slac aimbot

by czetus • 1 Mar 2011, 19:19 • Forums › Cheaters
http://www.republika.pl/getus/2011-03-01-110930-supply.dm_84

watch in wolfcam2, wanna avi? make it also promo cheater/s
follow 12 forget !:D

http://sl-anticheat.com/profile.php?id=7253
Comments
64
▼
m1ke 1 Mar 2011, 19:19
SLAC AIMBOT

FINALLY!
▼
ScoOf 1 Mar 2011, 19:20
u got me lol
▼
FLExican 1 Mar 2011, 20:24
too low soz..
Parent
▼
b4lu 1 Mar 2011, 19:21
OMG MONSTER HELMET MUST BE HAX

image: 00007253-1296748642-1906747071
▼
garin 1 Mar 2011, 19:23
the axis player must have 1 big fuckin head :dd
Parent
▼
Deryn 8 Mar 2011, 02:30
ahahaha!!! :D:D
Parent
▼
Casillas 1 Mar 2011, 19:27
seems its not aimbot..... Just one fucking huge head!
Parent
▼
Webe 1 Mar 2011, 20:03
This helmet belongs to Wakizashi from UK
Parent
▼
Sungi 1 Mar 2011, 20:06
:DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
Parent
▼
Aggro 2 Mar 2011, 02:42
:DDDDDDDDDDDDD
Parent
▼
mana 1 Mar 2011, 20:14
HE'S ALREADY IN FIRETEAM, O M G!
Parent
▼
Krii 1 Mar 2011, 19:26
get avi
▼
Exc1te 1 Mar 2011, 22:01
you need lan support :/
Parent
▼
Krii 1 Mar 2011, 22:22
already have :)
Parent
▼
kartez 1 Mar 2011, 19:26
Sorry but
Anti-cheat status: OK
▼
Kenzi 1 Mar 2011, 19:30
WHEN WILL YOU FUCKING UNDERSTAND THAT SLAC BUSTS SILENTLY? WHICH MEANS THAT IT DOESN'T BUST INSTANTLY BUT LATER ON.

DON'T ASK ME WHY.
▼
Wakizashiuk 1 Mar 2011, 19:36
When will you understand that slac is just as useless as pb
Parent
▼
Kenzi 1 Mar 2011, 19:44
At least not everyone tries to cheat.
Parent
▼
Thomm 1 Mar 2011, 19:50
pb wasn't useless.
Parent
▼
dexter 1 Mar 2011, 19:57
how you know ?
Parent
▼
Exc1te 1 Mar 2011, 21:37
PB isn't useless, it just doesn't care about a game where they cannot earn any money on. nC is getting rolled by PB with blackops
Parent
▼
RenX 1 Mar 2011, 23:21
It's getting updates and cought already several cheaters. It's not entirely cleaning ET of cheaters, but keeping the amount small.
Parent
▼
Twikii 1 Mar 2011, 19:55
t'es trop con mec ... que sa ban ou pas silently, si sont cheat est undetected, y sera pas ban.
Parent
▼
Kenzi 1 Mar 2011, 20:09
Qu'est-ce que t'en sais que son cheat est undetected?
Tu prétends que t'as pas arrêté de cheater et que tu joues avec un cheat là?

Et je me passerais bien de tes insultes, tête de bite.
Parent
▼
magico 1 Mar 2011, 21:32
this guy has been cheating for weeks already

these pics are like 3 weeks old:

http://img708.imageshack.us/i/asd3sy.jpg/

same goes for his teammate nasty,whose slac guid is 0000179
Parent
▼
Kenzi 1 Mar 2011, 22:00
QuoteYou don't. SLAC uses silent detections, meaning cheaters are caught, but banned later. Sometimes they'll be banned the same day, sometimes a week later, sometimes a month later.
Parent
▼
Krii 1 Mar 2011, 22:32
a month, lol. thats just there to cover up. when it takes chaplja a month to detect the cheat..
Parent
▼
zaNc 1 Mar 2011, 21:03
yea this guys ia a hacker, i was doing 1v1 with him on bio few months ago, i walked and he always just came behind corned dingdingding, got 1 demo, but it doesnt really prove it
▼
Exc1te 1 Mar 2011, 21:38
Who is this anyway? Should I care? :-/
▼
chaplja 1 Mar 2011, 23:25
you have to understand that stopping all cheats is impossible.. big amount of them is detected, and even more will be in the next update

also.. many caught cheaters are unable to play again.. which is something you couldn't do with PB as they don't use hardware banning for a long time already
▼
hOstiLl 1 Mar 2011, 23:27
big amount of them is detected, and even more will be in the next update


