The mobile again

by butchji • 25 May 2007, 12:04 • Journals
Stolen from a post by Spirea:

"I have said this earlier but I will say it again. Mg isn't the problem, the Problem is that MG doesN'T have damage falloff... so basically, the further u deploy the mg the more effective it is"

I think this would be a good compromise - using damage falloff but don't remove the gun since it's impossible on far distances on radar for example to compete with the mobile.
Comments
29
▼
s3ref 25 May 2007, 13:05
first

[ironie] maybe we should do damage falloff for panzer? [/ironie]
▼
Deactivated5815 25 May 2007, 13:07
so true
me wants longrangerockets
Parent
▼
eXoz 25 May 2007, 13:09
me wants RPG with remote controle
Parent
▼
jackoff 25 May 2007, 13:08
What the fuck you care.
▼
tALi 25 May 2007, 13:10
hör doch mal auf rummzuheulen.
genau der selbe scheiss wie das mit der rifle...
▼
Decade 25 May 2007, 13:15
Hmm but then the mg would be less useful, and it's already rarely used
▼
head 25 May 2007, 13:18
Klingt vernünftig.
▼
tALi 25 May 2007, 13:23
du spielst eh nicht mehr, du hast mal garnix zu melden :C
Parent
▼
HellKn1ght 25 May 2007, 13:27
Ich freu mich schon auf die selben Diskussionen in ET:QW :DDD
▼
m!das 25 May 2007, 13:31
aber erst nach einem jahr spielen ohne das jemand was stört :o

bzw nach 10 bugfixes :D
Parent
▼
conan 25 May 2007, 14:36
nur durch sowas kann sich ein spiel entwickeln. Wäre ET so wie es am Anfang wäre, würde es, imo, nicht soo viele Turniere lans geben (spam würde dominieren etc.).
Parent
▼
HellKn1ght 25 May 2007, 18:03
Ja, natürlich helfen sie dem Gameplay, das ist auch gut so. Langweilig sind sie trotzdem. Imo muss man QW sehr sehr stark "verkrüppeln", damit es gut spielbar wird.
Parent
▼
eVo 25 May 2007, 13:31
would be a reasonable compromise, i would hate to see maps like Bremen spoilt because of the MG being too powerful
▼
Fizmo 25 May 2007, 14:01
that r one the few, rare moments where every1 is waiting for!! (except for the players of the opposing team)
Parent
▼
m!das 25 May 2007, 13:32
remove damagefalloff @smg would be better tbH
▼
TosspoT 25 May 2007, 13:41
Interesting concept, is it something thats arleady an option in etpro? Or would it need someone to make changes
▼
wipeout 25 May 2007, 14:32
It would need someone to make changes.
Parent
▼
moutoul 25 May 2007, 13:44
I am not quite sure, but due to the mg-42 heavy rate of fire, even with damage falloff it would mow you down in a couple of seconds.

Let s add the possibility to make headshots with it and no heating, just for fun ;)
▼
snuble 25 May 2007, 13:52
i think we should just remove it tbh:<<
▼
Vanhaomena 25 May 2007, 14:04
Damage falloff for Mortar, too!

"due to the mg-42 heavy rate of fire, even with damage falloff it would mow you down in a couple of seconds."

No it wouldn't, if the damage falloff makes it damage go to 0. FFS
▼
Reb 25 May 2007, 14:22
get a life
▼
jackoff 25 May 2007, 14:30
I do second that.
Parent
▼
conan 25 May 2007, 14:34
agreed, still, removing it completely is better =D
▼
pred 25 May 2007, 14:39
maybe pro5 should get banz0red. :o(
Back to top