Math Question SOLVED

Aight, have exams of maths tommorow and I have forgotten how to solve this question. Didn't wrote the solution down :/

x² - (k - 5) - (k + 2) . (2k - 3) = 0

Only thing you can do is to solve it with the discriminant but if I do that, I have sth like this : D = -7k² -14k + 49
Another second degree equation :/ Fucked up.

Tnx for help,

- Piegie


EDIT : Found the solution, but I still don't have any idea how they got there..

x1 = - k + 5 x2 = 2k - 3
Comments
45
I think the solution will be a group of possibilities? that you have to make a graphic wich mentions all the "dots" of possible solutions
It's a 2nd degree equation so there can only be 0,1,2 or infinite amount of solutions
Parent
but he has 2 variables in one equation -_-
Parent
no, u c, K = constant only x is variable
Parent
oh ok, didn't know that
Parent
x²-2k-2k²+11=0
x=wurzel aus:2k+2k²-11
x²-2k²-2k+11=0 ....
Parent
seems like u lost -2k²
Parent
ye sry woke up 1 min ago^^
Parent
no need to sry.
Parent
God, this is the same shit I get aswell now in math, I really hate them =D
i fail in math so np.
use the MITTERNACHTSFORMEL !
1 + 2 = 3
x² - (k - 5) - (k + 2) . (2k - 3) = 0

Ik denk dat je gwn de k & x² naar de overkant moet doen, en hem van toestandsteken veranderen. en alles normale cijfers aan de linkerkant.

Als het om vergelijkingen gaat.

ik ga zelf niet beginnen denken ;)
x²=(k-5)+(k+2)*(2k-3)
<=>x²=k-5+3k²-3k+4k-6
<=>x²-2k²+2k+11=0

x² is always positive so you don't care "x" can be a number from R

Then you have to do the discriminant with -2k²+2k+11=0

I'm not really sure.
how did you get 3k² from k*2k? :X
Parent
Oops... edited thanks.
Parent
51fh156dg
could you check it in your notebook?
you've got this:
x² - (k - 5) - (k + 2) * (2k - 3) = 0
or this:
x² - (k - 5)x - (k + 2) * (2k - 3) = 0
x² - (k - 5) - (k + 2) . (2k - 3) = 0

x²= (k - 5) + (k + 2) . (2k - 3)

k = 11

np4me
last one is a *, so u cant solve it like that :(
Parent
Kom pgii, ge hebt maar 1 constante en tis uwen x2 die ge moet hebben .... ge gaat nu toch niet zeggen da ge da niet weet :s
Kweet de som en het product vd vergelijking, en ik moet 2 oplossingen hebben -> discriminant is positief. Kga m'n uitwerking e kji opschrijven.

D = ( k -5 )² - 4. (( k + 2 ) . ( 2k - 3 ))
= k² - 10k + 25 - 4 . ( 2k² + k - 6 )
= k² - 10k + 25 - 8k² - 4 + 24
= -7k² - 14k + 49

En nu graak k nie mee verder :/ Oftewel moest ik het niet distributief uitgewerkt hebben.
'k kan nu ook geen merkwaardig product daarop toepassen. Als het zo was geweest wel : k² - 14k + 49.

Me haz no id.
Parent
now tell me where you need this shit irl (except of school etc)
x²-(k-5)-(k+ 2)*(2k-3)=0 |-x²

-(k-5)-((k+2)*(2k-3))=-x²
-k+5-((k+2)*(2k-3))=-x²
-k+5-(2k²-3k+4k-6)=-x²
-k+5-2k²+3k-4k+6=-x²
-2k²+3k-4k-k+5+6=-x²
-2k²-2k+11=-x² |*(-1)
2k²+2k-11=x²

?
as i said
x= wurzel aus:2k²+2k-11

you failed at: -k+3k-4k=-2k
Parent
I need the solutions of this equitation, and since the discriminant is positive, I have 2 solutions.

Btw, found the answers but still not how to them.
its has to be positive aswer in a minute think im right going trough it again^^
edit: image: readyk
how to:
x²-k+5-(2k²-3k+4k-6)=0
x²-k+5-2k²+3k-4k+6=0
x²-2k-2k²+11=0 /+2k+2k²-11
x²=2k+2k²-11
Parent
u need 2 answers, since the discriminant is positive :d My problem is just, I get another second degree equation in the discriminant :/
Parent
its allways +/- the root sry forgot to paint
Parent
if its x² u could set the term - aswell u understand? so its + and - the solution
Parent
ahahahahhahaha TOO EASY FOR ME ! FRENCHIES ARE HIGH+ IN MATH AND PHYSIK
frenchies are low+ in english though
Parent
-7k² -14k + 49

-7k(k+2) + 49
(k+2) (49-7k)
k+2=0 v 49-7k=0
k=-2 v -7k=-49 /:(-7)
___________ k=2


? :D


edit: no lol delta doesnt work here.
so after ppl dont believe my result i proof it:

x² - (k - 5) - (k + 2) * (2k - 3) = 0 //// -x²

- (k - 5) - (k + 2) * (2k - 3) = -x² //// * (-1)

(k - 5) + (k + 2) * (2k - 3) = x² ----> you dont need to do anything just put this (k - 5) + (k + 2) * (2k - 3) in to the main equation, don't make your work more hard just make it as easy as you can.

it will looks like

(k - 5) + (k + 2) * (2k - 3) - (k - 5) - (k + 2) * (2k - 3) = 0 ---> lets make it easier

k - 5 + 2k² -3k +4k -6 - k - 5 - 2k² - 3k + 4k -6 = 0

2k - 5 - 6 -5 -6 = 0

2k - 22 = 0

2k = 22

k = 11


so final check

(11 - 5) + (11 +2) * (11*2 -3) - (11 -5) - (11 + 2) * (11*2 -3) = 0

6 + 247 - 6 - 247 = 0

0 = 0

which means i was right
Quote(k - 5) + (k + 2) * (2k - 3) - (k - 5) - (k + 2) * (2k - 3) = 0 ---> lets make it easier

k - 5 + 2k² -3k +4k -6 - k - 5 - 2k² - 3k + 4k -6 = 0



- (k - 5) = - k + 5 ?

would make k = 6

1 + 72 - 18 + 24 - 6 - 6 + 5 - 72 - 18 + 24 - 6 = 0
- 35 + 48 - 13 = 0
- 35 + 35 = 0
0 = 0
Parent
ohh i failed there :| i kill myself :(
Parent
don't worry, you did not fail entirely : let's call that a co-op work!
Parent
oky i agree ! :SD
Parent
Back to top