busted ?

by Connor • 3 Feb 2011, 15:57 • Journals
karmazynowy (00011412)



http://sl-anticheat.com/screenshot.php?id=59833
http://sl-anticheat.com/screenshot.php?id=60246




yes ? :d
Comments
24
▼
Robert 3 Feb 2011, 15:58
vid_restart bug
▼
mana 3 Feb 2011, 15:59
rofl :DDD seriously, i understand what SLAC does but still, fucking retarded that hackers can own servers with old hacks coolface np on :DDD

And yes, THEY WILL BE BANT CUZ SILENT DETECTONN. But how easy it is to make a new slac account?
▼
chaplja 3 Feb 2011, 16:02
in most cases not as easy as you think.. many people can't login regardless whether their new accounts are banned or not
Parent
▼
unblind 3 Feb 2011, 16:07
well now the idea of silent detection is:

first detection of the hack

log any detected users of the hack but don't ban them for x time

ban all the people who got caught in period x, from now on ban for this hack as soon as its detected

not: detect cheater never ban
Parent
▼
firzen 3 Feb 2011, 16:07
"Anti-cheat status: OK"

but...but...hack cannot into slac?
▼
GreenClon 3 Feb 2011, 16:07
I dont see anything exceptional?
▼
koop 3 Feb 2011, 16:08
first hacking screenshot ive seen from slac !
▼
naco 3 Feb 2011, 16:27
epic :D
▼
b4lu 3 Feb 2011, 16:50
wonder why he still sux
▼
WAr 3 Feb 2011, 16:52
nothink obviously
▼
k1tT 3 Feb 2011, 16:52
amazing photoshop skilz i see....
▼
1Fach1Genie 3 Feb 2011, 16:56
Anti-cheat status: OK so he' s clean gtfo
▼
kartez 3 Feb 2011, 17:24
just high sens, dont worry
▼
SjMX 3 Feb 2011, 17:45
lol why is he not banned yet?
▼
Tites 3 Feb 2011, 18:03
slac id above 10.000 = hax
▼
sonaR 3 Feb 2011, 18:09
fortunately mine is around 9000 :{D
Parent
▼
xiN 3 Feb 2011, 18:59
Phase 1: Report this user
Phase 2: ?
Phase 3: Profit!
▼
samraj 3 Feb 2011, 19:13
http://sl-anticheat.com/screenshot.php?id=60235

is this green helmet a joke ?? or really so shit this wh
▼
dudee 3 Feb 2011, 19:19
69ers Hook :)
Back to top