Cvar ot_distance = 6

by kloT • 11 May 2007, 10:18 • Forums › Cheaters
Neiter am I accusing anyone of anything nor am I raising an assertion without substance as I'm not really sure what cvar ot_distance = 6 is doing exactly.

Therefore I would like to question you, what you think about that.

Is it a valid proof for a cheat or could it be a sign that someone is using an external program (aimbot, whack, whatever).

What I found out so far is basically this:

- ot_ cvars are from a well known cheat and are used to toggle on and off various cheat features

- you can toggle ot_names, ot_distance, ot_weapons, ot_weaptxt, ot_teamesp, ot_teamtxt, ot_wallhack, ot_textesp, ot_logo, like a regular cvar (ot_names 1 turns on name esp) - thats direct from cheat readme (reffering to someone from pbbans.com)


Now it's your turn... and no, I don't want to ask perfo (whoever this is), keep your youtube links to yourself & if you reply to this first, we can all see that you made the 1. reply. thanx
Comments
43
▼
JOhn 11 May 2007, 11:20
Exactly
▼
kloT 11 May 2007, 11:22
quick reply guys but: what NO? and what EXACTLY? that doesn't help me at all :O(
Parent
▼
Domi 11 May 2007, 11:22
well u already said it yourself its used to toggle cheat commands on\\off so it must be part of a cheat : >
▼
Digitalnick 11 May 2007, 11:27
Or he uses a cheaters config :o
▼
Domi 11 May 2007, 11:29
idd .. Always check a config before using imo :) else ur just stupid,, and get shit like this :D
Parent
▼
Hope 11 May 2007, 11:29
Or he's retarded and puts some ot_cvar in his cfg without any effect
Parent
▼
Digitalnick 11 May 2007, 11:37
Even an idiot wouldn't do that, especially not in this period with all the cheater and cheaterbusters.
Parent
▼
kloT 11 May 2007, 11:29
yeah, but that would imply that he's not inevitably using an external program... in other words it is no valid proof... right?
Parent
▼
Digitalnick 11 May 2007, 11:36
It's not a valid proof, but first of all ask the person if he knows of crossfire.nu, if he doesn't, he didn't read this.
So you can ask him the question if he tested some configs.
If he sais no, then he's a cheater.
Parent
▼
kloT 11 May 2007, 11:41
rofl
the question was only in general but the guy I'm referring to has been accused of cheating (on xfire.be) a couple of times and he was replying: not my config, someone else's blablablubblub
Parent
▼
Digitalnick 11 May 2007, 11:43
I'm going to quote mens0, a well known cheatbuster;

" So he will excuse it with a shared config. Maybe sometimes it's true, but I am also sure most of these busts are caused by cheats."
Parent
▼
perforator 11 May 2007, 11:29
ask perfo (whoever this is) :D
▼
huumeantti 11 May 2007, 11:31
finally some1 that doesnt know you
Parent
▼
Domi 11 May 2007, 11:29
i think so ye.. why would u put such commands for fun in ur Config?
▼
Spree 11 May 2007, 11:32
ask perfo
▼
barney- 11 May 2007, 11:47
Ask rqmbo, he knows well the ot_ commands and stuff ;D
▼
rqmbo 11 May 2007, 12:00
Member For: 9 days

newbie plz
Parent
▼
barney- 11 May 2007, 12:12
http://www.yawn.be/findPlayer.yawn?nick=rqmbo&pbGuid=&etproGuid=&gamecode=ET

Niveau arguments bidons j'penses que t'es pr0 mais faut renouveler ;)
Parent
▼
Arachon 11 May 2007, 12:13
Member For: 1 year and 28 days

Banned from ESL plz
Parent
▼
chronos_ 11 May 2007, 12:18
T'en as pas marre de te repeter ? :`|
Parent
▼
Xo 11 May 2007, 14:02
EHEHIEHEIHEI NEWBIE HIEHEIHEIEHE RQMBO SAID NEWBIE OHNOEZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
Parent
▼
Deactivated5815 11 May 2007, 14:39
haha im Member For: 13 days
Parent
▼
rqmbo 11 May 2007, 14:42
but your sexy + your called Frank so np4u , but about him , look his retard nick Boumbo , please he should have aids or smth
Parent
▼
Deactivated5815 11 May 2007, 15:12
he should just lock himself in a room without inet
Parent
▼
rqmbo 11 May 2007, 15:14
so true
Parent
▼
nage 11 May 2007, 16:59
lolz, just checked ur guid at yawn :D wtf, ?! like 100 different pb guid & etpro guid =D I lold xD damn you :d
Parent
▼
virtu 11 May 2007, 12:21
Quote proof me wrong, but I am the only one who has been playing Castle Wolfenstein in all versions since it came out back in 1983 (Wolfenstein 2-D made by Muse SW)... :P
[/b]
lolololololololololololololololol
▼
kloT 11 May 2007, 12:26
honestly... that Apple II rocked
ever seen a 8" floppy drive?¿?
that's what I'm still dreaming of.
Parent
▼
virtu 11 May 2007, 13:11
I was just wodering how "oldschool" a guy can be?! :D
congratz :D
Parent
▼
kloT 11 May 2007, 13:31
well... I guess some of us never grow old :P
Parent
▼
Olly 11 May 2007, 12:40
I'm not sure but i think ot_distance determins how far ahead the wallhack should work. So the lower the number the closer you have to be to the person to see him through walls.
▼
HugTheSub 11 May 2007, 12:51
obviously he command is cheat. now its the question if there has only been a toggle of that command (leftover of cheaters-cfg maybe) or he rly used the hack. i dont think that is enough for a ban.
▼
kloT 11 May 2007, 13:21
unfortunately I agree with you.
Parent
▼
INSECURE 11 May 2007, 13:06
n1 english
▼
m00f 11 May 2007, 14:20
ot logo is in the config, its a cheat yes ,but some people are unaware of whats in there config since they have probably got the config from somewhere else, you dunno if he cheats or not, doesnt prove they cheat just means they had a cheat in there config, either knowing they had the cheat in there or they didnt.
▼
templario 11 May 2007, 15:21
i ve got warning for this stuff . Since this time i have never downloaded any cfg from net ;] btw u can do /cvar_list to check if ur cfg doesnt contain any pb violations .
▼
NzZ 11 May 2007, 16:23
wtf sjiiiiiiiz hoe vaak wordt jij wel niet gebanned:D
Back to top