Do you agree with collectivly punishing the team of a cheater?

Do you believe a tournament admins discretion is sufficient to decide if players've knowingly played with a cheater and to ban them from future competitions on a case by case basis - or should everyone associated with be shown the door?

Or do you believe collective punishment is just plain wrong?
58.4 %
(471 votes)
41.6 %
(335 votes)
Comments
137
Only with cases as obvious as gnajda.
But where do you draw the line? It's human instinct to give your friend the benefit of the doubt - 'n it be your job to apply the rules fairly to everyone.

Would this not stop clans taking on anyone remotely good that haven't at least appeared at a LAN?

(speaking generally, don't know 'bout gnajda)
Parent
It's something that comes down to a case by case basis, and i'd argue that if the informed majority agree, then the informed majority will most likely be right. I agree there's issues with drawing the line, and subjectivity etc., but when it's a community of 1000 against a team of 6, exceptions may be considered.

I disagree with the LAN issues, there's many reasons why one may not go to LAN.
Parent
Sure there be plenty excuses reasons. But wi the amount of players that've played at a high level 'n then been caught cheating later on - why would we risk playing X in competition when we've never seen them LAN? They seem a good player, but I don't wanna be banned too, so just incase...

mm a players caught cheating in NC. Does every player of that NC team, and every player of their teams get banned too?:p
Parent
hello bell end. i would agree with nellie aswell, alot of high skill players would come back to et, if it wasnt full of hackers. though i agree a judgement may need to be made on a case by case basis, anyone accuse of hacking on a regular basis normally is hacking, with a few rare exceptions such as maus, but do you really belive there are so many good polish players, keep in mind that in the early eurocups etc there was only 1 or 2 decent polish teams (FF and Net Runners.) and now you cant get a war without playing some awesome aim pawners with no game sense from poland.
Parent
actually, argument about growing skill of polish players can be explained by decreasing price of proper connection, which we didn't have for a long time
Parent
i would agree with that, but as you well know, thats not the reason, though i would say it has increased the number of gamers, and i guess the chance of comming across good players. but the last 3 years the amount of hackers ive come accross alot have been from poland.
Parent
ooh and im assuming your using the term "proper connection" losely.
Parent
haha, I mean something you can run game on :P
Parent
lol fair enough, how are you anyways you wm tear away.
Parent
I don't think this 'idea' would work as well. Check rise' comment for an example.

Banning all people who knowingly play/ed with (ex)cheaters and there'd be no community left.
Banning people who knowingly play/ed with cheaters in the competitive scene (e.g. kenta, junky, gnajda and retards like malck\ijijabs <- whatever his fucking name is) would be a better option and would more often than not be put down to individual cases.

If you banned people who have knowingly played with people who cheated @ public a while back nobody would be around, especially the UK scene :D

</rambleramble>
Parent
life isn't black and white dudddddddddddde
Parent
Depends, if the team is aware of the cheater(s).
It be a broader question - how does one decide if? Obviously there be the extreme, yer hyperbole - but everyone else?
Parent
yes
Quoteif players've knowingly played with a cheater
You've changed the meaning of my sentence :)

"Do you beliee a tournament admins discretion is sufficient to decide if players've knowingly played"
Parent
only if sol is admin
Parent
we cant just make such an attitude to all polish players, because it would be easier to ban whole Team Poland instead of FF
In the past I thought it was harsh, but now that cheating is so rife it's something that just has to be done. It's different if you don't know that the person is cheating, or if they're an ex-cheater, that's forgivable - but playing with someone who is very likely to be cheating is just asking for trouble.
man, ok, they were banned from EC, gnajda is banned for 12 months. they served their punishment. they aren't playing with him anymore (i think they arent playing anything lol) it's like punishing somebody twice for the same crime
Parent
this poll is not only about gnajda. gnajda is only an example
Parent
Sure, I do.
no, cuz the team isn't often aware of this. Except if the guy is obvious like gnajda or switch.
yesh, happened to me
happened to me too. in UKEG we had won warleagues that year, and when we found out PRIME (some dutch guy i recruited *blush* ) was cheating, we owned up and told the admins, they took the points off us for the games he played in, and we lost the league cos of it. but its better to have a set of balls and own up if you find a hacker in your team.
I agree - but now UKEG could've been banned for the next season too...
Parent
And that would be pointless and unfair because they voluntarily informed the admins. That's why my vote is NO.
Parent
plus without wall hack we were shit. :PPPP dont forget about the all important et nation cup dude
Parent
seeing templar not allowed to play is a good thing. voted yes
Yes, as long as those admins are somewhat competent and experienced and their decision can be backed up by some sort of evidence, either conclusive or circumstantial, if it's strong enough.

