CB digging themself a bigger hole?

by R0SS • 26 Dec 2009, 16:34 • Journals
Just before i post this link i would like to say that im neutral on the whole CB vs ESL scenario. However i do believe that CB arent helping their cause in the past few months illustrated by a number of posts from various contributors. Anyway, for those of u that dont follow cod4 - the team that cb are giving a red card to are 1 of the top teams in the game. They always play cb ladders - think they are ranked top in 5on5 ladder and always compete in ec etc and cb decided to do this. Worse than donex

http://clanbase.ggl.com/forum.php?fid=2869302&zid=00FFFFB6&lid=9717

HoHoHo late merry xmas x
Comments
69
▼
Deactivated5258 26 Dec 2009, 16:36
HAHAHAH :-PPPPPPPPPPPPP TR00 R0SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS :DdDdDddDDdd
▼
mikeTHEbike 26 Dec 2009, 16:38
MR.PC DIRECTOR?
▼
Noorgrin 26 Dec 2009, 16:39
they are #1 CB Ladder atm btw :)

http://clanbase.ggl.com/rating.php?lid=7514

And yes, retarded decision by the cb admins...
▼
Sainted 26 Dec 2009, 18:36
If strict means retarded, then yes. But playing with a player who is not on your APL is pretty retarded too. The sad thing is that there's no reason why top teams would want to play CB over leagues which do have prize money - like the ESL, otherwise teams might be more careful not to violate rules.
Parent
▼
Noorgrin 26 Dec 2009, 20:51
well sry but a banning a team from a EuroCup 1/2 final cause a player who is already 14days in the lineup but not on the APL is imo a bit retarded (in ESL he wouldn't have been allowed to play for 10days for example)... but yes they broke a rule, still giving them a red card for that is way over the top imo...

+ that "bad nickname" thing for the other team is really retarded sry... had the same shit also in ET few years ago if i remember right... that's so lol...everyone can see from the GUID who the player is... so plz...
Parent
▼
DominickDecocco 26 Dec 2009, 16:40
retarded cb as always
▼
zuzu 26 Dec 2009, 16:40
CB ET admins more reasonable than cod4,dontf ollow community but i play cod2 ESL and they are stricter with rules

got penalty points for saying fuck u in game :( (was sayign it to my friend)
▼
Kevin 26 Dec 2009, 18:39
we should do an event, we let a cod supervisor admin an enemy territory match



would be awesome
Parent
▼
mst 26 Dec 2009, 16:46
rules are rules

OH FUCKING WAIT
▼
ENSJQM 26 Dec 2009, 16:47
rules are rules :)
▼
Mauro 26 Dec 2009, 16:50
the admin is slovenian , no offense but nuff said .
▼
danL 26 Dec 2009, 17:59
the admin is slovakian and you're belgian, nuff said
Parent
▼
Mauro 26 Dec 2009, 21:30
.si .sk .hu all thirdies to me

":D"
Parent
▼
Dreamweaver 27 Dec 2009, 15:16
then you are fucking ignorant.

edit: ah! just checked your flag. now i have to say - expected
Parent
▼
Mauro 27 Dec 2009, 20:02
feel spoken to, poltard ?
Parent
▼
Dreamweaver 27 Dec 2009, 22:57
fail :)
Parent
▼
Mauro 27 Dec 2009, 23:37
Lol su , a quarter of Poland was built with belgian money in case you didn't know !
Parent
▼
Dreamweaver 28 Dec 2009, 02:09
but what has poland to do with me? :)
Parent
▼
Mauro 28 Dec 2009, 08:51
Real name : Kamil
Country : PL

outside poland , Kamil is rather rare in that form
Parent
▼
Dreamweaver 28 Dec 2009, 13:23
yeah, especially in Arab world. fail again :).
Parent
▼
Mauro 28 Dec 2009, 17:06
Arab ? even better !
Parent
▼
Dreamweaver 28 Dec 2009, 21:52
now i can only say "gtfo infidel" :D
Parent
▼
Mauro 28 Dec 2009, 21:56
Good evening






infidel xD



fucking hilarious , gotta check peanut and jeff dunham aswell
Parent
▼
Dreamweaver 29 Dec 2009, 00:39
spark of insanity was great :)
Parent
▼
mental 26 Dec 2009, 16:55
all the same shit
▼
walle 26 Dec 2009, 17:12
basic

league covering for their fail admins and making hilarious decisions

nothing new there

shit admins are the only reason ET never made it to the top and majority of "best" players left the game ages ago, only stupid wannabes are still left dealing with this shit
▼
mst 26 Dec 2009, 17:15
Why best in "" ?
Parent
▼
walle 26 Dec 2009, 17:17
only 1 can be the best ;)

you can replace it with *good* if it fits better :p
Parent
▼
mst 26 Dec 2009, 17:25
Ye, I fully agree with that anyway ;d.
Parent
▼
fusii 26 Dec 2009, 17:15
you go girl
Parent
▼
DoctorWho 26 Dec 2009, 17:42
did you just call yourself stupid wnb?
Parent
▼
mst 26 Dec 2009, 19:27
Did he just ruined your theory about the 'healthy' scene? :<
Parent
▼
DoctorWho 26 Dec 2009, 20:36
hes just some stupid wnb
Parent
▼
Rhand 26 Dec 2009, 19:31
did you just call me a stupid wnb?
Parent
▼
pupupup 26 Dec 2009, 19:33
stupid wnb rhand, stupid wnb
Parent
▼
Rhand 26 Dec 2009, 19:37
where's the love?
Parent
▼
Dreamweaver 26 Dec 2009, 17:46
"We don't let players/teams decide when to apply our rules, so any arrangement made by teams is always ignored."

