you just dont like him because he is scottish.
arrogant? i heard some iviews, he was pretty mature and so on.
i liked federer but once i heard an interview where he stated that
he cant imagine that someone is thinking else than he is the best.
Dont need to look at it Ive watched him since his first wimbledon and even his first queensclub a few weeks before i watch him any time hes on tv never ever heard him be arrogant your talking balls.
i personally would ve loved to see murray taking the victory.
all that federer hype already starts to suck and there aint really much space for new stars, since federer is almost unbeatable in all the important tourneys.
yes he is the best player ever, but it seriously gets boring to know that federer will win even befor the match has started...
the final shouldve been like the one of US open with del potro taking it in a thrilling fight.
those australian open (and i ve watched many of the matches) where pretty boring...
the federer matches where actions of 3 sets and not the slightest chance for his competitors, the ladies tournament was the most boring bullshit ever seen...
seriously the final of the ladies was so boring, 95% of the points didnt have more than 3 hits followed by a fault,
they didnt try to trick each other with great play, they just shot the ball back in the middle and waited for an unforced error...
that aint tennis, thats bullshit
He's (probably) the best tennis player ever so lets say a big part of that hype is justified (for once). Federer is a fantastic athlete and has to work hard in every game + he's a great person!I wonder what you think of all the hype about the CL or WC football.
he definitely is, but for me personally a sports just gets boring if its pretty obvious who will make it before the match has even started...
same was in the hightimes of idle.ee... it was just beautiful to watch them rolling every team that thought it would get close to the top of et, but didnt even see a single chance to win one game against em.
but excitement is something different...
most of the matches even on the long maps, where actions of 5 mins per round if idle attacked and a fullhold if they defended.
for roger federer its nothing unusual if he wins one of the most important grand slams in the world without even giving a way a single set...
It's good to see such a good player playing quality tennis. Yes, it's getting predictable but it won't go on forever, everyone knows that. By the way just look how awful woman tennis was without Henin & Clijsters. Do you want to see that? I rather see better players like Federer playing quality tennis and winning most of it (it's not like he wins EVERY grand slam) than watching rubbish, boring tennis. If Federer would retire tennis wouldn't be as interesting anymore (yes maybe unpredictable but that's it)
thats true, although the best matches to watch are not the federer matches, but the ones with 2 evenskilled guys...
last year @ us open del potro made it to the level of federer and the final was sensational...
this year the distance to the second best player became pretty huge again.
btw... now that clijsters & henin were back, woman tennis didnt change :d
certainly they are really good but as i mentioned, the woman final was the most boring crap ever seen
Highlevel Tennis became boring due to the Federerdomination.
I rather go to the local courts and watch our 2nd german league Team play, its much more fun.
Tosspot just being a retard cause murray is scottish and hes better than any english player has ever been. I bet any money if he was ENGLISH TOSSPOT AND THE REST OF ENGLAND would be classing him as one of the best players in the world but they just cant take the fact that hes scottish and a great player and all the english players they have are shitter than shit.
TOO BAD TOSSPOT YOUR ENGLISH PLAYERS ARE JUST TO SHIT GET OVER IT.
+1. The banter between england and scotland is always funny, to be fair im not the extremist that wants all scottish players or teams to lose every game. Think a lot of ppl go over the top by full on taking the piss out of eachother's teams and players. I hope murray does well even though hes scottish...
I think it's more that people go over the top with taking it personally. As you know, not all of us Scots are like that! This guy's a Celtic fan, it's not been a great past couple of years for him.
ahahahaha. Cant wait to see his next reply. My family are all from up north - newcastle so its nearly scotland ! Whenever i have been up there its always been a great crack and a great night out. Even when they know ur english, there is just friendly banter and u can have a nice drinking session. Unfortunately on both sides u have got the odd few plonkers !
ahah fucker dont matter we will still win the league we got the better team just cant score for shit at the moment and they hairy faced huns seem to score with there only chances in a game.
