lol cc5 question

by psycheee • 5 Dec 2008, 21:18 • Journals
@ cc5 will pb be enabled?

if so HF WITH LAGGG
Comments
35
▼
Hexagon 5 Dec 2008, 21:18
lol, i dont see why it would...
▼
GoodGuyGary 5 Dec 2008, 21:20
they should disable PB and if they're too paranoid, run anti3. only takes 1/2 megabytes of your RAM.
▼
Deactivated5880 5 Dec 2008, 21:20
PB FOR OHHH SHIT THIS FUCKING PB LAGS SO MUCH
▼
Fizmo 5 Dec 2008, 21:21
they better do, cc5 will be full of hackers
▼
Cash 5 Dec 2008, 21:23
There is a better anti cheat there than PB. That is Adacore and me, especially on the punishment side ;)
▼
Bulld0g 5 Dec 2008, 21:29
oh yes and they can find all, trust me :)
Parent
▼
KIPE 5 Dec 2008, 21:30
blowjobs incoming
Parent
▼
Cash 5 Dec 2008, 21:37
is that the latest trend for 2008? We do it old-fashioned way.
Parent
▼
GoodGuyGary 5 Dec 2008, 21:30
no offense, but i doubt you can catch anyone who will prepare his hack to load without chams and the adjusted aimbot to work on the combination of 2 keys (example: ctrl+mouse1). Just use anti3, tell chaplja/quad to give you the new one 1 hour before the first games imo :p
Parent
▼
Cash 5 Dec 2008, 21:35
it could make sense. We normally run it without pb, but there are very simple measures to check those who are suspicious. Moreover, there are nice methods to check what is put on a pc. Also at the end of the day or after deletion.

We busted one cheater on LAN at cdc3, so it does work ;)
Parent
▼
GoodGuyGary 5 Dec 2008, 21:36
ah i know what you mean :p

the guy caught on cdc3 was the german guy that had cheat cvars? still have his nick? :p
Parent
▼
Cash 5 Dec 2008, 21:38
well there is also another and he was simply stupid enough to have it in his config.
Parent
▼
GoodGuyGary 5 Dec 2008, 21:45
who are the cheaters, have you ever announced who they were? :p
Parent
▼
Cash 5 Dec 2008, 22:24
Check the prize ceremony vod of CDC3 ;) I forgot his name, but he got a special award.
Parent
▼
im a tree 5 Dec 2008, 22:02
if someone motivated _seriously_ wanted to hack on LAN it would be nigh impossible to stop them, but luckily you'll only get morons trying to adapt a way to hack under those conditions.
Parent
▼
Cash 5 Dec 2008, 22:21
True, anything is possible. But the odds are still in my favor. He needs to be undetected for the entire weekend, I only need to bust him once. The consequences of being busted on LAN are also a bit harder when it leaks out. :)
Parent
▼
Gabt 5 Dec 2008, 21:42
yeah, nice one, now some little hackers sitting reading this, and a light bulb popped on above his head!
Parent
▼
GoodGuyGary 5 Dec 2008, 21:44
they still will get caught by cash's method ^^
Parent
▼
ScaTmaN 5 Dec 2008, 21:24
they will disbable it for sure .. its a lan , if anyone try to cheat @ lan , then HF :D
▼
GoodGuyGary 5 Dec 2008, 21:34
its possible, if i was a cheater i would do it.

the point is anyone can cheat with PB on LAN, it wont detect private hax at lan, use anti3!
Parent
▼
hvK 5 Dec 2008, 21:40
You seriously love anti3 that much?
Parent
▼
GoodGuyGary 5 Dec 2008, 21:42
yes, we have a nice sex life.
Parent
▼
Deactivated7001 5 Dec 2008, 21:39
Actually, quite easy....
Parent
▼
ScaTmaN 5 Dec 2008, 22:08
i have no clue about hacks so dunno :S
Parent
▼
Quazz 5 Dec 2008, 21:42
i am going to cheat at cc5
▼
Domi 5 Dec 2008, 21:46
on who?
▼
AjaK 5 Dec 2008, 22:02
i am not going to cc5
▼
Cris 5 Dec 2008, 22:04
they should disable PB and if they're too paranoid, run anti3. only takes 1/2 megabytes of your RAM.
▼
Darren 5 Dec 2008, 23:43
its easy to shield your screen at cc5 i presume without making it too suspicious, pb will most definately be enabled.
Back to top