#revive.6on6
•
4 Jan 2011, 01:18
•
Journals
Seeing as there is so much talk about bringing 6on6 back because it is better. I have spent a bit of time setting a quick cup up for you guys to show that 6on6 is still much better then 5on5!
Cup page @ http://www.crossfire.nu/?x=cups&mode=item&id=75
IRC: #revive.6on6
Note: this is only for a laugh and i'm hoping to see some teams really try signup!
Thanks!
Cup page @ http://www.crossfire.nu/?x=cups&mode=item&id=75
IRC: #revive.6on6
Note: this is only for a laugh and i'm hoping to see some teams really try signup!
Thanks!
e: And noticing 7 years after the game was released that the format has to be changed just cause its easier to organize LANs is imo hilarious.
but with more eyes on et we get more ppl talented in other than just playing good, we must remember that movie makers for example is attracting a big amount of players
We share same thoughts!
ps. not that it matters, but ive adapted to 5v5, it just happens to be boring and dull. I know you like it, but I dont.
"ET running alongside cod4 is great advertisement."
I have to be honest now: I don't really give a fuck, no offense.
that's what I was thinking when we joined TLR for cdc4, but the truth was something totally different. nowadays i'm at least extremely sceptic about support and already for some time when we've joined mgcs who promise things I've expected absolutely nothing. if things happen to be different now, there's absolutely no bitterness, i'm happy for it. will be seeing how things really go when the next lan is.
WHAT? :D
If you don't want to take part thats fine!
basicly im always up for helping, but atm i just dont wanna promise help which i cant provide cuz of my free time.
only 8 teams or so got some decent support, so it would only benefit them :P
infact if theres any extra help you need for the UK lan or anything else, let me know!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upaJHS8mfP8&NR
:{D
but in a way its funny, usually its those people who never adapted to 6v6 and now when they found a nobrain format, they want to stick to it. :)
I like to play because the game is fun and competive.
This is just a quick cup that will last 2 weeks and I hope people have a laugh when playing!
and no, my comment wasnt pointed at you, I was talking about 5v5.
Note this is defiantly NOT a personal attack. I just wish that some people who do enjoy playing ET and want to see if do well give 5on5 more of a chance. It is fun to play... its deffo still ET and NOT CampOrDie4
There was only cod and et at aef afaik :)
6on6 is dead and I am afraid this cup is as close to alive as it will ever be. I just missed a few aspects of 6on6 which is why I wanted to bring it back for these 2 weeks.
Therefore I think people should respect his word because he knows what he is talking about. Me and him have just had a discussion on ventrilo about the current situation in ET and I think we are both at an agreement now that regardless of how successful this cup is ET is remaining 5on5 format. I just say people will have to get on an enjoy ET while you can because it only has a few years left in it!
Would CB / ESL really care if clans just started to play 6on6 ie. in 5on5 ladder?
I also prefer it that you set a time on pretty much every map when the teams are fairly even.
Whilst in 6on6, there was alot more fullholds and longer defences as I remember it.
I dnt think the gap between, 5on5 and 6on6 is enough to be like " I WONT PLAY ET ANYMORE COS THERE IS ONE LESS PLAYER PER TEAM".
People who want to play the games actively still are, I don't think the format has stopped many people playing.
But I have no problem with ppl playing nostalgic 6on6 cups, since i would probably play RTCW instead of ET if there was like 20 teams or something.
(waiting for my movie to download, thats the only reason im debating to pass the time :D)
go on #6on6.et
- profit ??
*edit* and stop using the "lans" arguement! on the one hand you say 5on5 is better for lans since it takes less pc's and space and on the other hand you say that 5on5 attracts much more teams than 6on6 which results in requiering much more space and pc's. doesnt make sense to me somehow ^^.
Though I am not going to start an argument saying I would prefer ET without LANs because actually they are a good laugh to go to wether your playing or not.
RTCW do it every so often so therefore ET should try do the same for 6on6.
Sure 5on5 makes it easier to organise and u get more teams, but its just bullshit that it would be impossible to get it in 6on6 mode. Anyone who says otherwise is pretty much an idiot or doesnt have any clue how to organise anything
As it has also been done before^^
- 5on5 made the game more dull and repetitive. I never see innovating tactics anymore, while when we were playing 6on6 you could actually get surprised by other teams.
-Semi-contradicting myself here but 5on5 also made the game more random. If player A presses his selfkill button a millisecond too late the entire defence is most likely gone. This simple "missing one player = trouble-fact" has made ET more luckbased than it used to be. Sometimes a lesser skilled team can beat a more skilled team due to this, and unlike the surpises we saw "back in the day" these upsets have nothing do to with skill.
- 5on5 made the field ops a walking ammo cabinet, I dislike this because I used to main this class but I'm sure more people agree that this is a negative change.
- 5on5 made the game more linear, this argument might sound the same like the previous ones but I'm talking about something specific : The unexpected-factor. You're not allowed to go covert ops anymore, to then hide an entire minute, just to take out their command post on radar. You're not allowed to search the spawnkill as a field ops anymore because you'd be abandoning your team. ( Etc .. )
I know quite a lot of "oldschool" people, including myself, who quit playing because ET became terrible with the change. I hate 5on5.
Iron & decem approve of this comment.
Cba to photoshop/paint it tho :P
u just mad when u lose mixes and ban people.
and i didnt like the spam in 6o6 :)
my comment is prob invalid as i think 3o3 > 5o5 > 6o6 > 4o4 > 2o2 > 1o1!
:s
All in all I''d love to see 6on6 back, LAN's (except for CC's) can still be held 5on5 I don't really mind that.
panzer deciding the game or stage
airstrike or artillery deciding the game or stage
Most teams think like this now, what if it goes wrong ill get full and defence is gone.
So no more risk is less fun. Not only for the spectators, but also for the players that like to play those classes.
And the lan argument is invalid, look at the top teams playing its a small percentage. Why should everyone just follow a few top teams that want to play lan. And i don´t think it will effect the community that much, i think the joy of playing is more important and thats why i think 6on6 will make the community stronger.