* As already said we asked the 16 teamcaptains for their Top5. For an entry on #1 the team got 6 points - for a #2 place 5 points, #3 place 4 points and so on. Every not mentioned team got 1 point. Afterwards I divided the overall score by the number of teamcaptains (16) to get an average rating. A team could achieve 6 points maximum and 1 point minimum.
Top5 rating:
Masculine Mans | 5,13 |
EC Winners | 4,37 |
Team Celsus | 3,06 |
Bossid | 2,87 |
TAG | 2,06 |
Everybody set
Masculine Mans on one of the first positions. Just one captain predicted them on 5th place all others said they will be finishing the tournament on podium. So it will be interesting to see if they will be right after all!
And for all curious people a full list [urlnew=http://www.team-rockit.com/index/index.php?mod=scene&action=view&id=18]here[/url]
click on bottom the secret linkthing..and a lost with the next 5 teams will appear out of nowhere!
but nice coverup :)
GIVE ME NAME OF THAT FUCKER RIGHT NOW
RIGHT FUCKING NOW
Go MM <3
ze hebbe hun skills als genoeg beweze op lan en tijdens overload en team belgium toen, voor die cheat historie
iedereen was fanboy en nu worde ze uitgekakt elke keer da ze iets zegge me cheater :/
pls get brain
if you want just subtract all results - 1
It's a bit pedantic, but there is a slight difference between scores of 5.13 relative to 4.37 and 4.13 relative to 3.37. It's like if you went to an extreme of adding 95 to each score:
99.13 compared to 98.37 makes it looks like the results are closer than they actually are, even though the actual difference is the same as before.
I'm not trying to say you're method is wrong or stupid or anything, was just wondering if you had a particular reason for doing it