The NC Ping Debate!
•
25 Jan 2009, 14:52
•
Polls
Should CB NC be played on equal pinging servers for both sides?
Inspired by Giftys Post poll on behalf of Overdive
Inspired by Giftys Post poll on behalf of Overdive
|
70.0 %
(787 votes)
|
|
18.8 %
(211 votes)
|
|
11.2 %
(126 votes)
|
edit: oh my comment is that YES, ET is about competition and there have always been major disputes about server and ping (especially when it comes to NC's or Worldcups), my 2 cents is that 1server per map of each opponents choice, I know this doesnt exactly work for ettv but it keeps things undisputable.
same conditions for everyone!!
The whole server whine is just another excuse to cover up failure. If people really need it that bad to play on a server with low ping, then they should also whine within Europe and protest against Polish, Spanish and other eastern European servers where their ping is also high.
No. So GTFO with your "they're used to it", if they beat you on equal ping they're simply better than you.
if israel teams played every team at 150 ping vs. 150 ping they would be EC winners every time. not because its "fair" but because eu teams arent used to play with 150 ping like israel teams are.
Giving different teams disadvantages merely because they come from specific countries sound VERY dodgy to me, no matter how you twist and turn it. And besides, what would happen if they had 50 ping? You think they'd play equally good, or better?
usually il people have ~98 ping, which is an very good ping, nothing different than 48 :P
i think slovenia needs to have a second rematch, and having an new CB rule, which makes NC not aneuropean competition
else disqualify slovenia (nothing agaist them, but australia and .jp are great, but playing 200-300 ping vs 50 ping just aint fair)
and screw people who are saying "we are used to 150 ping" it's not true, we either play on 50 ping on our home servers, or some have good pings to play on eu
my opinion: get used to playing with high pings or dont join NC. if this was world cup it would be a different story.
But my suggestion would be that make European Nations Cup also, then there wouldn't be whining about playing on US server. atm there's like 2 big cups OC/EC and NC just make it 3 and do EuroNC and we have 1 more big cup that makes ET more alive (that part is for the guys telling fo don't kill ET with kicking these high ping countries)
I would rather play competitive and fun than competitive and not fun
but it's not a matter of want, it's a question of will... no one in their right mind would WANT to play with 200 ping...
YEAH COS IT'S JUST SO LOGICAL THAT we play with 150+ping all the time. in australia we don't have any local servers or local ladders. nah we all play in the american league whatever it is now.
sigh
I voted yes because I think in the intrest of fair play you should play on a server which evens the pings out. Care for the CB rules people are hiding behind these CB rules because they are scared they will loose without them.
voted yes, then again.. ive been playing with a shit ping myself for years....
it could either be 48 vs 300+ or 150(max) vs 200+
it takes like... a 10 minutes warmup to get used to a 150 ping, not more. So instead of showing up late or anything 1 can use the 10 minutes between the arranged match time, to the latest match start, so 10 minutes, which always ends up being alot more anyways.
for an eu person, anything above 150 shouldnt be accepted. but 150 is playable with a 10 minute warmup, thats how long it takes to get used to. Like that EU teams still have the advantadge over the non-EU teams, and that 50ms or so difference, is brilliant as that evens out the fact that the touchy EU ppl aren't 'used' to such a ping.
This is the closest 1 can get to an equal international match, which is the fairest way. At the end of the day, the better team will generally win no matter the ping, as long as there isnt a standout ping.
At the end of the day, 200+ ping sucks anyways, so used to it or not, its horrible, so the mentality of high pingers having an advantage is pure bs.
totally agree with you
If both teams have the same ping, this issue is equalized.
Edit: And it couldn't be named 'Euro Cup' because the name was already taken...
Dont say "you guys" cause we have dick to do with it. CB sets it up under the pretense that all nations are welcome & you can't fault any nation for entering.
Which is also run by CB which simple reasoning says that
EuroCup = European
NationsCup = All Nations
http://clanbase.ggl.com/rules.php?lid=8339
like i said: non eu teams are because of an exception
this means: IF Chile REALLY want to play in NC, Chiefs MAY do the exception TO ALLOW Chile in the tournament, but that doesnt mean Chile have the SAME rights, but their rights are EXCEPTIONAL.
A fact that they even play in this competition is exceptional already in its essence.
Allowing Chile to play in a competition is itself already an exception to the rules.
Chile are in NC on special rights.
Reasoning would take into consideration the fact that CB is European league.
Therefore 'NationsCup' term gets specific meaning.
you can't compare RL sports with e-sports ;) but funny still
just practise a little bit before the game with a 150 ping
Swallow your pride and play for fun. South American people are quite cool tbh.
its not about people its about pings. if this was on a lan i dont care who the opponent is.
Only European teams who play in a European country, Russia or Israel may participate. Exceptions may be given by the Chiefs of Cups.
