Geert Wilders' film about the Quran
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3369102968312745410
A movie about the islamic terror, it's about 16 minutes but very important, there is a big hype over it now and it's being banned quite fast because of muslem threats.
edit:
Things like that are never old... it's like saying classic music is old...
A movie about the islamic terror, it's about 16 minutes but very important, there is a big hype over it now and it's being banned quite fast because of muslem threats.
edit:
Things like that are never old... it's like saying classic music is old...
Oh really new :o
BAN!!
So basically classic music is new?
I just generally wish that anybody like that would keep their anger and fucked up morals and idealisms in their own countries, and leave us alone. Not to mention terrorists generally do more damage to their own religion than they do to anyone else; inflaming racisms and mistrust.
Don't agree with it either.
She's an American Christian Conservative nutjob.
From reading this statement, I'm interested in your background. Are you of any particular faith?
I'd like to think I'm very open minded too, and although I have no problem with Muslims as people, as religious followers nobody can deny that what they teach causes death e.g. september the 11th albeit due to different interpretations by different groups.
Pots 'n kettles.
And in case anyone didn't read my previous post, I AM only talking about the extremists, even though it IS the religion itself that causes this extremism. There aren't any other religions that have caused extremism like this. And yes, I do realise that a lot of the people who follow the religion are no different to myself - some of them probably far nicer people, but there's no denying that this DOES only happen where people follow Islam.
An interesting phrase, is the irony intentional? A differing of opinion is exactly why we’re in Iraq.
And Yes thankfully the western world seems to’ve progressed somewhat (though there’s still Guantanamo Bay, Bagram Airbase, Abu Ghraib, plus the acceptable collateral murders from airstrikes).
No it's not and yes there is. See Hellhammers posts further down. There’s many many many underlying causes. You honestly believe it’s as simple as Islam being evil?
No, I don't think Islam is evil whatsoever, and in the hands of educated, decent people then I'd happily leave them to it. It's somewhat like knives being made to do good, however it's incredibly easy for them to be used for bad - far more than in any other religion. Which other religion over the past century has caused some it's followers to actively leave their countries in order to go and kill OTHER people? Maybe if there are similar religions my view will change, but then I'll only believe that they're just as bad for the world.
I don't think we're going to change each others views, but thanks for your thoughts :p
“The right war for the wrong reasons”. Yes Saddam was evil, as were the UN imposed sanctions. Though we’re getting off topic.
In the last century? Probably not to the same extent, not through the same means (i.e. suicide bombers). Though there has been notable atrocities, justified, as it were, through other religions. From Christian anti-abortion fundamentalists, terrorising, attacking, and in cases, “justifiable homicide” of doctors to the Northern Ireland troubles, which though loosely related to religion, played a large role. (I do consider the Northern Ireland situation as a reasonable analogy, underlying problems metamorphosing themselves into religious doctrine, hatred, bile and eventually the bombing of civilians. They may not’ve cried out praise be to God, but their religion gave them an identity.), to the Orthodox Jews in Israel and their targeting of journalists, UN delegations and peace activists, through means including pipe bombs and assassinations to the Hindu terrorists in India linked with the bombings of trains, to the murder of Muslims and the sporadic uprisings and riots. Religion the world over can be manipulated and abused, as can many ideologies.
Yes the Islamic attacks, though probably bore from local indoctrination and problems, have gone global. But the world has never before been so connected, never before been so technologically advanced. Cheap flights, the internet, telephones – I can be anywhere in the world within 24 hours. I can visit a terrorist training camp in Pakistan, learn how to shoot a gun in the US and learn how to fly in Somerset within a week. I think the conclusion that the scale and scope of the attacks is due to Islam is incorrect, they’re a child of our connected times.
I do believe Jason Burke’s summary below is as eloquent and more informed an opinion than I could offer. The usual problem when discussing things such as this against a more hardline view is you invariably end up appearing to defend the terrorists. Which I’m at pain not to. But I’d also strongly advise against generalising about such a large populous, spanning half the globe and including so many differing, sometimes diametrically opposed cultures. Religion and culture are so intrinsically linked it’s difficult to tell when one ends, the other begins.
Jeez mammoth post! To close, I think our difference in outlook stems from the fact I strongly believe generalisations can never be more than a snapshot. The individual, not the collective, is of importance.
Would thoroughly recommend, a fantastic insight from a guy on the ground pre-9/11, offering a non-judgmental overview of what caused all this.
More generally I'd say anyone generalising about 1.3 billion people, spanning half the globe is a fucking moron of the highest degree (to the comments above).
Islam is being tailored to suit the needs of specific areas, local problems given an international prominence through a shared escapism, and as you say, fantasism. Though not in my opinion, an intertwined jihad against the collective west (enmasse).
I'd say more generally improving the quality of life (i.e. clean running water, food, electricity, sanitation) should be the priority – tackle corruption, warring, absolute poverty and disease – leading to prosperity, which as you say, requires education. If the west has shown us anything it's that as a society evolves into a more prosperous and decadent place, religion takes a back foot. The extremities aren’t required by the masses.
explain how a religion can be fucked up, especially that one from your comment
Islam doesn't teach this, where did you get that from.. check Nellie's comment below to clear up your mind dude
John 15:6