Violation MULTIHACK #70762

by M1st3r • 26 Oct 2009, 22:38 • Forums › Cheaters
Quote by Hendrik.T10/26/2009 15:59:51 - "Hendrik T"
We have confirmed that non-cheat software caused some of the kicks for Violation #70762. We encourage admins to give players the benefit of the doubt and ignore this violation number; it has been removed from our system.


If you didnt notice by Killerboy or whoever (i didnt), and those who are still asking if these guys are going to be banned the answer is NO.


too bad =(
Comments
41
▼
slajdan 26 Oct 2009, 22:42
so what was it?
▼
M1st3r 26 Oct 2009, 22:44
"non-cheat software caused some of the kicks " :OOOOOOO
Parent
▼
Deactivated6371 26 Oct 2009, 22:48
why too bad? Im really cool man..
▼
Homer 26 Oct 2009, 22:50
:D e2 vs inv 6.32 @ goldrush needs to be played by 1st Nov then!
Parent
▼
Deactivated6371 26 Oct 2009, 22:51
yeah sure, 6:32 can be beaten :D
Parent
▼
M1st3r 26 Oct 2009, 22:54
i love baning :XD
Parent
▼
Deactivated6371 26 Oct 2009, 22:55
lold, is it so funny to ban ppl?:D come on..
Parent
▼
M1st3r 26 Oct 2009, 23:06
When i see some ip / guid match with the database i think: oh yea one fucktard less in the ET comunity, die of aids.

Yes i like baning players like that.

PS: same reply for homer (too lazy to copy & paste) I never said i like baning without reason :D
Parent
▼
Homer 26 Oct 2009, 23:00
Let's ban you, it will be fun :)
Parent
▼
vib 26 Oct 2009, 23:14
look at his reply - he was to lazy to copy and paste it to for you ;p
Parent
▼
Nub 26 Oct 2009, 23:27
Cheater kurva, ban.
Parent
▼
walle 26 Oct 2009, 23:42
Like I said

Bug
▼
Lover 27 Oct 2009, 00:19
not a big surprise
▼
fusii 27 Oct 2009, 01:19
Like chmpp said

Bug
▼
Henk 27 Oct 2009, 02:55
ban cheater nerds
▼
w1ld 27 Oct 2009, 06:10
Cheater should get banned. And btw does anybody know if theres really a bug with pb?

I got kicked very often by pb but never with such a massage .

This is also a chance for the cheaters now they come here ah its a bug and get unbanned too ..


Its like the alcohol was the reason for my mistake .
Parent
▼
1ns4n1tY 27 Oct 2009, 09:53
fyi learn the facts first before you make such a foolish statement.
as a matter of fact it is a bug (as mentioned in the first post) so it's flatout not acceptable to ban anyone affected by it.
even if there's the chance that someone who actually did cheat gets away with it. banning people based on a bug would have devastating effects on cheatbusters' credibility.
Parent
▼
w1ld 27 Oct 2009, 16:17
Never said that anybody who got that massage is a cheater . But the cheaters may get unbanned cause of this massage too. And cheaters should get banned!!
Parent
▼
1ns4n1tY 27 Oct 2009, 17:23
well, you didn't say it explicitly, that's right. but every statement of yours points in that direction. so next time make clear what you really mean.

yes, there's the chance, that a "real" cheater might be unbanned, but: no one can tell for sure who's cheating and who isn't so the whole "just ban them"-attitude is not appropriate.

therefor: stop thinking in "good guy - bad guy" dimensions.
Parent
▼
subbi 27 Oct 2009, 14:51
lulz, wierd stuff, most people never get this kick, prolly hax anyway
▼
romah 27 Oct 2009, 15:03
i dont agree, could b any software as written up.
Parent
▼
MisterFister 27 Oct 2009, 15:44
b
ba
ban
bana
banan
banana
banan
bana
ban
ba
b
▼
Jonasty 27 Oct 2009, 16:27
p
ph
pho
phon
phone
phon
pho
ph
p
Parent
▼
nezziix 27 Oct 2009, 16:24
b
ba
ban
bana
banan
banana
banan
bana
ban
ba
b
▼
Neverrrrrrr 27 Oct 2009, 17:59
ban all mutlhax :] !
Back to top