CF Admin Election
•
4 Sep 2009, 16:22
•
Journals
An election is a formal decision-making process by which a population chooses an individual to hold public office.[1] Elections have been the usual mechanism by which modern representative democracy since the 17th century. [1] Elections may fill offices in the legislature, sometimes in the executive and judiciary, and for regional and local government. This process is also used in many other private and business organizations, from clubs to voluntary associations and corporations.
The universal use of elections as a tool for selecting representatives in modern democracies is in contrast with the practice in the democratic archetype, ancient Athens. Elections were considered an oligarchic institution and most political offices were filled using sortition, also known as allotment, by which officeholders were chosen by lot.
Electoral reform describes the process of introducing fair electoral systems where they are not in place, or improving the fairness or effectiveness of existing systems. Psephology is the study of results and other statistics relating to elections (especially with a view to predicting future results).
Sounds nice no
This is the way to go ppl, all rise and demand the removal of these Communist, that use this site 4 personal gain (Tosspot) and maybe just maybe this site will have more clean players then cheaters once again.
The universal use of elections as a tool for selecting representatives in modern democracies is in contrast with the practice in the democratic archetype, ancient Athens. Elections were considered an oligarchic institution and most political offices were filled using sortition, also known as allotment, by which officeholders were chosen by lot.
Electoral reform describes the process of introducing fair electoral systems where they are not in place, or improving the fairness or effectiveness of existing systems. Psephology is the study of results and other statistics relating to elections (especially with a view to predicting future results).
Sounds nice no
This is the way to go ppl, all rise and demand the removal of these Communist, that use this site 4 personal gain (Tosspot) and maybe just maybe this site will have more clean players then cheaters once again.
Also, we don't need 20 admins for a site with a userbase of about 400 active(posting!) people.
Owned?
A good admin you never even realize is an admin, which is the polar opposite mentality of some those throwing out warning points every ten minutes.
Also what hkrep said.
Also also, voting admins is a terrible idea.
Don't even want to know what happens when we unleash the power of democracy on this community
just kill all those retards.
Ups, you're excluded, h3h3.
;S
Though the inactive good guys aren't a problem; Arachon, foonr, raza, redeye, ana, adacore, cash, helgoat - they never did nobody no harm.
I'm waiting for Toss' call btw, np4me.
but honestly I also think we need less admins, just keep the better ones around :/
For me, crossfire should include several people able to give a decent coverage and someone who could clear cheating scums around. Just look at the news section and try to answer on question: How many news has current crew actually provided?
I guess that's the difference between XF now and what it used to be. Users realized news on the site was contributed by anyone. Now however, I fear many people think this is simply a bog-standard news website.