xx_attack edited

by Atreyu • 20 Aug 2008, 13:53 • Forums › Cheaters
euh, never busted someone or never read a bust topic thingy,
but if someone gets kicked for pb "cvar xx_attack = +attack;-attack"

can u bust someone for that?

if so, I'll edit post with screenshot & his yawn nd stuff..

no flame for my lack of knowledge plox :<

8f76d8a2e30dedb22cc3ea3a24533b35209e679b is his guid

http://i271.photobucket.com/albums/jj139/DeBruyneJeroen/shot0001.jpg
screeny of his kick
Comments
65
▼
baMs 20 Aug 2008, 14:55
lolo 1st
▼
w0nd3r 20 Aug 2008, 14:56
no, report it to pbbans, they will remove the ban
▼
Atreyu 20 Aug 2008, 14:59
he was only kicked for 6 mins
Parent
▼
w0nd3r 20 Aug 2008, 15:00
gief link to the ban
Parent
▼
Deactivated2373 20 Aug 2008, 14:56
yes u can bust him with it.
▼
Atreyu 20 Aug 2008, 14:58
sarcasm or not ?
Parent
▼
edison 20 Aug 2008, 14:57
i wonder that u or anyone got banned for that that looks like a regular script
▼
Quazz 20 Aug 2008, 15:01
its a script for bots rofl
Parent
▼
edison 20 Aug 2008, 15:09
regular strafescript for lowbirds

bind mouse1 "+vstr foo bar"
set foo "+attack ; +sprint"
set bar "-attack ; -sprint"

bind mouse1 "+vstr xx_attack xx_attackk"
set xx_attack "+attack ; +sprint"
set xx_attackk "-attack ; -sprint"

DONT TRY THIS AT HOME
And i wont try myself after reading this journal.

But if you Really get kicked for that...
Parent
▼
Quazz 20 Aug 2008, 15:14
you can get banned for it on cb
Parent
▼
Ronner 20 Aug 2008, 15:18
no you can't. did you even read what script edison posted?
Parent
▼
Yossarian 20 Aug 2008, 15:26
#unban.senti.gnajda innocently banned for lowbird strafescript <3
Parent
▼
Ronner 20 Aug 2008, 15:28
wut? what the fuck does a strafe-script have to do with their bans.
Parent
▼
YEOJ 20 Aug 2008, 15:36
Senti got bannend for the exact same cvar:

cvar xx_attack = +attack;-attack"
cvar xx_reload = +reload;-reload"

and gnadja got kicked for that cvar asswell.
Parent
▼
Ronner 20 Aug 2008, 16:02
can you point me to senti's CB ban? I fail to find it on that site which has fail-navigation.
Parent
▼
YEOJ 20 Aug 2008, 17:37
1sec let me find it for u


http://www.pbbans.com/mbi-viewban-664006a2-vb81667.html


->PBSV: [From #3 06a2(?) ^6R^0eMi^6X ^0seNthai] k$_attack = "+attack;-attack"









It's not xx_attack, but its the same cvar, different hack. IF im not mistaken
Parent
▼
Ronner 20 Aug 2008, 17:52
bulld0g explained it to me. There is a difference between a CVAR and a value being done with SET
Parent
▼
edison 20 Aug 2008, 15:39
i actually meant if someone accidentaly now names his script cvars starting with "xx_" & as second "xy_" gets a pb+cb ban.. i mean if he got kicked for "xx_attack" the player has no chance to prove it was a script, *not a bot .
Parent
▼
Kiewan 20 Aug 2008, 15:47
"cvar xx_attack = +attack;-attack"

image: idiot-41423
Parent
▼
edison 20 Aug 2008, 15:53
okay true thats pretty senseless, i hope he only got kicked for exact that cmd, getting banned for any xx_cvars is kinda new to me


that picture is a fake btw
Parent
▼
Kiewan 20 Aug 2008, 15:55
omg its about the ''=''
Parent
▼
edison 20 Aug 2008, 15:57
omg thats PB trying to tell why he got kicked

no cfg commands/scripts/binds start with "CVAR" they start with seta,set or cmd etc.
Parent
▼
Kiewan 20 Aug 2008, 16:00
fucking idiot
Parent
▼
edison 20 Aug 2008, 16:04
warningpoints plz :P
Parent
▼
YEOJ 20 Aug 2008, 17:38
kiewan is talking about this


cvar xx_attack= +attack;-attack


the = is part of the cvar command.
Parent
▼
edison 20 Aug 2008, 19:15
u both dont understand what i mean, nvm
Parent
▼
Quazz 20 Aug 2008, 15:48
rofl
Parent
▼
Ronner 20 Aug 2008, 16:03
what is rofl about it.
Parent
▼
Quazz 20 Aug 2008, 16:06
maybe you should take a closer look at the script

