just wondering...

yes

Well my clan is not high++. Around med+.

Well if there is official I trye to watch what tax enemy uses on defense and attack. Will have little picture of what they are doing.

Changing attack tactics if there are like "flag or plant" if I see they have less guys defending plant I will put more people attacking plant... but its rare situation.

That's professional!

We'd change the way we play according to how the opponent did, but not to the extent of full tactics, just some different calls on vent before the game :o)

Let's take goldrush for an example, some teams use the back more often or rush in with 2/3 people, so one extra landmine at the back against that certain team can be crucial. Same goes for Radar.

Quote

We have the players to beat them 4:0 if we can get it right on the night so we will see.

Whahahaha.

Yes, If there is a ettv replay about the enemy, I go and record the map and watch where they rush out etc. And watch if they use mg etc, can be really useful and can decide a match.(sometimes i use it only for personal tactic only)
For newschoolers like you lio it can be hard to understand :!

When I was co-leader of Polar/Evolve/Junk52 I watched all the demos of the next opponent I could find and we changed our tactics accordingly. Haven't done it to that extent for any other team, but knowing how teams defend/attack certain maps is always useful and can change the times set by minutes, which could be vital.

A good example is old oasis in the u96d era. You had no idea how a random team would play it - internal def, semi-external or external def. If you knew the team you could adapt to their def much more easily. Or another example, certain teams have radar CP+main defence tacs that are weak to a well timed attack at main, others you're better off just battering at the CP.

lio with his porn-penis

not that much, just small gameplay changes if we know something about the opponent but it kinda comes automatically no need to make focus on it

back in the days I remember playing p!mpd/snype in goldrush, they had a really odd defence (but which worked very well) and first times we simply got bashed but later when we focused on how they play it we managed to find ways to outplay them (which led them doing same about our new tax). Really pain in the ass when you find out one attack route and then they take focuse on it too.

Also u96d and parodia needed some different tax. In supply we kinda studied important stuff (where raveneye plays, how he plays, how to kill him). I think we even made once mortar places for Nonix just to focuse on raveneye :D. Overally, I think it worked pretty good and it gave us chance of winning in officials (well, didnt get more than 3 rounds from parodia but still xD) and what with the normal gameplay wouldve been impossible to to.

I think there is no need to do that kind of stuff at the moments, there aint that special players around - except for aimers like maus, wiesiek where you need just to avoid getting backraped them. And for the people like wiadro it would not work since he is able to kill you wherever you camped. (its like more when he nades you and you try to dodge it)

not rly.. propably different attack tactics to attack with tactiv a or b or c .. but not for every team :o

i had a dream that you were a girl with a real big camel toe