Whine about SLAC...
•
24 Jul 2010, 18:02
•
Journals
Why does (almost) everyone whine about SLAC?
All afraid of getting busted?
Backdoor?
"I won't use it since he will start selling cheats for SLAC after finishing it!"?
What the fuck is wrong with you all?
We have a new anticheat and noone wants to use it cuz someone coded it who also creates (or created) cheats?
Stupid cunts, srsly...
All thise whine about the creator...
Just in case hannes (or who ever) checks the code and stuff and says its safe, what will you do? Start playing with SLAC? I doubt that... you'll find other excuses to not use it (eg. They just didnt find the backdoor; It causes lags; Its already bypassed; blablabla)
I just dont understand all the whine/flame, just explain me why you dont want to use it?
All afraid of getting busted?
Backdoor?
"I won't use it since he will start selling cheats for SLAC after finishing it!"?
What the fuck is wrong with you all?
We have a new anticheat and noone wants to use it cuz someone coded it who also creates (or created) cheats?
Stupid cunts, srsly...
All thise whine about the creator...
Just in case hannes (or who ever) checks the code and stuff and says its safe, what will you do? Start playing with SLAC? I doubt that... you'll find other excuses to not use it (eg. They just didnt find the backdoor; It causes lags; Its already bypassed; blablabla)
I just dont understand all the whine/flame, just explain me why you dont want to use it?
lol ez money?
Stfu.
Just in case he rly does that (passwords and all that stuff) I'll sue Speedlink, np.
You just can win!
Anticheat with backdoor=money
Anticheat without backdoor=gaming with less cheaters
izi.
And yeah, it's possible to sue Speedlink for that (at least in Germany where Speedlink is registered)
And yeah, Speedlink is the offical publisher of that programm.
Publishing a programm/Application which contains phising or trojan stuff is punished quite hard.
If there is a backdoor in it (and you can proof it and stuff), they are publishing a virus/trojan which is illegal, you can sue them (because they are a registered company)
Easy.
Also I'm already loling hard at the people who say it's so easy to bypass, because silent detection doesn't tell them whether they were successful... we will see :)
Thank God there are still some people with brains in this community.
Well, like mentioned above:
If someone finds the backdoor in SLAC (After checking the code) its possible, ofc you cant just say "Oh yeah, my computer got fucked by a trojan/virus it must have been SLAC" but I guess everyone can think that far
Anyhoo, it's ridiculous that we talk about lawyers anyway. My major concern is that it is made by a guy who has been known to create hacks and malware. Hence it is not weird that people are questioning/whining if the program is safe to use. Just get a trustworthy third party to verify and control the program before enforcing it. But i guess that is too much to ask for these days?
If you would take your head out of your ass you would understand someone who has been known for these activities in the past might not be the best person to trust for creating a anticheat. Since you seem to have an advanced expertise in industry experience i hope you understand the basics of accountancy aswell. These also apply to this anticheat. An independend company should investigate the source code, verify it and after control it by hosting it on their website. credibility problem solved :)
Crying that 90% of the community cheats (when 5% is a more accurate guess), but when there's an anticheat out there that is made by someone subject to a legal binding contract they start crying about so-called backdoors that would be implanted. He's bound by contract, he can't do that dipshits.
Funniest of all, most of those who cry are ex-cheaters themselves.
This game is rotten to an extreme you wont believe.
Anyone playing this game knows that percentage is nowhere near the truth. That is a percentage for a payed game like the COD series.
I would say easily 30% or 40% is cheating.
who guarantees that he didnt put a backdoor in the software and phishes all your passwords and stuff.
it's fine with me if you guys wanna play with that software, personally i will never install it.
So dont download any freeware stuff from Chip (eg. "Put all my movies in a folder which is labeled with the movies name"-Programm)
Even big companys are doing that (Apple)
Please...He's bound by a legal contract + being paid a shit load. Why would he risk getting prosecuted and losing a lot more than he would earn just to help out cheaters?