it says xx_attack in it and ppl get kicked by pb for it and banned on cb
Parent
▼
EURUZZz 20 Aug 2008, 18:16
so they are dumbasses then
make the xx_attack -> attack1 eg it's their fucking problem that they use such script
Parent
▼
Quazz 20 Aug 2008, 18:33
Its done on purpose to screw people over smartass :D
Parent
▼
EURUZZz 20 Aug 2008, 19:03
dunno, when i do scripts then i just put something that is in my mind on that very moment not doing some xx_ shit in fromt of it and isnt that xx part that hackers can change themselves?
Parent
▼
Quazz 20 Aug 2008, 19:29
yes so any command that has like cg_attack is considered cheat

could be like ab_attack etc
Parent
▼
Kiewan 20 Aug 2008, 15:30
are you a idiot?
Parent
▼
jonas 20 Aug 2008, 17:38
its a script from etBot
Parent
▼
k1pa 20 Aug 2008, 14:59
imo yes
▼
Lomex 20 Aug 2008, 14:59
ololo

xx_ is a prefix of an bot that cheaters are free to configure. (it can also be wx_ e$_ or whatever)

kkthxbb
▼
Quazz 20 Aug 2008, 15:01
yes you can bust him with that
▼
Deactivated5169 20 Aug 2008, 15:02
wtf are you waiting for? bust him... its cheat
▼
Deactivated5966 20 Aug 2008, 15:02
he is banned from CB for this!
▼
Yossarian 20 Aug 2008, 15:13
just a fov toggler
▼
risee 20 Aug 2008, 15:39
yes, it's part of a cheat and he will receive a cb-ban for it.
▼
GoodGuyGary 20 Aug 2008, 15:51
xx_attack = etbot

but PB should kick you for Generic CVAR Scan so prolly its an rcon kick, not sure though.
▼
Ronner 20 Aug 2008, 16:04
set xx_attack "+attack ; +sprint"
set yy_attack "-attack ; -sprint"
bind mouse1 "+vstr xx_attack yy_attack"

^^ where is the cheat?
Parent
▼
Kiewan 20 Aug 2008, 16:13
set xx_attack = "+attack ; +sprint"
set yy_attack = "-attack ; -sprint"
bind mouse1 "+vstr xx_attack yy_attack"

?
Parent
▼
m!das 20 Aug 2008, 16:24
lamenesshack!
Parent
▼
Ronner 20 Aug 2008, 16:32
apart from that. :P
Parent
▼
Bulld0g 20 Aug 2008, 16:25
It is not looking for a SET value its is looking for a specific CVAR Value of xx_ that can be modified to whatever you like in the bots .ini file. Lets not get it mistaken with a toggle variable!
Parent
▼
GoodGuyGary 20 Aug 2008, 16:25
+attack -attack not +attack ; +sprint

and xx_ = default etbot prefix
Parent
▼
Bulld0g 20 Aug 2008, 16:29
yup valid bust :)
Parent
▼
Ronner 20 Aug 2008, 16:32
Look at bulldog's answer. That would clear up more than the answer you just gave.

Difference between CVAR and a SET value.
Parent
▼
Vj 20 Aug 2008, 20:32
"+attack;-attack" used to improve the firerate of pistols on earlier versions of etpro and still does on other mods afaik. And storing CVARS with a pefix is in no way a cheater thing. It was made up by players or the ones who coded the game, to make it easier to navigate trough.
Although using "xx" might be a bit strange, it shouldn't be enough for a ban imo.

And to Ronner and Bulldog: it still is a CVAR even though you use SET or SETA to set it yourself.. CVAR-scans doesn't only look trough the default game CVARs, then it would never find the cheat-CVARS anyway.
Quote by Bulld0g".. Lets not get it mistaken with a toggle variable!"

Why not? Isn't it the exact same thing??

Atleast I find banning for this, yet not obvious demos nothing but ridiculous..
Parent
▼
michelino 21 Aug 2008, 11:15
omg shutup retardsssssssssssssssssssssssssssss


i've never seen a script with equals







LOL
Parent
▼
Ronner 21 Aug 2008, 11:18
make sense please.
Parent
▼
Yossarian 20 Aug 2008, 16:34
Skill? No, just a bot.
▼
ziqvpix 20 Aug 2008, 17:26
im clean since 1 houre, i wanna get an award
▼
Atreyu 20 Aug 2008, 17:41
so he will get banned or not ?
▼
Trixor 20 Aug 2008, 17:41
Cheater busting Cheater, n1
▼
Atreyu 20 Aug 2008, 17:42
proofs plox
Parent
▼
Trixor 20 Aug 2008, 18:01
:DDDDDDDDDD
Parent
▼
Atreyu 20 Aug 2008, 18:12
XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
oO
Parent
▼
michelino 21 Aug 2008, 11:17
omg shutup retardsssssssssssssssssssssssssssss


i've never seen a script with equals







LOL
Back to top