This is bullshit. The league is for players, not the other way around.

The basic concept of making global rules is that the league has created the rules that are used only in case two teams cannot come to agreement in some matter. Unfortunately, with time organisations ossify so that the priority becomes 'keeping to the rules' - blind beaurocracy - no matter what you do, as long as you stick to the rules, everything is okay...
▼
Rhand 26 Dec 2009, 19:32
That's the most logical thing in the world. I wonder how the FA would react if both Man U and Chelsea would agree upon playing their game 13v13.
Parent
▼
mst 26 Dec 2009, 19:41
Don't exaggerate it. Did they decide to play 7v7 instead of 6v6? No? Basic rules were kept.
Parent
▼
Rhand 26 Dec 2009, 19:42
Rules are rules, whether they're basic rules or advanced rules.

There are no such things as optional rules.
Parent
▼
mst 26 Dec 2009, 19:49
But the computer game is about the fun (things might change if there are some money prizes) and if both teams AGREE to slighlty modify something then it shouldn't be a problem.
Parent
▼
Rhand 26 Dec 2009, 19:58
In theory, yes, the game is played for fun. But as soon as there's any kind of competition, it requires rules. Transgressed rules should be punished, end of discussion.

If only they contacted a supervisor before the game asking if toxjee could play...
Parent
▼
Deactivated6604 26 Dec 2009, 17:48
What I found most intriguing was the sportsmanship of Power Gaming, you don't see that in Enemy Territory unfortunately :) The other team would take the forfeit win I'm sure.
▼
danL 26 Dec 2009, 17:54
rules are rules, rules don't care if you're #1 or #100000

the blame here lies on the useless ref that admined the match, he should've warned the team to add the player to apl and even more on the leader that didn't add the player to apl
▼
overdrive 26 Dec 2009, 18:15
did you even read the whole thing? Both teams agreed during warmup a merc was going to play. An admin was on the server the whole game, he never mentioned anything about somebody not being on the not allowed lists. Both teams asked to remove the red card AND the forfeit win, even the team that lost.
Parent
▼
danL 26 Dec 2009, 18:17
have you actually read what I wrote?
Parent
▼
Rhand 26 Dec 2009, 19:34
They couldn't add him to the APL anymore as they already added a player during playoff-stage and the ref assumed it wasn't necessary as he belongs to the team already for a few days/weeks as announced on various gamingsites.

The only thing you can blame the ref of was being too lenient.
Parent
▼
danL 26 Dec 2009, 19:36
then he shouldn't play if they added someone in playoffs already OR ask the supervisor, easy as that, is it not?
Parent
▼
Rhand 26 Dec 2009, 19:40
Yes, I absolutely agree. It's their own fault.
Parent
▼
danL 26 Dec 2009, 19:42
no, it's always someone elses fault when it comes to cb
Parent
▼
DoctorWho 26 Dec 2009, 18:07
oh noes the top team wasnt treated in special manner that would allow them to break the rules :0 so different from CB ET...

I guess there are some normal admins @ CB after all, and only ET ones are disabled...


[didnt read the conflict, dont mind me]
▼
Kevin 26 Dec 2009, 18:37
You should read some comments, you made yourself look like an idiot just now :P
Parent
▼
DoctorWho 26 Dec 2009, 20:37
tried to start some flame war... sadly i failed :<
Parent
▼
Pansy 26 Dec 2009, 18:19
had a good giggle about that
▼
risee 26 Dec 2009, 18:37
haha, the funpart is that an admin was actually on the server and speced the match :D
▼
Kevin 26 Dec 2009, 18:38
I bet he was like " harharrrr let's not say anything and fuck them after the game, i'm such a good admin"
Parent
▼
Rhand 26 Dec 2009, 19:34
You should've read the ref's posts instead of talking bs.
Parent
▼
Kevin 26 Dec 2009, 20:05
O MY GOD ITS IMPOSSIBLE FOR ME TO SAY SOMETHING I DONT MEAN

WHAT IS THING THEY CALL SARCASM PLEASE ENLIGHTEN ME
Parent
▼
Rhand 26 Dec 2009, 20:10
You based your sarcastic remark on false assumptions.
Parent
▼
repjeee 26 Dec 2009, 18:40
ESL IS SO FUCKING GREAT:D









jk, my prize money is 1 year late and admins arent answering \:D/
▼
pupupup 26 Dec 2009, 19:33
> implying you have won something in ESL
Parent
▼
essah 26 Dec 2009, 19:15
tl;dr

agree on the topic
▼
Rhand 26 Dec 2009, 19:36
rules are rules, both teams agreeing and ref not saying anything are irrelevant.

what a childish attitude btw: "let's leave CB because they apply their own rules!"
Back to top