd hand)
2. Can I play ET stable with this computer? (goldrush, radar etc in 6vs6)
Comments
32
▼
squalli 12 Oct 2008, 19:46
much more
▼
Lover 12 Oct 2008, 19:47
for that price i guess its good
▼
vectra 12 Oct 2008, 19:49
i don't recommend that x1950 card,i had it and it overheats so easy. i was able to play BF2 like 20minutes and my monitor shut down.
▼
Deactivated5446 12 Oct 2008, 19:50
It's not worth it! Give me the phone number of the person in charge and I'll have a serious conversation with him!
▼
ng 12 Oct 2008, 19:50
one word: core 2 quad

edit: oh that are actually 3 :D
▼
Ambrosia 12 Oct 2008, 19:50
I doubt it that u will be able tokeep 125 stable.. ( but idk )
▼
squalli 12 Oct 2008, 19:57
You seriously paid over 400€ for your processor?
Parent
▼
im a tree 12 Oct 2008, 21:04
funniest thing is that he seems to be running it stock, in real world (non SSE4) applications my q6600 will be outperforming it :E
Parent
▼
jetro 12 Oct 2008, 20:01
You're kidding me right.
Parent
▼
dejx 12 Oct 2008, 20:03
pb suck nowadays
Parent
▼
Paintrain 12 Oct 2008, 19:52
what PC do you have now? With those specs you better use a relatively small crt screen with 800x600.
▼
im a tree 12 Oct 2008, 21:05
small? 21" 800x600 $$$$
Parent
▼
Paintrain 12 Oct 2008, 21:21
I doubt that he will be able to hold 125 fps steady with those specs
Parent
▼
Keytaro 12 Oct 2008, 20:49
Definitely yes.
▼
im a tree 12 Oct 2008, 21:06
Huh, with PB enabled in 6v6?

Perfo has a 3.2ghz Pentium and can't handle goldrush on 125fps.

I call bullshit.
Parent
▼
Necuz 12 Oct 2008, 21:56
What the hell is PB doing these days? My crappy Athlon 64 3200+ used to be enough for a smooth ET experience...
Parent
▼
im a tree 12 Oct 2008, 21:58
yeah my 3000 also, these days if it's 6v6 and you're outside it's impossible to keep 125fps on that spec :\

fuck pb
Parent
▼
Necuz 12 Oct 2008, 22:12
Even in Linux?
Parent
▼
im a tree 12 Oct 2008, 22:17
nope, linux isn't plagued by the new processes/services PnkBstrA/B which run while you play games
Parent
▼
Necuz 12 Oct 2008, 22:19
So, what's the problem then? :D
Parent
▼
im a tree 12 Oct 2008, 22:32
vent emulation still sucks and not enough people use mumble
Parent
▼
rsp 12 Oct 2008, 22:59
I can have stable 125 everywhere but sp_deliverys corridors near axis spawn :XD
not kidding
Parent
▼
Keytaro 13 Oct 2008, 16:50
yes.

Used to play with a AMD 2800+ 2,08 GHz (one core), a Radeon 9200, 768MB DDR and I've always had stable 76 fps everywhere (except some parts of radar) without any problems.

so with the pc he's aiming he would easily get 125
Parent
▼
im a tree 13 Oct 2008, 17:29
multiple cores don't really affect et's performance :\

i doubt he could maintain 125 stable, if you think otherwise then your definition of stable is simply wrong
Parent
▼
Keytaro 13 Oct 2008, 17:33
We'll see, but if he configures well his pc, he won't have any problems imo ^.^
Parent
▼
Nickk 12 Oct 2008, 20:56
9800 pro is what i got :)
▼
PetriP-TNT 12 Oct 2008, 22:06
You should be able to play with 125fps stable on every map with that kind of setup.
▼
im a tree 12 Oct 2008, 22:17
hey man, this isn't 2006 anymore, we have pnkbstra/b these days

don't give advice if you don't know jack about the subject, thanks
Parent
▼
PetriP-TNT 18 Oct 2008, 13:16
I dont have pnkbstra/b you cocksucker
Parent
▼
im a tree 18 Oct 2008, 16:19
enjoy emulating ventrilo ;_;
Parent
▼
inf1sticjezor 12 Oct 2008, 22:30
you are able to keep stable 125 fps. hf
Back to top