Of course the border between competent and incompetent is very blurry, but common sense should be enough to decide who's oK for the job.
I like your Engrish mr. Diversus!
Parent
yes, of course.
yes definetly, if it is rather obvious that the guy cheated in competition - to distinguish him from ppl like perfo and/or other dutchies for example - and if his his team knowingly played with him.
though i agree with kot that those admins should be "somewhat competent and experienced"... for example i wouldn't trust killerboy in such a situation (nothing personal against him but you can't ban desire for being weird) but rather someone like sol.
in my opinion everyone knowingly playing with kenta, junky, nirv, koto, trix, boumbo, sinner, nackscott or whatever they are called deserves a ban.
talking of perfo... he knowingly played with qyz aka busted cheater who returned with a nick n30, played at EC with his cheats, attended cpc2 etc. ALL THIS, without perfo saying a word who he is. I believe that was quite awesome thing to do from perfo, I love you perfo, you're the best, I bet you never used cheats either when you have such a nice attitude.
Parent
No, that's just lame.
yes, but more like in forfeit losses for the matches where the cheater played
aren't you the guy that got busted and still remained 'God' on xfire?

voted no for delicious irony
nope thats not him
Parent
I'm sure there was some drama around that when he got busted as "nll", I'm trying to find it but xfire's shitty search engine doesn't let me
Parent
ah lol i thought u meant fusen :P
Parent
okay then, still trying to find the forum thread though :p
Parent
I remember some cvar in his config or something, cant remember more than that about it though.
Parent
It was Tosspot!
Parent
racist, pathetic, ignorant.
what a race polish ppl are, what makes u so different race, iknow negroids have different skin color and curly hair etc and mongols have yellowish skin tone and wierd eyes but what makes u so "special"?
Parent
your not a race, but i agree on the other parts
Parent
only in the most obvious cases....
That means you cant play then, you've knowingly played with (ex)cheaters!!!
hmm, dunno why I voted yes, but tbh I would just let Wrobel be the captain and keep an eye on him :P In the EC case CB admins should've also done something way earlier, so just don't give him the chance to let him do it again :P
i think we need a new definition of cheater in that case
u mean "cheating like gnaida" definition? : )
Parent
voted no, cuz its a fine line. I can understand ppl being pissed at wrobel for playing with gnajda and not rly responding to any accusations. But its still possible he just thought the guy was clean and he trusted him.
Yes, because if teams don't risk any punishment you can just recruit a team full of cheaters and then pick up new ones as your players get busted.

It's up to the teams to make sure the people they play with are legit. If there're people in your team you feel you can't trust maybe it's not such a swell idea to let them in. I think teams are getting off easily, there's almost no accountability in this scene. A team is free to recruit whoever and whatever they want and just get away with it because they say "we didn't know".
Teams just pick up random players from the street and says it's not their fault when it turns out they're a lying, cheating punk. Well, I think to a great extent it is. When an ET team recruits a new player they're so lazy. They put up a thread on some forum or spam on IRC, someone PMs them, they make a trial and then the deal is done.
How about doing some research on your new player? Check with his old clanleaders, old teammates? There's not a single step being taken to ensure their new player ISN'T a cheater.

I'm also getting tired of people blaming the leagues when they punish teams for having a cheating player. It's the player's fault for cheating, not the league's.
its not like you have 100000 choices nowadays!!!

afaik its hard to find a clan and its harder to find a decent player for an existant team!!
Parent
OW YEAH PUNISH ME !!!!

MORE MORE


YEAH YEAH
no team is totally responsible of its players. But as it comes to better clans on a higher level i guess the captains have to check the history and the gameplay, if this doesnt match each other you have to watch out
i fucking love this site
Since the game is dead the few players still willing to play should be allowed to play this cup.
If the cheater gets caught while playing for the team, yes, if the team ejects the cheater before he is caught by the community, no.
Depends. If the team keeps protecting him after watch good profs, yes definitely. Can remember 2 clans that i would have banned in this case: Kojak (kenta) and FF (gnajda)
I think kojak shouldn't have been ding that, they dropped kenta themselves after commuinty pressure, FF didn't.
Parent
Yes but it took them alot of time to realise that he was cheating. Was a nice decision by kojak idd, specially because they apologized n stuff. FF didnt even apologized publically to their enemies.
Parent
haha, that was funny idd. whole community already knew he was cheating, I mean, everyone knew. they kept on playing with him. only after weeks they decided to drop him as they were afraid they would get kicked out of eurocup.
Parent
If i'm not mistaken, i guess kenta had some obvious wallhack action on braundorf loooooooong before?
Parent
I dont know/remember :<
Parent
that's something gnajda never had
Parent
mAus and his team would have been banned aswell!! (dunno remember which team it was)
Parent
Do you believe a tournament admins discretion is sufficient to decide if players've knowingly played with a cheater and to ban them from future competitions on a case by case basis - or should everyone associated with be shown the door?