NOT
Parent
▼
Kenzi 1 Mar 2011, 23:36
You hardwareban?
Parent
▼
chaplja 1 Mar 2011, 23:38
yes.. some people even got caught after buying or finding another PC.. some have used several PCs and got them all banned.. it's not the strongest hw ban method atm, but it does its job and will be improved in the next update
Parent
▼
Kenzi 1 Mar 2011, 23:39
Allright, didn't know that. :-)
Parent
▼
cutee 2 Mar 2011, 00:05
dont care about the haters^^
Parent
▼
Exc1te 2 Mar 2011, 13:31
wait they can't play again? So whats up with the silent detection? Doesn't it take ages for them to get banned again if they create a new account? :P
Parent
▼
chaplja 2 Mar 2011, 15:49
if they're hw banned - no
Parent
▼
hOstiLl 1 Mar 2011, 23:27
SLAC = BULLSHIT !!!!!!!!
▼
Burneddi 2 Mar 2011, 02:03
image: cheater
I can almost feel the cheater irony condensing on the ceiling.
Parent
▼
hOstiLl 2 Mar 2011, 09:18
dont be mad, izi to cheat with slac ? btw what is slac ?
Parent
▼
Burneddi 2 Mar 2011, 11:38
Might be just luck, but I haven't seen a single cheater since everyone started using SLAC, other than the ones who play without SLAC, of course. Comparing that to the situation we had with PB (just go to any PB-running ETPro server and you'll see what I mean - there still are dozens of undetected free cheats which have been around for a year) it's awesome.

SLAC is the best thing that has happened to ET since the release of ETPro, deal with it.
Parent
▼
shNz 2 Mar 2011, 13:35
Do you have a knowledge about lotte.prv, these guy have proofed, that it is possible to cheat on SLAC, chaplja said afterwards, that he allready got them busted, but thats just 1 of his lies, where he tries to blend people to keep up their dream of a clean "ET"
Parent
▼
Burneddi 2 Mar 2011, 13:43
http://sl-anticheat.com/profile.php?id=985

Hell yeah they proved it.
Parent
▼
Exc1te 2 Mar 2011, 13:45
thats after their post :-P
Parent
▼
shNz 2 Mar 2011, 15:12
basicly they have had screenshot blocker enabled in earlier matches
http://sl-anticheat.com/screenshot.php?id=83077
Parent
▼
Burneddi 2 Mar 2011, 20:42
That doesn't change the fact that they also had a hook detection in addition to the screenshot proof. So much for the not detecting part.
Parent
▼
1Fach1Genie 1 Mar 2011, 23:45
Knew it from the beginning its just moneymaking, useless fucking target!
▼
Aggro 2 Mar 2011, 02:44
fail
Parent
▼
1Fach1Genie 2 Mar 2011, 14:38
dunno just readed the thing with Lotte.Priv & though its about slac is uselss, and yez it iz
Parent
▼
Aggro 2 Mar 2011, 15:30
nope
Parent
▼
1Fach1Genie 2 Mar 2011, 16:53
There are enough cheaters left
Parent
▼
Equanimity 3 Mar 2011, 02:37
So if a screenshot is blank, it means they use a screenshot blocker?

Well some of my screenshots turned out black, and I don't use their shit

http://sl-anticheat.com/screenshot.php?id=123425

ross: http://sl-anticheat.com/screenshot.php?id=77841

phyzic : http://sl-anticheat.com/screenshot.php?id=1457

This screenshot feature was just a 24 hour test and it caused lag and still in the works, I doubt it's because it was blocked from a hack
▼
hastaf 3 Mar 2011, 15:03
If the screenshot is black your ET is minimized at the same time when slac takes a screenshot. I also got some of those blank screenshots :p No worries
Parent
Back to top