Dear GTV

by SIMOON • 4 Dec 2011, 16:41 • Forums › Enemy Territory
I think you have to do something about match rating.
Seeing two stars on an EC final is weird.

First of all, for ones who are asking "how does GTV rate match" : click here.


I got some ideas for you.

Maybe you should change you rating stuff. ET has less and less players, consenquently ET has less and less viewers.

your rating :

Quote0 - 20 viewers: 0 Stars
20 - 110 viewers: 1 Star
110 - 380 viewers: 2 Stars
380 - 900+ viewers: 3 Stars


example rating :
Quote0 - 15 viewers: 0 Stars
15 - 50 viewers: 1 Star
50 - 150 viewers: 2 Stars
150 - 900+ viewers: 3 Stars


This is just an example, EC final won't have 3 stars anyway with this rating.

We also see teams like EuropeQueens are playing some random late night 3on3. It decrease the average viewers.

What about creating a 5on5/6on6 filter and a 2on2/3on3 filter with different rating count ?
Comments
29
▼
saKen 4 Dec 2011, 16:53
agreed on the part that random 2on2/3on3 games at night fuck up account ratings, don't think many people care about the amount of stars their games get though
▼
Snatix 4 Dec 2011, 17:31
1 star = stats

Always nice to see the stats after a match tbh
Parent
▼
s1LENT 4 Dec 2011, 17:32
they are often bugged anyways
Parent
▼
Snatix 4 Dec 2011, 17:33
yeah i know, but still, even it's bugged, you can have an overall view of the game, and you can see who, for exemple, gave the most damages so if you wanna see some nice shoots during the game, you know who you can spec
Parent
▼
s1LENT 4 Dec 2011, 17:36
You can also have nice shots with less damage than others, damage is still overrated in my opinion.. but its true that it gives a quick info who was outstanding ;)
Parent
▼
Snatix 4 Dec 2011, 17:44
ofc, that's just an exemple :-) But i think most of the viewers are speccing the best aimer / dmg dealer. So i did so many times
Parent
▼
Gemb 4 Dec 2011, 16:53
why arent you just writing 150+ instead of 150 - 900+?
▼
SIMOON 4 Dec 2011, 16:55
because it's "380 - 900+" !
Parent
▼
Gemb 4 Dec 2011, 17:08
no, you said 150 - 900+
Parent
▼
SIMOON 4 Dec 2011, 17:27
http://www.gamestv.org/faq/28-matchratings-explained-the-stars-unfolded/
Parent
▼
Gemb 4 Dec 2011, 17:28
Quoteexample rating :
Quote 0 - 15 viewers: 0 Stars
15 - 50 viewers: 1 Star
50 - 150 viewers: 2 Stars
150 - 900+ viewers: 3 Stars


??
Parent
▼
newbcake 4 Dec 2011, 17:40
0 - 20 viewers: 0 Stars
20 - 110 viewers: 1 Star
110 - 380 viewers: 2 Stars
380 - 900+ viewers: 3 Stars
Parent
▼
Gemb 4 Dec 2011, 20:09
I MEAN HIS EXAMPLE RATING, NOT THE ONE FROM GAMESTV. SO HARD TO CAPICHE?
Parent
▼
newbcake 4 Dec 2011, 20:10
YES HOMO it is.
Parent
▼
Homer 4 Dec 2011, 17:01
Dear Simoon

if you got some request/idea to GTV Staff, post it on GTV.

Regards

Homer
▼
SIMOON 4 Dec 2011, 17:11
Dear Homer,

Crossfire forums are more viewed than GTV forums.
GTV admin often read some Crossfire threads.
Here, we can have more feed back about these ideas.

Regards

SIMOON
Parent
▼
Homer 4 Dec 2011, 17:17
Dear Simoon

GTV admins always check GTV forums.
Your primary post looks like a letter for Santa Claus adressed to other person.
If you want more feedback, don't title your post as "Dear GTV" as it's pretty clear who the adresser is.

Regards

Homer
Parent
▼
Nub 4 Dec 2011, 17:18
use ticket
▼
FLExican 4 Dec 2011, 17:20
who cares
▼
s1LENT 4 Dec 2011, 17:33
not even sure what a difference 2 or 3 stars have :d I wouldnt care at all..
▼
SIMOON 4 Dec 2011, 17:41
the difference?
1 star bro !
Parent
▼
kartez 4 Dec 2011, 17:45
looks like you wanna reach 1 star level 8)
▼
m4rkus 4 Dec 2011, 17:58
But, Who actually cares about rating? It still good game if it would have 1 or 0 stars..
▼
ViKO 4 Dec 2011, 18:00
Update stats with #headshots :)
▼
embarrassed 4 Dec 2011, 21:38
It is three stars now, you nerds can relax.
Back to top