musicplayer

by kazzam • 2 Feb 2009, 20:15 • Journals
Can anyone recommend me a smart, stable and less memory using musicplayer ?

I've got winamp, but are there better players ?


image: thx
Comments
45
▼
Smasher 2 Feb 2009, 20:17
media player classic!
▼
sean 2 Feb 2009, 20:17
foobar
▼
dEzIrE 2 Feb 2009, 20:23
ITUNES

":D"
▼
Deactivated6139 2 Feb 2009, 21:08
Itunes ftw !
Parent
▼
dEzIrE 2 Feb 2009, 21:21
bu its pretty much CPU eating :D
Parent
▼
Deactivated6139 2 Feb 2009, 21:30
yes i know :( but i haz mAster pC !
Parent
▼
Trevize 2 Feb 2009, 20:24
foobar but its not as good as everyone says. its just different, thats why so much pc nerd like it.
▼
Niki0o 2 Feb 2009, 20:31
Well you got something BAD to say about it?
Parent
▼
sean 2 Feb 2009, 20:35
I used it because it was lightweight, it ran really well on my old shit pc . So whats the fucking problem?
Parent
▼
Rewolf 2 Feb 2009, 20:36
Wow, calm down big man, no need to get offensive.
Parent
▼
sean 2 Feb 2009, 20:37
Go and stone yourself into a coma.
Parent
▼
Rewolf 3 Feb 2009, 02:36
why would I :<
Parent
▼
Rewolf 2 Feb 2009, 20:36
AIMP2 is still nicer imo :<
Parent
▼
decem 2 Feb 2009, 20:55
explain.
Parent
▼
Trevize 2 Feb 2009, 20:57
explain what? its absolutely not better than winamp, its just for some people to think its unique.
Parent
▼
decem 2 Feb 2009, 21:00
in what way do you consider winamp to be better? in eating resources? in slowness? in customization? in larger user base, thus having more skins available?
Parent
▼
Trevize 2 Feb 2009, 21:02
FUCK IT man, i ve never said winamp is better... i say both are good, EQUAL. but some idiot use foobar only coz its became a style @ nerds.
Parent
▼
decem 2 Feb 2009, 21:04
how can it be equal if it beats winamp in most of the aspects? the fact that you get annoyed for some people preferring foobar over anything is funny, but believe me, there's a reason why people say that.
Parent
▼
Trevize 2 Feb 2009, 21:16
coz it uses less cpu? LOL what a big deal! starts in less miliseconds? OMG! can you auto tag ur mp3s? I couldnt find that on Foobar
Parent
▼
decem 2 Feb 2009, 21:22
foobar2000 freedb tagger

anyway, since youre not up for intellectual conversation, I'll leave you alone, retard
Parent
▼
im a tree 4 Feb 2009, 00:23
-up +capable
Parent
▼
decem 4 Feb 2009, 00:26
tried to be nice.
Parent
▼
snusman 2 Feb 2009, 20:26
foobar2000
▼
shitbox 2 Feb 2009, 20:37
image: old_radio


dont need foobar, even winamp.
▼
dEzIrE 2 Feb 2009, 20:40
no cd player!
Parent
▼
shitbox 2 Feb 2009, 20:46
only mp3 retardo !!
Parent
▼
pala 2 Feb 2009, 20:41
probably none knows of xion, i use it for ever since i found it, over a year
▼
loazis 2 Feb 2009, 20:44
Using winamp, like the sound and look.
▼
alko 2 Feb 2009, 20:45
iTunes F T W
▼
decem 2 Feb 2009, 20:55
foobar, clearly.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aX60NNaT5E0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yQpVnjN4WoU

image: foobar
▼
loazis 2 Feb 2009, 21:10
Is there a difference in soundquality? That's more important to me then that little bit of more memory usage? :)
Parent
▼
decem 2 Feb 2009, 21:13
I havent really noticed much difference between the sound quality on different players, but its been said foobar has the best quality.
Parent
▼
im a tree 4 Feb 2009, 00:26
I use the noise sharpening DSP in foobar at about 50% or so
Parent
▼
cl4ym4n 2 Feb 2009, 21:24
Foobar2000 v0.9.6.1 vs. Winamp v2.91

image: capture_2009-02-02_21-19-45
▼
im a tree 4 Feb 2009, 00:25
you can't compare old winamp to foobar, it has like 10% of the features

still a ballin app though, I'd actually use winamp2, but I wouldn't touch the new winamp with a fucking polevault
Parent
▼
cl4ym4n 4 Feb 2009, 00:30
He asked for a smart, stable and less memory using musicplayer and not of a next-gen mediaplayer center with dolbysurroundprologicthxroundhousekicksound and tons of features...

Compared to Winamp5 Foobar would win for sure, but who needs that shit when you only want to play some music with a player where you dont need to buy additional ram?
Parent
▼
im a tree 4 Feb 2009, 00:44
for me a music player without a music library and customizable global keyboard shortcuts is useless
Parent
Back to top