whats ur cod4 fps ?

by bambo • 10 Nov 2007, 13:25 • Forums › Off Topic
Cause there are a lot of ppl with the problem they can't play cod4 with good fps and who want to upgrade their system, i would ask you to post your system specs + your avarage cod4 fps +your lowest fps

edit: + the detail level you are playing at (thx flyingdj)

kk thx bb :)
Comments
62
▼
pred 10 Nov 2007, 13:29
is there any benchmark?
▼
pumu 10 Nov 2007, 13:33
c2d e6600 @ 3ghz / 2 gb ram / 8600gt

1024x768 @ med details

fps: 100+
▼
pala 10 Nov 2007, 13:36
Computer companys realy making millions of money from retards who "upgrades" their computers for new games. Just advice, upgrade is hell more expensive than buying a new pc.
▼
ScarZy 10 Nov 2007, 13:38
Um no its not.. we BUILD them?
Parent
▼
pala 10 Nov 2007, 15:18
Check my reply to bambo. ;)
Parent
▼
Arphetic 10 Nov 2007, 13:42
Depends on who builds the PC. If its your local computer shop it will only be more expensive. If its smth liek dell, i wouldnt know
Parent
▼
bambo 10 Nov 2007, 13:53
wtf :p

most ppl can play this game with a new vga ( 100-200 eur)
when you have to buy a new computer you spent +-800 eur. just because you have to buy a lot of things you don't need actually, like a new motherboard, a new harddrive, new ram, and new dvd writer, a new case, etc etc
Parent
▼
pala 10 Nov 2007, 15:17
If you buy the latest PC fully upgraded you will have much easier time in the next games, every time theres new games coming, every week it could be, you will have to switch upgrades more lately.
Parent
▼
bambo 10 Nov 2007, 15:19
just read what i said
Parent
▼
pala 10 Nov 2007, 15:54
This is where most are wrong. I'll tell you why. I bought an cheap mp4 one, just wanted to listen to some music, not many. Now after my playlist got bigger, I needed a bigger hardsick for my mp4, a simpley better one. In total, if I would buy expensive one with more upgrades, it might actually be worth to use it laters on. You dont know if you will get a new work and you will ned big hardisk.
Parent
▼
bambo 10 Nov 2007, 16:12
kazz pls :p read what i say:p
when you buy a new pc, you pay for a lot of things you don't need.
i'm sure i can make a better pc with 400 euros when i upgrade my pc than you with 600 euros when you buy a new one
Parent
▼
pala 10 Nov 2007, 16:14
Who knows when you will ned all the upgrades you dont need. :S
Parent
▼
vargen 10 Nov 2007, 17:03
Your out of luck kaazz. Nobody understands you! ;)
Parent
▼
Spirea 10 Nov 2007, 21:35
that can't be true :p

comparing all parts that u buy for new PC or just some parts that u buy for old PC, the old one must be cheaper
Parent
▼
pala 10 Nov 2007, 21:37
That's 100% true. :P But I'm sure there are plenty more games who will soon arrive, GW2 for example. You will need to upgrade your PC AGAIN to play it. ;) And if your upgrades are powerfull enough to handle new games, it must be quite expensive, paying few more bucks and you got a better deal. ;)
Parent
▼
duNzy 10 Nov 2007, 13:40
2800+ athlon 64 / 1,5 GB RAM / 9600 256MB ATI

800x600@low-med detail

between 40 and 70 fps.
▼
Deactivated3024 10 Nov 2007, 13:42
AMD64 5200+ / 2 GB RAM / 8800 GTX

1280x1024@high detail

~~160fps
▼
Arphetic 10 Nov 2007, 13:43
naid vidcard!
Parent
▼
Scorchiii 10 Nov 2007, 13:46
E6600 2x 2.40 GHz, 2GB RAM, GeForce 7950GT

low settings ~ 100 -125 fps
high settings ~ 40 - 50 fps
▼
tetsuo 10 Nov 2007, 13:46
maxfps i play it on ps3 ;<
▼
bambo 10 Nov 2007, 13:54
thats the 4th time i read you saying you are playing cod4 at ps3 :D
Parent
▼
jor 10 Nov 2007, 13:53
Dude he's in a special english class, he belongs to the best of em!
▼
w1Za 10 Nov 2007, 13:56
AMD 64 3700+
1GB RAm
Geforce 7800gtx

steady 75 fps on every map with raz' cfg
▼
Skydeh 10 Nov 2007, 13:56
Upgrading my system next week....

Intel Core 2 Duo - 2.8GHZ
XFX 8800GT 512mb
4GB Corsair DDR Ram 5-5-5

WootWoot!
▼
bambo 10 Nov 2007, 14:00
don't make me jalous pls :<
Parent
▼
rize 10 Nov 2007, 14:01
is this game more fps-lagger as quakewars?
▼
bambo 10 Nov 2007, 14:02
+- same on my pc
Parent
▼
BrooodjeAap 10 Nov 2007, 14:10
it runs much smoother
Parent
▼
kiss 10 Nov 2007, 14:02
Q6600 , 2 GIG DDR , 8800 GTS 320
1280*1024*highest , AAx4

100 fps
▼
st4tic 10 Nov 2007, 14:03
i can only speak about the demo atm

q6600
8600gts
2gb 900MHz 5-5-5-15

medium detail
1680x1050

not less than 60 anywhere
▼
Reatard 10 Nov 2007, 14:03
60fps steady, max effects and such, 1080p resolution (1920x1080)
▼
Quazz 10 Nov 2007, 14:10
0FPS , cant play it ^^
▼
seconddd 10 Nov 2007, 14:15
lol, me neighter stupid game :D
Parent
▼
Deactivated6284 10 Nov 2007, 14:20
E4400
2GB Corsair 800Mhz
7600GT overclocked
125 fps but not on full effects
▼
crawazaky 10 Nov 2007, 14:24
system @ profile - mid details (somehow to see better) 1024*768 = 125 FPS
▼
NobAdI 10 Nov 2007, 14:27
200~ and 1333 in ET ;)
▼
crumbs 10 Nov 2007, 14:37
125 pretty stable at 1440x900
and unstable 125-333
▼
rahula 10 Nov 2007, 14:41
~80 at low

AMD 4600+, 2 x 7600gt, 2gb ram
▼
Cnfys 10 Nov 2007, 17:37
lol, why its so low ? =/
Parent
▼
dahPEARL 10 Nov 2007, 15:08
why should i use fps in some game? i never use it.
▼
smokey151 10 Nov 2007, 22:53
welcome to the console
Parent
▼
Immor7al 10 Nov 2007, 15:34
Extra/High/High Texture settings.
Resolution 1024x768 and everything on standard but shadows, they are off. And 4x aa and 8x af in my drivers.

76 Fps stable, with athlon64 3000+ @ 2.55 Ghz and x850xt-pe.
▼
Penn 10 Nov 2007, 17:09
PC specs in my profile

125fps using 1680x1050 with highest settings apart from AA turned off.
▼
Krato 10 Nov 2007, 17:59
40 on most places, sometime 50/60 inside, and in heavy battle 25/30
▼
destiny 8 Feb 2008, 04:14
unlimited
Back to top