He doesn't prefer cheaters over non-cheaters anyway, he's just doing whatever he does for money.
If he codes more cheats or creates a backdoor or w/e, he'll lose money and a lot of it ...
Do you even know what a legal contract is?
He can't install a backdoor or he'll get prosecuted by speedlink and get sued for more money than they gave him.
I know you're scared of getting busted, but it's your own fault so gtfo.
Have fun using bots, we'll talk in 2 months.
My antivirus also picked it up as being a trojan, but it did the same for PB.
It's because heuretic scanning... It's a crypted file so your antivirus thinks it's suspicious.
All of this is in the readme file.
in general, im really suspicious about programs that i install on my computer and that worked for me pretty well so far.
He didn't change his mind, he's always been his way.
He doesn't care who cheats and who not, he does not care who he works for, as long as he gets money.
SL offers more money than coding cheats ever would and thanks to the contract he can't fuck us over or he'd get fucked twice as hard.
Good luck winning against cheaters.
When it's done and you want to play in a league you'll have to use it, so it's like it or lump it really.
They're just raging.
wtf
e: "D:"
- on paper
- New PC (same or better specs)
- money for lost data
- A big "Sorry that we were that stupid, we will never do it again..." as apoligize
If SL is that sure it's safe etc, they are able to do this, if it's good no pc will die because of this SLAC right?
If SL isn't doing it: they are not sure theirselfs about it... so it would say enough about the trust in it;)
and if it's working is a 2nd thing:)
they should give us good reason to use and trust it... and chap isn't rly with such background helping here...
If you want to play, use it otherwise fuck off.
Fight fire with fire.
You seem to be rather retarded, you're probably a cheater.
Noone heres give a shit about people like you...
The clean players are behind SLAC because they're not afraid of getting busted, those that are whining and flaming are probably those that have a reason to be scared.
Use slac and you won't have to play against cheaters anymore in due time...
SLAC = radical
Amount of cheaters = radical
That's fire with fire
Both using cheats is just being retarded, that would more suite 'levelling the player field'
He can't fuck us over because that would be worse for him than it would for us...
So, in summary, if he fucks us over, he ends up 50 times worse than he is now? He'd lose the money he gains from SLAC and probably a lot more as well... Not to mention, risk a juridical punishment for breaking a contract AND stealing private data.
Only a retard would do that and we all know that he is not a retard.
e: but i do get your point, don't understand me wrong... but I can also understand why ppl are not being pretty fond of the idea.
Please...
There is probably at least one, if not more coders that Speedlink contacts that are at about the same level of Chapjla if not higher and they check the code before he releases it.
There's no way SL would risk malicious software to be published under their name with so much money on the table and their reputation at stake.
We aren't dealing with a band of coders picked up from the community, we're dealing with a professional company which hired a coder with a contract.
I don't see how so many people fail to understand the essential difference between those 2.
Noone ever whined about pnkbstra and pnkbstrb scanning your entire HD, memory and processes, yet they're already whining about SLAC without even knowing if there's something suspicious about it.
Oh well, I guess I shouldn't expect this much from this community
no reason to talk with you any further since you are a bit too closed minded it seems, have a nice day and hf buying new pc in 2 weeks ;)
You seem to be unaware what a contract is and what the penalties are for breaking it...
Idiot.
I am kinda looking for a statement of speedlink concerning the confidentiality of this tool, else I won't play any competition anymore
yo new imba slac is working gtfo cheaters!
(hope so)
I dont whine about slac ^^
1/ I don't really play ET anymore
2/ There isn't any linux client atm
E: Is CB already forcing the beta or are they going to force the "real" release?
I haven't really checked, but they started using the cheat detection tool that was going to be used by antipro when it was in beta as well :)
I guess we'll see :P
i don't know if it's true atm but how is it possible that another fintard can play on SLAC server with the same level he got before getting busted for multihax etc :D Maybe he just found one of the many ways :D
And as for that fintard on SLAC server, awfully lots of these multihack busts are from public and the busted person has actually never cheated in matches.
Double busts, double paid.