Call Of Duty

Limit the SMG's?

by swine • 20 Mar 2008, 20:59 • Polls
i33 will limit the SMG's to 2 per team and the upcoming CoDQCup had 3 first, but thinking about limit them to 2 per team aswell. What do you think?
15.7 %
(119 votes)
19.1 %
(145 votes)
65.2 %
(494 votes)
Comments
62
▼
Deactivated6284 20 Mar 2008, 21:01
3 per team i dunt mind
▼
adze 21 Mar 2008, 01:09
Come back to et loverboy! <3
Parent
▼
Decade 20 Mar 2008, 21:02
This would be a brilliant rule for enemy territory! Imagine having only 2 smgs and the rest are forced to be panzer, mg and rifles! :D

so I voted don't care
▼
huumeantti 20 Mar 2008, 21:03
ye, hf playing 3on3 with 2 smgs
Parent
▼
Deactivated7001 20 Mar 2008, 21:23
I was already afraid about that, when I read the poll.
Parent
▼
chelmianin 20 Mar 2008, 21:43
me too, I would 'limit' soldier and rifle to 0, but not smg...
Parent
▼
Yossarian 20 Mar 2008, 21:07
finally...
▼
Alvo 20 Mar 2008, 21:12
3 or more
▼
mnk 20 Mar 2008, 21:13
y is the smg over powered or somthing?
▼
swine 20 Mar 2008, 21:17
you run faster, less spread, same dmg as assault rifles...so yes, it's pretty much imba
Parent
▼
Deactivated6284 20 Mar 2008, 21:24
but shit at aiming from a distance
Parent
▼
mnk 20 Mar 2008, 21:35
i see thanks for infozz
Parent
▼
h8m3 20 Mar 2008, 21:14
#care per team
▼
yousmell 20 Mar 2008, 21:20
2 of "care" per team would be ok aswell
Parent
▼
Deactivated3024 20 Mar 2008, 21:36
2 is just lol.
If it's going to be limited then as much as possible, but in my opinion you shouldn't limit them at all, since the newest nogunswaymod is fixing the AK, too, so you can actually hit properly on distance. (smg has no chance then)
▼
loctarar 20 Mar 2008, 22:01
How large is a CoD team?
▼
hvK 20 Mar 2008, 22:05
If it's CoD4... Couldn't give a damn
▼
im a tree 20 Mar 2008, 22:06
I voted 2, because it is the worst option, and thus by voting 2 I'm ruining a game I don't even play. MUHAHA.
▼
swine 20 Mar 2008, 22:20
Poll: CoD
▼
pumu 20 Mar 2008, 22:42
could someone tell me how they play
1 sniper + 1 pumpgun ??

what counts as SMG btw?? soldier + specOps ??
▼
swine 20 Mar 2008, 22:55
at the moment it's looking like 1 sniper, 1 assault rifle, 3 specops with smg's.
Parent
▼
pumu 20 Mar 2008, 22:57
ah thx
i think 2 then
m4a1 is more skill anyways ?! i liked it!
Parent
▼
swine 20 Mar 2008, 22:59
of course m4a1 is smarter, but infight against an smg on short distance you are fucked
Parent
▼
MerlinatoR 21 Mar 2008, 06:11
so if it was limited to 2, these 2 would be demigods taking down whole teams? :-(
Parent
▼
lagg3r 20 Mar 2008, 23:05
An error has occured:
» You have already voted on this poll.
▼
spooz 20 Mar 2008, 23:20
lal , first i really thought it is about ET :D
▼
Arachon 20 Mar 2008, 23:29
3 SMG's is fine.
▼
juxx 20 Mar 2008, 23:44
3 imo, the main problem according to me were 5man SMG rushes on some maps, that's completely out the picture so I don't see the point in limiting further.
▼
Arcade 21 Mar 2008, 00:06
I voted 2, because limiting it to 3 isn't really making a difference as with a 5man team, 1 will be a sniper and then just as many really will still be able to be smg making no difference...either make it 2 or get rid of the AK74u thats the only reason people are limiting it really...mp5 is half as effective..
▼
evan 21 Mar 2008, 00:17
SK will suck now if they get rid of SMG!
▼
Longbow 21 Mar 2008, 01:19
3 per team is already widely accepted, and the best imo
▼
dohfOs 21 Mar 2008, 01:25
agreed. 3 is the best to keep the speed in the game which among other things has made cod4 such a giant hit were cod1&2 failed.

and this poll is just poorly formulated. quite obvious that the one who made it wants 2 and not 3 ;)
Parent
▼
Sainted 21 Mar 2008, 10:58
plz cod4 sucks compared to cod2
Parent
▼
juxx 21 Mar 2008, 17:28
it's good to see the opinion of someone that has put many hours in the games he talks about (I wonder why I still reply to you, but I guess it's because you're a man a mission to save ETQW and do so by humping COD4 at every single occasion you get)

ps: GL with the ETQW needs more NL players-post on gamelux
Parent
▼
Sainted 21 Mar 2008, 17:45
Played CoD2 hundreds of hours - needed two hours to realize cod4 wasn't the game for me.

ps. Having much fun waiting for CoD4TV?
ps2. Its rather sad of you to even care about my opinions about a game when they are not even related to something I post here. As you can see dofhOs himself started the CoD2 vs CoD4 discussion, I just gave my opinion.
ps3. Do you allow me to use multiple post scriptum's because it looks like you mind things I do which are not related to the topic at all
Parent
▼
shmoe 21 Mar 2008, 02:39
tis is et community so sais the poll! leave me alone!
▼
Winghaven 21 Mar 2008, 05:06
2, and cya fnatic, sk, tlr :DDD
▼
swine 21 Mar 2008, 10:28
-fnatic i mean
Parent
▼
Baz 21 Mar 2008, 06:31
Call of Duty 4 // Streaming servers = 1,704

Call of Duty 4 // Bans to date = 4,074

Impresive for a relativley new game :)
▼
mrozu 21 Mar 2008, 10:49
impressive stats!
Parent
▼
Deactivated6284 21 Mar 2008, 18:44
Well atleast PB is doing its job ;)
Parent
▼
wAndAA 21 Mar 2008, 08:36
2 per team... smgs are a part of the game already, and can't be nerfed too much... but 2 would make the game a bit slower paced, which would be fine
▼
shpeKje 21 Mar 2008, 09:01
rofl, i thought this poll is about et
▼
dEzIrE 21 Mar 2008, 09:53
shotgunnnnnnnnnn XDDDD
▼
hvK 21 Mar 2008, 10:00
Jaymod please.
Parent
▼
dEzIrE 21 Mar 2008, 10:00
& Double Jump!
Parent
▼
joey 21 Mar 2008, 11:31
dont really care, sorry :<
▼
Echo 21 Mar 2008, 11:32
1 would be great aswell, hate those things
▼
ratte` 21 Mar 2008, 11:59
this is a retarded poll, you cant even choose for NO CHOOSE WHAT YOU LIKE TO USE


or someting like that.
▼
HugTheSub 21 Mar 2008, 15:41
CoD, whats that ?
▼
Skinner 21 Mar 2008, 16:26
YAY lets turn cod into AK47 vs AK47 game...
Back to top