Do you agree with the latest decision regarding trick jumping on supply?
•
14 Jul 2010, 10:53
•
Polls
With the ClanBase Summer Cup ready to start, a new improvement has been made for the lately released beta configs.
As for the past most decisions have been made to make it easier for the attacking side to reach the objective. Now, as supply has shown to be a full hold map on recent events, it becomes even worse for the attackers as their freedom in creativity and space to infiltrate the last stage has become less ET-ish and less fast paced. You can compare this decision to disallowing the wall jump on oasis in the past.
It's a good thing to keep the ways as the map was ment to be. There is no point in allowing an easy to go jump which doesn't take you a second to do and which doesn't result in a long way in compared to others.
Donwload the config and further information
As for the past most decisions have been made to make it easier for the attacking side to reach the objective. Now, as supply has shown to be a full hold map on recent events, it becomes even worse for the attackers as their freedom in creativity and space to infiltrate the last stage has become less ET-ish and less fast paced. You can compare this decision to disallowing the wall jump on oasis in the past.
-or-
It's a good thing to keep the ways as the map was ment to be. There is no point in allowing an easy to go jump which doesn't take you a second to do and which doesn't result in a long way in compared to others.
Donwload the config and further information
|
24.3 %
(355 votes)
|
|
47.6 %
(695 votes)
|
|
28.1 %
(410 votes)
|
Better luck next time, fucker!
http://www.crossfire.nu/?x=forum&mode=item&id=33654
1. It should be decided by a community vote rather than a small group of friends.
2. If it is gonna be done, let someone that knows how to actually script properly do it, seeing a random hp/ammo tray placed there by mister harley davidson is kind of annoying x-)
bullshit change ...
never really liked that tbh
and ppl who whine can still boost from that so hf jumping over it if its such a big deal for u
I just have two words for these people. FUCK OFF.
somehow i fail to see that :/ , fullholds were more likely in 6o6 but now its much easier to attack then to defend.
hey I have an idea.
Lets remove main gate instead. There is no point in allowing an easy route which doesnt take you a second to go through and is slower than the trickjump
Not as many can do the trickjump as you think too
im trying do this tj for 6 months and cant do it :<
You can learn that jump in 1 sec ...
Many maps aren't designed to have people trick jumping a wall/window/rock, tho TJ is just part of the game. Can't believe you are saying such a statement.
post random comment
Boost west, jump east rock (x3 different ways), boost main, trick-jump main rock (x2 ways), trick-jump main gate team door (x1 way)?...
I don't really see why leaving it as is is an issue... whether someone boosts or trick-jumps they are still gaining the same advantage using either method and it is often one of those moves that assists in breaking crossfire setups.
Oh wait nah.. let's give Tosspot and co more Supply full holds to shout-cast and remove all dynamic game-play elements from maps.
great job, really something to be proud of
+it's not like it's the easiest jump ever, unlike for example wall jump on oasis or east jump
????????????????????????????????????????????
I have never seen a doubt fullhold on supply in 5on5, and I have only seen a 15minute defense in some overload match
Kama Yes, good decision
Krosan Yes, good decision
Jere Yes, good decision
Yossarian Yes, good decision
AM1G0 Yes, good decision
Lo0SeR Yes, good decision
aSmOgAn Yes, good decision
slajdan Yes, good decision
snailbot Yes, good decision
Zedd Yes, good decision
mama Yes, good decision
Zymon Yes, good decision
Viperish Yes, good decision
urtier Yes, good decision
mAhla Yes, good decision
PMCGc0bra Yes, good decision
Ahuu Yes, good decision
KESKUSRIKOSPOLIISI Yes, good decision
teTsu0 Yes, good decision
hizzy Yes, good decision
m1ke Yes, good decision
ViQuel Yes, good decision
tomeka2 Yes, good decision
Em0ReJ! Yes, good decision
kevlar Yes, good decision
JiPp0 Yes, good decision
rahula Yes, good decision
RookieF Yes, good decision
Qmm Yes, good decision
jaaN Yes, good decision
aNSI Yes, good decision
mens0 Yes, good decision
Edik Yes, good decision
chmpp Yes, good decision
sunni Yes, good decision
marcingieblo Yes, good decision
Eirik Yes, good decision
Vivitore Yes, good decision
carlito Yes, good decision
senn Yes, good decision
zenix Yes, good decision
knnk Yes, good decision
slayerrrr Yes, good decision
lollipop Yes, good decision
h20xyg3n Yes, good decision
fantaxd Yes, good decision
Skype Yes, good decision
crAshull Yes, good decision
Fragma Yes, good decision
Nyke Yes, good decision
Ince Yes, good decision
S7umf Yes, good decision
HARM0NY Yes, good decision
Cojiine Yes, good decision
haZe Yes, good decision
FLEXdaSLUT Yes, good decision
CeeOhTwo Yes, good decision
Trev Yes, good decision
we3D Yes, good decision
Krein Yes, good decision
drago Yes, good decision
RoXoR Yes, good decision
nAzty Yes, good decision
eVo Yes, good decision
Miroslav Klose Yes, good decision
ToDeSoMa Yes, good decision
fableb0t Yes, good decision
Rockskin Yes, good decision
Perkele Yes, good decision
iGlooW Yes, good decision
krc Yes, good decision
mnew Yes, good decision
Baggiez Yes, good decision
dialer Yes, good decision
NoHead Yes, good decision
crook Yes, good decision
Prydz Yes, good decision
NokiaXpress Yes, good decision
maza Yes, good decision
FLoPJEHZ Yes, good decision
Maani Yes, good decision
reAz Yes, good decision
hasta Yes, good decision
Pepper Yes, good decision
antman Yes, good decision
KennyHotz Yes, good decision
NoXi0us Yes, good decision
RES0 Yes, good decision
Olpen Yes, good decision
Oxy Yes, good decision
nips Yes, good decision
siVek Yes, good decision
duKe_ Yes, good decision
wedeus Yes, good decision
jenz0r Yes, good decision
jackh4mmer Yes, good decision
hahahaha biggest whiner on CF voting "yes" :DDDDDDDDD he's part of this crapcomitte right?
The percentages clearly show that hardly any fucker wants the change.
Don't fix it if it aint broken.
FUCK YEAH, NOW FIX YOUR MISTAKE
i am not sure, but somehow block the tj-scripts if there exist any would be enough :o
Disabling it because not all players can jump this? Lets disable headshots, not all players can aim on head!
dont worry mate, i got your back :s
cu aef
Such exciting experiments.
fuck your ideas
you smart
shut the fuck up polak faggot
+1 what Freze said
Secondly, the changes weren't thought of by any admins, it was from a collection of top players, who know much more of the current state of ET than you.
You mean who ? :D
'who know much more of the current state of ET than you.'
You know me ?
its not that hard after you learn it.. you can easily make it with every 2nd try. =)
Like somebody comment before that we can not be fullheld then!
This is a very weak aspect of view.It tells that you and your team is so bad to attack another opponent trough main east or west and have to use east sneaky jump to get behind them backrape or spawn rape and then scream " fu noobs you are just to low skilled "
A very good decision,using exploits in games show how weak you are.Learn to attack without trickjumps then it is more fun and gives more reason to coordinate team attacks than relie on invidual trickjumpers in the team!
thanks for removing it :XD