Federer outclassed him in the 1st 2 sets, Murray should have took his chances to win the 3rd. He used to be very arrogant and there is a part of me that wont forgive him for wearing that paraguay shirt when england played paraguay in the world cup. However, hes matured a lot and i have grown to like him. He will win a grand slam, unfortunately i think that was his best chance for the year. Next year i think he will win the US.
ok i know u aren't the smartest guy around so i will try to make it click for u. This year - this tour - the US open - Murray will not win. Next year - next tour - 2011 - Murray will win.
what you talking about hes scottish you muppet as if he wants england to win in football think your heads up your arse. You just think that everyone should support england in everything they do that just shows how ARROGANT you english really are. Yous are 2 faced arseholes cause any time scotland plays you all want us to lose and then laugh when we do but when its the other way around yous cry and cry . Most arrogant country in the world yous are
Its not the point about each country wanting each other to lose, tbh its natural and i cant blame him for it. The fact that he came out in front of the cameras with a paraguay shirt on makes it a whole different story. I mean, 70% of his fans are english - so he should show a little bit of respect. Its like David Beckham wearing a french shirt to a press conference. I think u need to get off ur high horse urself, i dont have anything against scotland but u playing the victim card is hillarious.
How the hell can 70% of his fans be english when even the commentators where saying any brit aka english they asked said they would rather that federer win so wheres the support when most of england dont like murray at all but every scot was behind murray and did you notice there wasnt any british flags only scottish flags at the australia crowd in every round until the final then there was only about 2 british flags and they where carried by scots wearing scotland tops and saltires on there faces and 1 guy wearing union jack on his face.
believe what u want, ofc the whole of scotland is behind him but id still say the majority of his fans live in england - due to the population difference? Keep playing the victim card though, i guess the whole world hates u.
what victim card your just to arrogant that you think all his support is english when its a fact most dont even like murray cause hes scottish. Yous are just annoyed that all english players are shit look at what yous done with tim henman the guy was shit at tennis yet yous talked him up like he was the best player in the world always saying hes gonna win a major when he had no chance in hell, and now murray who is 100 times better than henman comes along and suddenly hes not good enough wonder why that is oh wait its because hes scottish.
i know you dont wana go there. No disrespect to scotland but ur making urself and ur country look shocking. Ur comparing the 2 countries over 1 sport - tennis. Yes no doubt murray is probably the best male british player there has been, especially when he hits his prime in a year or so. The fact that ur talking so much patter is unbelievable. Should we compare football, rugby, F1, snooker, darts, dominos. This is no disrespect for scotland but if ur gonna slate England in 1 sport, i think u need to compare the others. The fact is u take the banter too far. The reason i said most of his support is english is because of the popularity difference. Scotland would ofc have a higher percentage of support per person no doubt... Playing the victim card is saying that we are arrogant, dont want u to be good etc etc. Ur doing the exact same thing ur saying the english are doing...
Exactly we do it aswell its the fact that when we do it back yous cry about it . And the clear fact that if murray was english yous would be going mental saying hes fucking brilliant this and that and even though england is better than scotland in a good few sports they are still not good compared to most of the other top teams and lose in most of those sports you mentioned constantly and lold at dominos ya wido. But as you said england has a big population difference so its easier for them to get good players a fact i think yous all forget.
I think murray is and will be the best male player from the uk ever. U happy ? I dont mind stating it, its just funny the way u go on about it. Couldnt care if he was irish or welsh. Hes a great player...
well you must be the exception in england then congrats, and its funny to me the way england went on about tim henman even though he wasnt good . It jsut sounds a bit gayish to me that they slag murray even though he is way better than henman who they praised but both were playing for "britain" only diffrence is ones english ones scottish.
i never liked tim henman. I cheered for him because he was from gb, but he was a boring no emotion shit player that had no bottle. Also i dont think many ppl slag murray off because he has no talent, its just his attitude from the past.
where was all tim henmans finals? and i think today is the most competitive era of tennis even though federer rules all the players below him are all still good but henman wasnt a skilfull tennis player he was a serve and vollyer didnt have anything else thats why he didnt win anything.
aye he does but federer would rule all in any era of tennis with the way hes played last few years but the players below him are all still competitive for top 5 in the world and everyone can beat each other on diffrent days.
Even the commentators where saying every brit they asked says they would rather federer win and by brit he must have been meaning english cause every scot was supporting murray so dosent sound like he had lots of support.
Murray is good enough to win a title but Federer just played awesomely for the first two sets. Even with Murray playing very well he was just winning all the big points.
I don't think any player I've seen would have beaten Federer on that form.
