BF3 Beta [update]
•
1 Oct 2011, 18:45
•
News
On the 29th September the Battlefield 3 Open Beta went live, giving you the chance to play before the games release on the 28th October. If you're new to the Battlefield series then it can be summarised as another modern First Person Shooter which features plenty of vehicular game-play. It's cutting edge graphics and physics are provided by the brand new Frostbite 2 engine - but don't expect to run this game on your machine that can barely churn out 125fps in Enemy Territory. The developers revealed that two top of the range graphic cards in SLI will just about be enough to make the most of the engines potential, and for anyone else who wishes to see Battlefield at its best then an upgrade will be in order.
Access to the Beta is straightforward. First you'll need to set up an EA Origin account which can be done here, then download the Origin client. (Origin is a new online store, similar to Steam, which has been surrounded in heavy controversy since announcing it's Terms & Conditions - which I give my full opinion on here.) Once that's complete you can proceed to download the game from the Free Games section of the Origin's store. If your PC is struggling to run the game then both nVidia and ATI have released updated graphics drivers specifically designed to increase performance in Battlefield 3 and the links to those can be found below.
Levin has posted a forum topic to localise the Battlefield 3 Beta players from Crossfire. There you'll find an existing player list and a link to the 'Crossfire Platoon'.
Battlefield 3 Beta Impressions
The beta is OK thus far, but Rush on Operation Metro was a pretty poor choice by the developers in my opinion. The Rush gameplay mechanics and the layout of the map invite heavy camping by the defenders. It would've been more interesting if we could play Conquest on the same map.
OS: Windows Vista (Service Pack 2) 32-Bit
Processor: 2 GHz Dual Core (Core 2 Duo 2.4 GHZ or Althon X2 2.7 GHz)
Memory: 2 GB
Hard Drive: 20 GB
Graphics Card (AMD): DirectX 10.1 compatible with 512 MB RAM (ATI RADEON 3000, 4000, 5000 OR 6000 series, with ATI RADEON 3870 or higher performance)
Graphics Card (NVIDIA): DirectX 10.0 compatible with 512 MB RAM (NVIDIA GEFORCE 8, 9, 200, 300, 400 OR 500 series with NVIDIA GEFORCE 8800 GT or higher performance)
Sound card : DirectX compatible
Keyboard and Mouse
DVD ROM Drive
recommended:
OS: Windows 7 64-Bit
Processor: Quad-Core CPU
Memory: 4 GB
Hard Drive: 20 GB
Graphics Card: DirectX 11 compatible with 1024 MB RAM (NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX 560 or ATI RADEON 6950)
Sound Card: DirectX compatible
Keyboard and Mouse
DVD ROM Drive
6o6>5o5
owned
typical beta bugs LOl
bf 3 > *
also if the round ends while you are typing in chat the keyboard is completely dead on next map, all sorts of things like that.
as you said typical beta bugs
ET FOREVER
so funny to read comments from all the retards saying its a fail
tho i dont like origin and battlelog at all
also 32v32 is back so i dont really see this game being "smaller scal" than bf2. quite the opposite i may add cause bf2 maps were smaller than caspian border.
i think they have very carefully decided how to develop their game in the future. they took many that worked great in bc2 and made it so popular, they reintroduced stuff (prone but with a nice pause of fire when changing stance to prevent bf2's dolphin diving, mobile spawnpoint like 2142). they made the game be a lot more aim centered, remade and rebalanced the classes (4 class system is a lot better than the million classes from bf2 cause you were so freaking limited in what you were able to do).
i have played every single BF game and I think they imrpoved the game each time.
all the noobs that are whining about it not being bf2 should play bf2 or bf play4free (which is a remake). Also when compared to the changes from bf2->2142 and 2142->bc2 they have gone somewhat oldschool again which is quite a big deal cause bc2 was hugely successful.
i absolutely love it and played to lvl42 out of 45 in 16,5 hours.
I _only_ play PDW for that exact reason: they are beasty, even on range.
That however makes the game feel fast paced and thats exactly what I want. I want to be able to outrun bipod MGs, I want to see the glint from scopes and I want the short weapons to be the best. Cba with all the campy shit games that have been released in recent years, this feels awesome.
the balance is there i think (note the absence of flashbangs cause close quarter combat is already on my/the rushers side)
even 2142 was better imo. improving a game is good, keeping it simple and doing nothing with it is boring. but hey what can one expect from a community playing a game which is as old as the average age of its players.
brb
really
(By DRM I mean the whole fucking process of first having to run the game through Origin, after which you will be taken to the Battlelog site [also fgsfds, having to run a game as heavy on your computer as this while having a fucking browser open], through which you'll finally get to launch the game if you're fortunate enough not to have some shitty error messages.)
where
cover for the win
(Not trying to glorify them in any way, seeing as they're fucking us up with the whole Origin/Battlelog bullshit, but credit where credit is due, you don't see developers building anything on PC these days.)