thanks Vanhaomena & Sample
•
22 Oct 2009, 22:12
•
Journals
for 50/50 poker taxes
made my moneys grow up high
from 0$ to 0$
50/50 really works <3
one love finnish brothers
made my moneys grow up high
from 0$ to 0$
50/50 really works <3
one love finnish brothers
Personally I prefer 70/30, but it's a bit risky isn't it ?
write a tutorial or somethin :x
plx
its about analysing your opponent, changing your playingstyle and calculating your winningchances
dunno why its known as variance in the poker scene, but its like doing a cointoss, where you also wont have any variance (mathematically).
the only variance is the variance of your wins (but that doesnt depends on your cards), so at the end of the day (mathematically spoken) you just can be sure that the of your wins/losses (per statistical weight of your account of money) got some variance.
means: If you are loosing 100 games, the probability of winning the next hand is higher (due to what i said about the variance) then winning a hand after maybe 50 losses
and thats maybe, why you are playing with a 50/50 system. You can loose every match during the next 3 weeks, but due to the variance of your winning-distribution you will succeed with that system after 3 years (just because u played enough hands to get some use out of the variance)
Wat
"dunno why its known as variance in the poker scene, but its like doing a cointoss, where you also wont have any variance (mathematically)."
WAT?
"the only variance is the variance of your wins (but that doesnt depends on your cards)"
Wat. Yes it does.
"so at the end of the day (mathematically spoken) you just can be sure that the of your wins/losses (per statistical weight of your account of money) got some variance."
Didn't understand, sorry
"means: If you are loosing 100 games, the probability of winning the next hand is higher (due to what i said about the variance) then winning a hand after maybe 50 losses"
This is simply false
"and thats maybe, why you are playing with a 50/50 system."
Damn right
"You can loose every match during the next 3 weeks, but due to the variance of your winning-distribution you will succeed with that system after 3 years (just because u played enough hands to get some use out of the variance)"
Yes, a winning player is more likely to show a profit after 3 years than in 3 weeks.
"means: If you are loosing 100 games, the probability of winning the next hand is higher (due to what i said about the variance) then winning a hand after maybe 50 losses"
no, just no.. stop..