He wanted to make a point that he's the best and that he did
Well oke, he was on top in 2000-2004.
But that still doesnt change anything in the point im making. You're trying to compare players that had their best moment in different times.
Such an atempt obviously fails.
i was a bit wrong about about the years safin was on top. but still they havent been on top at the same time. they couldnt meet when both had their best years (like eg. federer-nadal).
im just laughing about u trying to compare them, saying safin would beat federer if he wanted to^^ thats simply wrong
you remember semi-final safin vs feder at australian open?! i think that was their best tennis they ever played ( exept nadal-federer at wimbledon) and btw safin is the only player who's talented as federer
"that was their best tennis they ever played" - i wouldnt agree about federer.
[ 2004 - early2005 ] - safin was ending his top times, while for federer it was only a preludium to his best times: [ Wimbledon '06 - USOpen '07 ]. thats the time when he dominated totally, by being present in 10 consecutive grand slam finals.
in other words, federer was rising when safin was fading. they met each other few times (in previous australian open federer beat safin in final), but if i was to point out best moments of both players, id say 2000 for safin when he beat sampras and 2006/07 for federer. 6 years difference.
But yeah, he's arrogant.
You're a bad man! :D
edit: He's better than that English twat Henman was.
But Federer is an awesome player :O
tennis is gay.
thats like losing 0-10 in football in 85 minute
thats what you have done in the first place...
arrogant? i heard some iviews, he was pretty mature and so on.
i liked federer but once i heard an interview where he stated that
he cant imagine that someone is thinking else than he is the best.
murray.. bill murray
all that federer hype already starts to suck and there aint really much space for new stars, since federer is almost unbeatable in all the important tourneys.
yes he is the best player ever, but it seriously gets boring to know that federer will win even befor the match has started...
the final shouldve been like the one of US open with del potro taking it in a thrilling fight.
those australian open (and i ve watched many of the matches) where pretty boring...
the federer matches where actions of 3 sets and not the slightest chance for his competitors, the ladies tournament was the most boring bullshit ever seen...
seriously the final of the ladies was so boring, 95% of the points didnt have more than 3 hits followed by a fault,
they didnt try to trick each other with great play, they just shot the ball back in the middle and waited for an unforced error...
that aint tennis, thats bullshit
same was in the hightimes of idle.ee... it was just beautiful to watch them rolling every team that thought it would get close to the top of et, but didnt even see a single chance to win one game against em.
but excitement is something different...
most of the matches even on the long maps, where actions of 5 mins per round if idle attacked and a fullhold if they defended.
for roger federer its nothing unusual if he wins one of the most important grand slams in the world without even giving a way a single set...
last year @ us open del potro made it to the level of federer and the final was sensational...
this year the distance to the second best player became pretty huge again.
btw... now that clijsters & henin were back, woman tennis didnt change :d
certainly they are really good but as i mentioned, the woman final was the most boring crap ever seen
I rather go to the local courts and watch our 2nd german league Team play, its much more fun.
TOO BAD TOSSPOT YOUR ENGLISH PLAYERS ARE JUST TO SHIT GET OVER IT.
SCOTLAND#1 YA PRICK.
: )
This was Australian open
This is exactly what you're doing right now.
I don't think any player I've seen would have beaten Federer on that form.
He wanted to make a point that he's the best and that he did
But that still doesnt change anything in the point im making. You're trying to compare players that had their best moment in different times.
Such an atempt obviously fails.
Australian Open Winner 2005 -Marat Safin
sry dude but...
he didnt win anything after the australian open which was in january 2005, so you can basically say he was on top untill 2004.
sorry dude but...
and still, thats just sad how you try to avoid the main point :)
im just laughing about u trying to compare them, saying safin would beat federer if he wanted to^^ thats simply wrong
[ 2004 - early2005 ] - safin was ending his top times, while for federer it was only a preludium to his best times: [ Wimbledon '06 - USOpen '07 ]. thats the time when he dominated totally, by being present in 10 consecutive grand slam finals.
in other words, federer was rising when safin was fading. they met each other few times (in previous australian open federer beat safin in final), but if i was to point out best moments of both players, id say 2000 for safin when he beat sampras and 2006/07 for federer. 6 years difference.
Tennis is played as the full nation! GB
Mine was in good taste, ofc!