Imo he's simulating hard, like in plenty of other matches. He was like he couldn't walk anymore at the beginning of the 5th set, and like 1 game after this, he's running in every fucking corner, hitting the ball with much more intensity and aaccuracy and encouraging himself after rough rallies.
Lol Djokovic isn't simulating. He is honest, how dare you throwing such accusations only because you '"feel like" he is faking things? He fucking played for almost 5 hours iirc two days ago, is it not normal to feel injured at some point? If he had not and had won instead, u'd have said : he is inhuman, he must be using dope. fuck off
oh yeah i forgot to add, he's obviously using dope :)
Trust me, it's _IMPOSSIBLE_ to play at such a level when you're playing 2 matches during > 5hours both. Talking about it cause i know it. I'm used to see, and even to play very long matches ( > 2h30 - 3h ), it's just impossible to not having any cramps or a pain somewhere.
And don't get me wrong, i'm absolutly not talking about his abilities to play tennis at this level. He's a really good player, no doubt about it, he's just recieving some help from externals products..
i simply called you a tard because you think a professional sportsman like him, is on some sort of physical enhancement, it was a retarded non argumental statement to make when obviously he is just well conditioned, you only whine about the insult coz u kno im right, you want a civilized conversation then how about writing something worth arguing about :) sry for calling you a tard, i should of said it was a retarded comment, better? :)
Ok, so you admit he did not fake it. good point.
And I agree with you,playing at such a level isn't human. They are both probably doped and providing an extreme quality show. I don't ask for more (I know that's a weak argument tho)
WoW that is one of the most retarded things i have ever read on this website. Also the dope statement? :DDDDDDDD. You could physically see him cramping up and in pain when serving and switching speeds, he is known for finding energy from nowhere. Maybe you should google adrenaline. Just look how both couldnt stand when those presidential faggots where giving their speech about how great australia tennis is, they had to get them both chairs because they were both leaning on the net.
How you can put a negative spin on one of the best matches ever and 2 of the best players ever is beyond me.
Don't act like you got any clue about the actual tennis lol.
Read my previous comment before replying, really. I _NEVER_ said he was a bad player or anything, i'm the first one admitting he's a really great player.
:D? what? where did you find this? He's actually known for simulating in important moments, you can do researches or what ever you want, you'll find out that what i'm saying is true.
This show today was truely amazing, I, like many others viewers and spectators were exciting while watching this match, Nadal deserved this win more than Djokovic.
EVERY player on that level uses some external products, don't put it on djokovic.
You may or may not know a lot about tennis, but your first statement is idiotic and ignorant.
If you can't see that, discussion is useless.
i had him over the drug issue, what a total retarded comment made by him, made me laugh even, how can a top sportsman be doping when they get tested before every major tournament, tards are just tards dude lol :D
Ye, the ending was thrilling :) Although Novak could end it 6:4 when he had chance in game 9 in 4th set, leading 40:0 while Nadal was serving. And, well, he fucked up :D
You should not judge a player's quality by the length of the rallies and his strength, this is pure bullshit, it's like a girl falling in love with the most muscled guy...
Federer has obviously a PSYCHOLOGICAL problem against Nadal. He was on a 25-30 matches winning streak before that. Federer is the best because he creates. He does not try to steamroll his opponents.
So because he lost in the semi's this year makes him not the best ever...while both nadal and djoko both lost semi's before too. Sense? this makes none!
yeah age indeed, can't remember Federer in the mid 2000's? I think he still holds the record in consecutive matches won. (280-something I think) He was simply unbeatable.
Federer is the all-time #1 because he can still in his 30's be in the top 3 of men's tennis. He relys mostly on his technique when he plays, unlike Nadal especially relys on extremely good physics (reason why he's almost unbeatable on clay).
summary RF is awesome and there's nothing you can do about it!
he can easily be now, yes, but what about when he was 24-25? That's a tennis player's best age, not 30. Saw Ivan Lendl, Pete Sampras, Jimmy Connors being top 1 when they retired? no.
And neither will you see Djokovic or Nadal being the rank #1 when they're thirty. Nadal already dropped behind Djokovic and the same will happen to Djokovic when the time comes.