- mundus I have no clue why didn't you let us play with Slovenia and Australia with Chile... I really don't; you could have avoided all this mess;
add that thing where we can see who voted for No and Yes.
competive = equal ping
fun = low ping
not fun = high ping
conclusion: equal ping with eu and non eu teams = not fun
If it was COD4 i woudn't want to play with 150 ping though, but ET, yes.
Obviously, yes. Teams which are not European should not even be allowed to play, though. Playing with high ping is NOT fun.
The reality is that we're living in 2009, not 2059 - right now global infrastructure isn't at a level where we can have inter-continental online competitions with low ping. We should realise that and focus on a competitive European cup instead of the special olympics 'it's the taking part that counts' mentality that we seem to be shifting towards.
theoretically light needs 50ms on 15000km (eg: eu - australia)
2. Even if networks are build 100% using optical cables, it's never going to be 15000km in distance, at least 2 times longer.
For example if a football team play against a poor football team that has no left football boot then you cant force the richer team play without the left boot, right? :D Only if they want "for fun".
If you don't want a fair competition go outside and beat up a 5 year old kid.
For those saying that it is supposed to be an European Cup and the other teams are an exception, so they don't have equal rights blabla...
There are some European teams out there which rather have a fair match and have thus decided to play on equal ping servers. This means the fair European teams are at a disadvantage over those that decide to be nazi about the pings, therefore you are also causing unequal conditions among European teams.
So either force equal pings or disallow non-European teams.
forgot to put FAIRNESS in the poll!!
learn to play according to the fairness of the game and not to winwinwin only blehh
thats why cheating is considered to be bad for fair competition!! that why they dont let any1 play with that stuff..
so yes aproximatly the same ping gives aproximaly the same conditions for both teams
shouldn't this be obvious for everybody?
if someone only wants to play on european servers and vs european people, then he should just forget about NC as it's a worldwide cup and play other tournaments only inside Europe.
fair play m8s
below 100 = np
100-150 = np, feels different
150-200 = playable if stable, pain in the ass for rifle
above 200 = unacceptable if not used to
should both teams ping lower than 200 and have ping difference at max 100 i see absolutely no problem!
voted no.
Voted for equal pings though.
but i'd like to add something, even if it isnt closely related to the topic
"Europe is the westernmost peninsula of the continent of Eurasia; its limits are well defined by sea to the North, South and West. The Ural mountains are usually taken as the eastern limit of Europe, along with the Ural River, and the Caspian Sea. Europe can be considered bounded to the southeast by the Caucasus Mountains, the Black Sea and the waterways connecting the Black Sea to the Mediterranean"
lets now take a look at some maps
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/fc/Map_of_Europe_(political).png
check the legend to see what is what
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/d/dd/Map-Coeurope.jpg
map with all the european states
what cb and other leagues should do when naming cups (such as EC) is either name cup otherwise or make sure countries allowed to participate in the event are inside regional boundaries given by the cups name
And also, European means different things from geographical point of view and e.g. politological point of view.
Do you know that from historical point of view, XIX century started in 1815 and XX in 1918?
i'm not saying, cb or any other league _MUST_ name cup properly, i'm only saying they should. reason for it is simple - it makes no sense to do otherwise.
Which country there is problem with, in your opinion?
- Azerbaijan or smth like that? - It is not allowed because they dont have enough players living there I guess.
- Uzbekistan? No problem - they cant play since Uzbekistan is out of Europe, both politologically and politically.
By the way, you are right that geographical map shouldnt be taken into consideration. Reason is simple: we are talking about countries/states, and geographical division doesnt tolerate borders of countries.
Also, you shouldnt mistake politological pov for formal (international law's perspective), etc. Council of Europe's pov is political/formal, not politological. :-) Hope you see the difference.
Cheers!
:DDDDDDD
And its really nice to see some talents from australia and japan thats true, wish we could have same ping.
I don't like playing with ping over 100. Everyone can kill me on public server when Im having ping 150 :(
i would love to play against you on a LAN or sth... over the net is just pointless and a waste of time... sry
Are you serious?
are probably in the worst situation, as we are the furtherest away from europe, making it more difficult to find a server. knowing this however, we were prepared to play with higher than even ping to our opposition to minimise the impact on them. say 250 vs 150
are in a slightly better position as they will ping 50ms less then us, making it easier to minimise the impact on the Europeans. they played Portugal on a server where it was 200 vs ~150-170, which is fair and playable at the same time.
i can't really comment on countries like chile/brazil, but i imagine central/east USA servers are pretty good for them, making it easier again.
imo the better team will win no matter what if pings are even up to 200 and those saying outside nations will win because they are somehow used to playing on that ping is completely misguided.
give the et cradleland 'U.S.A' a chance :)
give the good Asian players a chance :)
and the South America ~~~~~
You forgot Africa, Alaska,... :)
I voted NO!