5ON5 LOL?

by Hing • 20 Jan 2010, 19:10 • Journals
Imho it fucking sucks, what do you guys think ?
Comments
24
▼
promen 20 Jan 2010, 19:10
challanged you
▼
nAbio 20 Jan 2010, 19:11
It's muy bien :)
▼
johNny_ 20 Jan 2010, 19:11
yes it does
▼
artyoM 20 Jan 2010, 19:11
its ok but 6on6 was better
▼
vimm 20 Jan 2010, 19:11
#5on5.is.shit @ quakenet :)
▼
sCope 20 Jan 2010, 20:24
vimm is genius !
Parent
▼
Seanza 20 Jan 2010, 19:13
Created the challange.

We pick braun.
▼
Nub 20 Jan 2010, 19:14
i lyk :)))))))))))
▼
Kevji 20 Jan 2010, 19:14
5o5 > 6o6
▼
Stouda 20 Jan 2010, 19:22
5on5 sucks less spam and stuff so hail 6on6
▼
Gifted 20 Jan 2010, 19:35
its niceeee
▼
RiZkKk 20 Jan 2010, 19:54
its good
▼
risee 20 Jan 2010, 20:08
i would prolly prefer it if i was still active.
▼
Spirea 20 Jan 2010, 20:09
better than 6on6

although 6on6 with less spam would be best
▼
Snatch 20 Jan 2010, 20:14
its better cos u dont have to find 6 players
▼
GoodGuyGary 20 Jan 2010, 20:25
5on5 only needs some few tweaking,

power fops, more spam
decrease rifle power
cap medic health
▼
crook 20 Jan 2010, 20:41
+1, allthough if you are going to tune down medic health you might empower the same spam that needs nerfing.
Parent
▼
sCope 20 Jan 2010, 20:27
ET = CS NOW
▼
number1dad 20 Jan 2010, 21:35
It needs some work but I think it's better for this game at this point in time. Not only is it easier to get 5 people on to practice, it's also more exciting to watch now because 6v6 strats have become stale, it's nice to see teams have to adapt.
Back to top