He didnt have a proper opponents in his prime, thus he won shitload of grandslams... But then wild Nadal appear, and suddenly he started to struggle in every match against him. Now when hes old, hes no match for Novak and Rafa...
Wtf Federer rolled Nadal with a 6-0 at the end of the last year, he owned Djokovic at Roland-Garros and lost to him last year too in New York simply because Djokovic stroke one fabulous return in the 5th. And he does not match with them?.....
But still an epic match.
Epic match.
I still fucking hate this djokovic fag, fucking actor simulating injuries.
Nadal fucking deserved this match
Me mad.
Epic match tho.
Hate this fag.
Trust me, it's _IMPOSSIBLE_ to play at such a level when you're playing 2 matches during > 5hours both. Talking about it cause i know it. I'm used to see, and even to play very long matches ( > 2h30 - 3h ), it's just impossible to not having any cramps or a pain somewhere.
We can debate for hours if you want, but no point arguing with people like you ^^
Ok, so you admit he did not fake it. good point.
And I agree with you,playing at such a level isn't human. They are both probably doped and providing an extreme quality show. I don't ask for more (I know that's a weak argument tho)
How you can put a negative spin on one of the best matches ever and 2 of the best players ever is beyond me.
Grats to Djokovic.
Read my previous comment before replying, really. I _NEVER_ said he was a bad player or anything, i'm the first one admitting he's a really great player.
:D? what? where did you find this? He's actually known for simulating in important moments, you can do researches or what ever you want, you'll find out that what i'm saying is true.
This show today was truely amazing, I, like many others viewers and spectators were exciting while watching this match, Nadal deserved this win more than Djokovic.
And yes, he's obviously using dope
You may or may not know a lot about tennis, but your first statement is idiotic and ignorant.
If you can't see that, discussion is useless.
nvm just saw @ profile that ur Nadal fan.
So this would make a just a blind fan :) too bad, more luck next time I guess.
Wait, there were 3 people in this final? I didnt see Federer at all :o
then the last set of the final
Nadal was winning but it looked like Nadal snapped when he missed that open shot
Ppl say Federer is best tennis player ever...
Thats bullshit, just watch how unhuman Nadal and Djokovic are... 6th hour of match and they do longest ball exchange of game.
Hope they will play more, cause even if i dislike Nadal, they always provide us with quality matches!
Apparently strenght is more important in nowadays tennis than technique skills...
I guess streamrolling is better way of playing, after all... he lost to Nadal
Nadal > Federer
Djoko > Nadal
Still RF is the best technician & genius in tennis :)
So because he lost in the semi's this year makes him not the best ever...while both nadal and djoko both lost semi's before too. Sense? this makes none!
during last year, how many grandslam finals he were in? ONE?
great results for best player ever...
Career prize money $67,479,965
Career titles 70 (ATP World Tour and Grand Slam)
22 Grand Slam titles
Nadal:
Career prize money $45,114,407
Career titles 46
10 Grand Slam titles
Djokovic
Career prize mone $32,882,760
Career titles 29
8 Grand Slam titles
numbers dont lie :C
no wonder guy whos 35 yo got more titles than 24 yo serbian dominator....
Federer is the all-time #1 because he can still in his 30's be in the top 3 of men's tennis. He relys mostly on his technique when he plays, unlike Nadal especially relys on extremely good physics (reason why he's almost unbeatable on clay).
summary RF is awesome and there's nothing you can do about it!
ps. Djokovic is awesome as well.
Nadal. well not so much.
but hes not best player ever, as many see him... exactly because he can "easly" be overpowered...
And neither will you see Djokovic or Nadal being the rank #1 when they're thirty. Nadal already dropped behind Djokovic and the same will happen to Djokovic when the time comes.
Apparently strenght is more important in nowadays tennis than technique skills...
He didnt have a proper opponents in his prime, thus he won shitload of grandslams... But then wild Nadal appear, and suddenly he started to struggle in every match against him. Now when hes old, hes no match for Novak and Rafa...
There is something really wrong with you my friend.
Meaning, men dont have
Maria lols @ Karolina