Key Points
In summary, and leaving aside the question of Iceland´s legal obligation in this
matter, this is what Iceland proposes:
-Iceland will ensure that the full amount expended by the United Kingdom and the
Netherlands to pay Icesave depositors in each of those countries (up to the EUR
20,887 minimum provided for in accordance with the EU Deposit Guarantee Scheme) is
recovered by the Governments of those two countries.
-Iceland will, in addition, reimburse the United Kingdom and the Netherlands for
the reasonable time value of the funds expended for this purpose until recovered
by those Governments.
We think it unwise, however, to encourage the perception that this arrangement
would, in effect, return a profit to the Governments of the United Kingdom and the
Netherlands for the monies expended to repay depositors in those countries at the
expense of the Icelandic taxpayer. The last communication from the British and
Dutch negotiators proposed that Iceland pay a margin (in effect, a profit element)
of 2.75 percentage points above the cost of the funds expended for this purpose
for the last four years of the six-year loan.
To set this in context, the current cost of funds for pounds sterling (for a six
month LIBOR deposit) is approximately 0.9% per annum. The proposal put forward by
the British and Dutch negotiators on February 19, 2010 -- purportedly as their
"final and best" offer -- sought a margin of 2.75% on top of the cost of funds
rate. In other words, that proposal sought to recover a profit component of more
than three times the current base rate.
Taking into account the concession of a two-year interest holiday in years 2009
and 2010 (which we estimate will represent approximately ISK 20 billion cost to
the United Kingdom and the Netherlands (based on prevailing LIBOR/Eurobor rates)),
just the 2.75% margin element until the loan is fully repaid in accordance with
your proposal would, we estimate, add ISK 110 billion to the total bill. The net
profit to the United Kingdom and the Netherlands under that proposal is therefore
approximately ISK 90 billion.
And to set these figures in context, the additional return to the taxpayers of the
United Kingdom and the Netherlands equates to a further contribution of
approximately ISK 280,000 from each citizen of Iceland (equivalent to
approximately EUR 1,600).
In the resolution of this regrettable affair, we believe that all three
Governments should be seen as acting with restraint and balance.
**********
* Structure: TIF Loan Agreement
Bullet maturity -- June 5, 2016
* Outstanding balance of loan to accrue interest, commencing January 1, 2012,
at the following per annum rates:
2012 2.50%
2013 2.75%
2014 3.00%
2015 3.25%
2016 (until June 5) 3.50%
* On June 5, 2016, the entire outstanding balance of the loan (remaining
principal plus accrued interest) will become the "Shortfall" covered by the
Shortfall Indemnity Agreement (in the form previously supplied).
________________________________
Iceland would be prepared to prepay in cash the full anticipated amount of
interest, discounted at an appropriate rate.
As the overwhelming majority of Icelanders reject a bill that would saddle each citizen with almost €50K of debt, heres a look at the countrys thirst for new business models.
these vulcano ashes makes it piss cold here, covering the sun =[
In summary, and leaving aside the question of Iceland´s legal obligation in this
matter, this is what Iceland proposes:
-Iceland will ensure that the full amount expended by the United Kingdom and the
Netherlands to pay Icesave depositors in each of those countries (up to the EUR
20,887 minimum provided for in accordance with the EU Deposit Guarantee Scheme) is
recovered by the Governments of those two countries.
-Iceland will, in addition, reimburse the United Kingdom and the Netherlands for
the reasonable time value of the funds expended for this purpose until recovered
by those Governments.
We think it unwise, however, to encourage the perception that this arrangement
would, in effect, return a profit to the Governments of the United Kingdom and the
Netherlands for the monies expended to repay depositors in those countries at the
expense of the Icelandic taxpayer. The last communication from the British and
Dutch negotiators proposed that Iceland pay a margin (in effect, a profit element)
of 2.75 percentage points above the cost of the funds expended for this purpose
for the last four years of the six-year loan.
To set this in context, the current cost of funds for pounds sterling (for a six
month LIBOR deposit) is approximately 0.9% per annum. The proposal put forward by
the British and Dutch negotiators on February 19, 2010 -- purportedly as their
"final and best" offer -- sought a margin of 2.75% on top of the cost of funds
rate. In other words, that proposal sought to recover a profit component of more
than three times the current base rate.
Taking into account the concession of a two-year interest holiday in years 2009
and 2010 (which we estimate will represent approximately ISK 20 billion cost to
the United Kingdom and the Netherlands (based on prevailing LIBOR/Eurobor rates)),
just the 2.75% margin element until the loan is fully repaid in accordance with
your proposal would, we estimate, add ISK 110 billion to the total bill. The net
profit to the United Kingdom and the Netherlands under that proposal is therefore
approximately ISK 90 billion.
And to set these figures in context, the additional return to the taxpayers of the
United Kingdom and the Netherlands equates to a further contribution of
approximately ISK 280,000 from each citizen of Iceland (equivalent to
approximately EUR 1,600).
In the resolution of this regrettable affair, we believe that all three
Governments should be seen as acting with restraint and balance.
**********
* Structure: TIF Loan Agreement
Bullet maturity -- June 5, 2016
* Outstanding balance of loan to accrue interest, commencing January 1, 2012,
at the following per annum rates:
2012 2.50%
2013 2.75%
2014 3.00%
2015 3.25%
2016 (until June 5) 3.50%
* On June 5, 2016, the entire outstanding balance of the loan (remaining
principal plus accrued interest) will become the "Shortfall" covered by the
Shortfall Indemnity Agreement (in the form previously supplied).
________________________________
Iceland would be prepared to prepay in cash the full anticipated amount of
interest, discounted at an appropriate rate.
cocksuckers!
rolled by iceland? no
vulcano ownd iceland? yes
ashes ownd europe? yes
blame iceland or vulcano? iceland
nuke them or let them be? nuke once, then nuke twice
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHg5SJYRHA0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wd63P7mYXzo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uCx_wPbUJhE
http://www.pressan.is/ImageHandler.ashx?ID=a7bef38b-87e5-4ca6-a1c4-189b6fba45a2&type=originals