G7 a fucking joke

by zeec • 3 Dec 2008, 13:11 • Journals
What the fuck happend to the G7 list? just take a look :s SK is 1st even tho mTw played a lot better than them :s


1. SK Gaming
2. mTw.AMD
3. fnatic
4. Meet Your Makers
5. mousesports
6. Made in Brazil
7. eSTRO
8. GamePlay
9. emuLate
10. Team Alternate

SK won against mTw at dreamhack and thats about it. And if you look on it mTw became the richest team in 2008.

1. $131.423 - mTw
2. $118.638 - Mousesports
3. $94.359 - SK Gaming
4. $87.700 - fnatic
5. $80.885 - Meet Your Makers
6. $77.500 - eSTRO
7. $44.750 - Made in Brazil
8. $22.891 - Team ALTERNATE
9. $18.000 - SK Ladies
10. $12.626 - n!faculty


G7 is a fucking joke. I'll bet its bds fault :s
Comments
8
▼
zeec 3 Dec 2008, 13:21
QuoteAchievements:
won alot $$$$$ by palying enemy territory


Damn someone is neerd tooo
▼
zeec 3 Dec 2008, 13:25
I never complained about nerds


:___________________________D
▼
Deactivated5784 3 Dec 2008, 13:31
they are rich bitch !
▼
zafoga 3 Dec 2008, 13:33
131k $


expected more ...
▼
Deactivated5446 3 Dec 2008, 13:43
I'd assume that it's what they won only, regardless of advertising or any other money.
Parent
▼
Ati_ 3 Dec 2008, 13:33
It's like the TLR Ranking list, fake-experts and a shitlist, atleast TLR didn't release a shitlist every month, but they did promise it though (HMMM EGOBOOST ?)
▼
Cash 3 Dec 2008, 13:47
I had the opportunity to examine their system in the back end. It is a strange system of points being based on teams attending, and the very odd distribution of points over the top 5.
Moreover, there is a depreciation of points over time, which explains why fnatic is dropping so hard. Why mTw and SK are so odd I don't know. I didn't expect this either.
▼
CS4f1 3 Dec 2008, 14:50
I had a little time, so:

Dreamhack - attended top10 teams:
- SK (478.86 pts) after 8% depreciation: 440,55 pts -> Nov. pts: 579,24 (+138,69)
- mTw (510.00 pts) after 8% depreciation: 469,20 pts -> Nov. pts: 561,66 (+92,46)
- MYM (401.29 pts) after 8% depreciation: 369,19 pts -> Nov. pts: 415,42 (+46,22)
- fnatic (535.42 pts) after 8% depreciation: 492,59 pts -> Nov. pts: 523,41 (+30,82)
- mouz (391.61 pts) after 8% depreciation: 360,28 pts -> Nov. pts: 364,88 (+~5 pts)
- MiBR (292.89 pts) after 8% depreciation: 269,46 pts -> Nov. pts: 274,05 (+~5 pts)

Event value=2610,07 (based on rankings of October)
Really given out (based on the rankings of November): 138,69+92,46+46,22+30,82=308,19 pts + 5-5 pts to mouz and MiBR
308,19/2610,07=0,118077=>11,81% of the event value

According to their presentation ranking modell gives
1st (45%) = 1174,53 pts x 11,81% = 138,72 (equal with the number above)
2nd (30%) = 783,02 pts x 11,81% = 92,48 (equal with the number above)
3rd (15%) = 391.51 pts x 11,81% = 46,23 (equal with the number above)
4th (10%) = 261,01 pts x 11,81% = 30,83 (equal with the number above)
of the event value and 5-8th get +5 points, because event value is big enough. So, MiBR and mouz got + 5 points.

So, the rate is correct, the only question is: why exactly 11,81%?

Maybe this % value controls the followings, too:
- prizemoney (in connection with motivation)
- deviation (events in the end of year get higher event value because players/teams have higher ranking points in the end of year)

If yes, then I think everything fine.
Back to top