ive missed that part...i voted no, but with i would like to change my vote to: "FUCK YES!!!"
Dont ban me because chizz6l and illumise are hacking please :<
plz the only place collective punishment is good is in schools or army.

and there are reasons why...
Disagree if team don't know if player is cheater. But agree if team cl and others take busted players.
Collective punishment just isn't enough. We need CORPORAL PUNISHMENT for the cheaters ( and the betrayers who play with them)!
if the team knowingly played with a cheater... then yes!
you are fools
of course yes, but only if the team knew he was cheating (can't really prove that)
I voted yes, but it should only apply for the competitions that they are currently playing in that said cheater has played in aswell. this should not ban these players from furthur competitions, except the cheater himself.

Edit-

I answered the main title yes, but the notes underneath the Poll no - Its probably the most stupid question ever ... no offense nellie :P ... just anyone saying yes to that part of it would be a complete retard.

but... if said player was a hacker previously, his teammates should get a short global ban because of it.
Bleh, reads fine to me =[ served its purpose, generated some debate - be better than a juices poll :p
Parent
read fine yes, but anyone saying yes to that means they either believe the admins have mindreading powers or are a bit dim xD
Parent
40% of poll voters are cheaters
wow that comment was great :D
Parent
41.7 now. you're only arguing cause you voted no, and no ofc means you cheat! nice selfbust!
Parent
well u say u never play with a cheater but then u say u once played with sup3r and according to some guys logic u would be banned atm and they never cared if u knew or not that before sup3r got busted, coz where is this line where u can say this info was given in ventrilo, u heard him/saw him or he used wallhack. And then can u be sure that all players from that team knew 1 guy was hacking or maybe only 1-2 knew it, such generalizing is stuupid, u have to take team by team to decide
when they played a cup with a cheater, they should be expulsed from that cup and the cheater should be banned.
however this shouldn't apply to other cups.
ppl get banned if they play on public with hax i thought
I thought so too!
Parent
No, i won't start spamming now!
Parent
According to the United Nations Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination,

the term "racial discrimination" shall mean any distinction, exclusion, restriction or preference based on race, colour, descent, or national or ethnic origin which has the purpose or effect of nullifying or impairing the recognition, enjoyment or exercise, on an equal footing, of human rights and fundamental freedoms in the political, economic, social, cultural or any other field of public life.
Of Course i agree ....

Its a pity that new "zero tollerance policy" had started with pl community ;/ I hope that you will stick with this policy from now on.
national!
he never said it was a race, he said u were a racist. there u go
racism has a more general definition
If they are playing with known cheater then yes ,otherwise not . It is usually very hard to know if someone from your team is cheating or have cheated in past
In general admins are not up to this job in my opinion. But if there were decent admins around to look at these cases I would welcome the decision to ban the team who is playing with a cheater, if they knowingly play with the cheating asstard.
only for xiiting in wars
Most of the time the team doesnt even know he cheats,

But in gnajda case for sure.
depends of the case, for example:

gnadja & FF - yes
razz & helix - no
yes, in case the members know it.
and don't give me that bullshit that you cannot tell if your member is cheating or not, it is so obvious, you might miss it if you play a single war but it gets repetitive..

so I say if a clan has existed for a while already and a member gets busted only recently, that is enough to ban the rest of the team as well.

it's basically like knowing about a murder in real life, if you don't tell the police it can be thought of as interfering the investigation.

e-crime :L
A team is most likely aware of players cheating or atleast should be aware, becuase that should be your own investigation. Therefore I think that one player is responsible or atleast when he is a representive for the team, being a player, the entire team should get kicked when he cheats.
morrigu is to blame, sure, I know that, the whole morrigu chapter was a failure anyway. but if you really didnt know who n30 was, even before cpc2 etc, then why have u not mentioned this before?

