Anderson on Intel's GameOn - Blaming the developers

Of course it was written by me, http://thesaurus.com and our proofreader Moyes do miracles

stop attentionwhoring o/ :DD <3

+1

"People are tweaking it afterwards anyway (...)"

Competitive gamers do that, casuals usually not. Casuals are like 90 percent of all gamers, so we as comp. gamers dont matter to any developer (in most cases).

i agree that grafics arent that important, but only people who wants to play a game competetively - because it has a nice and entertaining multiplayer, will fight for every fps they can get with tweaking gfx and so on. they wont buy a new pc worth 1000€+ just to play the games on decent quality.

for the rest and its a fact that the majority of gamers, play a new game just to get overwhelmed by new grafics to say "Oh Ma God! This Looks Fucking Insane Real!" Exactly those people wont care to much about tweaking options, except in one direction: high, higher, highest! on the other hand companies want to make money and they earn more money with selling good-up-to-date-looking games, and not with addvertising a decent multiplayer. since those people wont give a care if the mp is good or not. they will play 20h of singleplayer and uninstall the game afterwards - but they spend the 40/50€ for it.

thanks for killing ETQW

Intel's GameOn website

+1 :)

:p

Is that you meez?

it was a massive pain to log in to crossfire on this internet connection but your bitterness provided incentive

considering everything covered in this article was common knowledge atleast 5 years ago i have absolutely zero interest in discussing it

suck a dick

Monthly subscription is the way to go for fps on pc! In the end, if developers deliver a good game, it works out better for them. I guess developers are just to scared to take the risk... QL was a step in the right direction, although it was a low risk project since the game was already there ofc. I just hope ql becomes profitable so we can see some necessary chance.