The 2009 Report contains matches played from 1st January 2009 to 31st December 2009.
January 2009: 406
February 2009: 457
March 2009: 706
April 2009: 452
May 2009: 390
June 2009: 302
July 2009: 258
August 2009: 228
September 2009: 232
October 2009: 277
November 2009: 358
December 2009: 420
Total Matches played in 2009: 4486
Number of Matches played in 2009
January 2009: 406
February 2009: 457
March 2009: 706
April 2009: 452
May 2009: 390
June 2009: 302
July 2009: 258
August 2009: 228
September 2009: 232
October 2009: 277
November 2009: 358
December 2009: 420
Total Matches played in 2009: 4486
So according to the last graph, activity should pick up like it did in the past!
Total Matches played in 2009: 5538
??
there is no honour in being #1 at cb ladder, noone cares. why didnt you figure out a way to change this rather than making some graphs D:
oh and on a sidenote, people dont just randomly play praccs. u find a pracc often because u want to try a new defence, a new player, something radical maybe. why would u want these test results logged on some ladder?
for real clans you really need a ladder system.
others are 2 afraid to play ladder games cause they might loose
dont think anything will change the attitude of the players is just too fucked up
YOU MEAN S6?:PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
:DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD!
Don't think you needed to put so much effort in this to prove the obvious. What will you do with this report? :) Anyway at least well done for putting so much effort in it :)
If you don't care about placing good on the ladders, then why not do this? If more activity on the ladders make CB put more effort and maybe even cash into ET, then why not? It's an incredibly small effort for a potentially large reward.
you are pretty much screwed
We have other "ocassional" cups and tournaments, but ladders are always active and it's the perfect place to keep competition alive. I miss many teams on ladder nowadays, teams that are active and playing.
Like you say it doesnt take that much to play at least a match per week and all ET benefits from this having more variety of teams and players to challenge.
However in 2 years, that last paragraph is the only "promotion" I have seen for ladders.
Anyway I hope that forcing 5on5 and automatches gave you a lesson of what NOT to do and that more teams join CB ladder specially which for good or bad remains the most active ladder.
scrims lack the whee bit of tension that ladder games have, yet it has become way too repetitive playing against the same opponents in the 2on2/3on3 ladder already. it beats me as to why people that are registered on CB would play a prac instead of an official. it takes just about 2 minutes tops to create the challenge and another 30 seconds to accept one. scrims seem to end the very same way each and every time - whether your opponent jumps up screaming "HAHAHAHAH N1 WH" resulting in a kick in just about 2 minutes or you are playing against totally unknown poles spreading 80 headies per round. you pick.
the answer? an opencup for both formats !
In a perfect world any team that likes this game should join ladders as the key place to keep competition alive.
always when I ask 1on1 offi silly ctf, never play
Bring 6on6 back and promotion for the ladder, not in a lost article like this.
like cb 6v6 open cup from X to X.
this would give a better representation of how tournaments/cups/etc affected games.
additionally at least have Crossfire Lan @ X as i would feel that this would have the greatest impact to games played. or something along those lines.
without looking at other contingent factors those graphs are fairly useless.
be afraid