I'm not feeling sore because of the EC quali, I have never placed any blame of that on to you.

before recruiting xav, I didnt know who he was and I had never heard of him. emoreh told me to take him, I took him. xav was suspicious in my eyes since I've had never heard of him before. emoreh stood up for him, he told how some reload players were at his house when he was playing and he played just the same. not to mention emorej has known xav for years. besides all that, I havent ever seen anything hax like from xav, besides that one .avi xpaz did, if thats really the best action out of all the stuff that has been made out of him, I really wouldnt call him a cheater.

lastly, do you still have the demos of N30 from that EC match against us?

and no, I dont think you knew what im going to reply since I didnt either and it took some time to write this reply.
i don't have those demos anymore but i think he still has them, not sure.

xav always played very weird imo but maybe it's jut different to play with someone to see he cheats than to play against him, when i play against people i get the idea someone is cheating way quicker than when i spec them
Parent
xav has unique playing style, true, but its not suspicious if you think of his actions, all of this always comes down to a common sense, if you dont have it, you cant see if someone is cheating or not.
Parent
i just heard the reason why everyone pinged out in your EC qualifier, apparently wesbo asked one of his friends to ping out your entire team (i cannot confirm this, i heard it and it seems some other people know this as well)

anyway he sent me the demos http://rapidshare.com/files/126318445/demos.rar.html can't find those grush demos he says
Parent
well I knew about this pinging thing already, apparently wukas or someone was doing it. he was only able to ping those whom had their ip's showing on irc. that being xav kev atleast.

and im pretty much only interested in the gr demo as that was the map where I believe he was cheating.
Parent
hmm okay well i never heard of it, still very lame though.

and i never saw the goldrush demo either
Parent
so was it such a surprise you didnt find cheats on the match then? he had like nearly 11k compared to 7k or so in gr if I remember correctly.
Parent
perhaps, didn't find the fb demo too striking. but would be weird to cheat in one map and don't play that extraordinary on the other since it was their only chance to get in ec but i dunno
Parent
yes, in case the members know it.

so i voted no

edit: I played in a clan few months ago where one player was "too good". Other members of the clan couldnt say he is a cheater or not, so if I would play a cup with that team and we are kicked beacuse we had a cheater then its unfair. :x
Dunno if i was clear.
razz cheating in 2006, punishing helix was wrong!
plus he didnt know England is part of Europe so CB wasnt right, punishing someone who is dumbo :x Sorry razz
Parent
gnajda is clean leave him alone
bullshit in ET, if you do so this means there only 4 teams left
for me its still unclear if gnajda cheated or not. i have seen no hard evidence of it and none of those avis were even close to suspicious for me. its just a retarded decision to ban the players considering the fact that its possible gnajda didnt even cheat.
"Do you agree with collectivly punishing the team of a cheater?"

Yes, depending how this is portrayed.

If the cheater plays in a cup match with the team, and is proven to have cheated in that match - it will affect the whole team - of course.

"Do you believe a tournament admins discretion is sufficient to decide if players've knowingly played with a cheater and to ban them from future competitions on a case by case basis - or should everyone associated with be shown the door?"

Having two similar, but all different, questions in the same poll isn't wise.

So no for this option.

I wouldn't ban players just because they've played with cheaters. Unless, they themselves admit knowing that they knew the guy was cheating. Since, you can't really prove that they knew about it in any other way. Unless, it is so obvious, and with obvious, I mean obvious. Not some suspicious things happening once in match.

There is no simple answer to this poll.
Yes.
punished in the matches they've played with the cheater hell yea, but banning the team from future cups should be no
what about fab?
Only if the guy is really obvious cheater, Dont want to ban some low+ team that has similary playing to them cheater.
Yes but the admins have to have impeccable judgment. In the case of FF, I think that was just for members to be excluded from certain competitions.

If someone in your team turns on a wallhack suddenly in a game and gets kicked by PB, there's nothing the team could really do. That would be harsh if the entire team got banned/kicked.
"Yes but the admins have to have impeccable judgment"

Does that even exist? :)
Parent
Some are better than others! But no, it doesn't!
Parent
yes, considering the fact that anyway naga and wiadro are cheating too, the other members could only be aware of it and protecting him/them.
depends on "if the team could be possible cheaters".
Don’t even argue with polacks, mate
look @ them , so many are ashamed to put their country’s flag @ xfire & putting fake one in their profile instead. & so fucking funny that they whine about racism.
As 1 polish guy said – about 50 % of polish players above med skill have bimbot , since it costs 10 -15 euro @ & even poor polacks can afford it.
Admins Just should ban them all from serious competitions, like Euro & National cups, seriously.
Let them play their own polish cups,
If it's absolutely 100% certain that they knew, then yes. In that case it's not collective punishment, it's a ban for knowingly allowing cheats to be used within the team.

I don't think it's possible to know for certain that they were aware though (unless they confess), so no.
Back to top