The last resort :X
•
1 Nov 2007, 15:58
•
Journals
yeah lunatic again. Bulld0g just confirmed.
http://www.gamestv.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=1528
;x
http://www.gamestv.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=1528
;x
=/
same as having a gun in your house doesn't proof you used it.
im btw not defending him, im just stating that a file-mismatch isn't proof someone hacked.
but given that he probably knew he downloaded the hack...
Im pretty sure he DID know
getting busted twice by the same thing isnt just coincidence
You mean that he just left nexus cheat cfg or a cheat.pk3 in his et folder and he didnt mean to use it right?
How did it ever get on his PC?
You said its a "pointer"
well this "points" to him having used it
so stop defending him, you just look like an asshole arguing with everybody
He was busted a while back for nexus. If you know some of lunatic's history you would know with quite some certainty that he used nexus a long time ago for the fuck of it since he had already quite competition gaming. The reason why this MD5 mismatch popped up is most likely cuz a file (in this case nex_settings.src) was found in his ET folder.
Go ahead, I dare you to try it. Ask him for the file and put it in your ET folder. It won't do anything but sit there, but you will be banned for it cuz a file with a certain name and md5 checksum is found in your ET folder.
It proofs that there is a file, nothing more nothing less.
you cannot say that just cause he possibly didnt load a hack that he isnt guilty. He is per definition a cheater, since he downloaded this file which is only used for CHEATING
so you might say it DOESNT prove he actually cheated this time
but he did have it in his ET folder and given that he already has been busted once for the same hax
I wouldnt make this journal a place to prove a point of , guilt by association.
Truth is that every other player would get completely hammered for something like this, but just cause its a guy who's been around for a long time and is viewed as a "star" people like you will do your best to try and persuade the rest of us that HE is different from the rest.
where did I say that you were wrong in saying that md5tool check in itself doesnt prove someone hacked?
all I ever said was that this goes way beyond what you implied in your first comment...
FUCKING ROFL, omg.. in your very first reply to me!
^^ duh..
it is proof
But what I meant is that it proves a series of events .
Every person with an IQ over 100 would tell you that ONE isolated event cannot prove a damned thing
and I know that as well
but you said it wasnt proof, when it infact proves SOMETHING
"where did I say that you were wrong in saying that md5tool check in itself doesnt prove someone hacked?"
md5tool check in itself, meaning that single isolated event , not connected to anything else is obviously NOT proof of anything
I hope you get what Im saying, I think it was just a misunderstanding of words...
understand me correct as well, I'm not here to defend cheaters cuz i fucking hate cheaters. im just saying it isn't a correct way with which you can say for certain that someone hacked or not.
I don't think that anyone can have a proper reason for having some files, which surely belong to some hack, on his ET folder ("my dog or grandma must've installed it on my computer" ain't a proper reason)
im still clean..
i agree!