yes, try to make it less suitable for rambo's.
ET is a nice game cuz u can be a good player on different aspects of the game, the changes ur promoting would only benefit the "rambo" kind.
why... without 4 nades engies are even more fragile... supply defense for example... lets say you have 1 eng 2 fop 2 med... both of those medics have to play smart, neither can rambo
5v5 makes it so you can't have 3 random medics running around, they actually have to have more of a brain and use more teamwork, that or you sacrifice a field op, which is sacrificing spam
5on5 makes teamplay a lot more essential... you can't have one rambo medic running around doing nothing with the team, medics have to play a lot smarter and it makes the game a little more brain based than aim based
obviously... i can see why you would be opposed to making the game require more intelligence
3-3 > 5-5 > 2-2 > 6-6 > 1-1
what's not to make sense?
i wish it was possible to nerf rifle chargetime while not nerfing engies :|
ET is a nice game cuz u can be a good player on different aspects of the game, the changes ur promoting would only benefit the "rambo" kind.
you cant go rambo in 5v5... if a medic goes rambo the rest of the team is going to get fucked over
Eng is almost non usefull anymore - (except the mines, which will be much harder to plant without the additional extra spam u had)
2 fops ( in 6v6 yea.)
2 medics ( u need the extra hp + extra medic)
neds more spam and teamwork
5v5 makes it so you can't have 3 random medics running around, they actually have to have more of a brain and use more teamwork, that or you sacrifice a field op, which is sacrificing spam
+1
SO PLS GET THE FUCK OFF!
well, ok. 3on3 sucks even more. forgive me my mistake.
obviously... i can see why you would be opposed to making the game require more intelligence
DEL THIS NOOB JOURNAL!